On 7/23/20 11:45 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: > From: Laurent Vivier <[email protected]> > > Our safe_clock_nanosleep() returns -1 and updates errno. > > We don't need to update the CRF bit in syscall.c because it will > be updated in ppc/cpu_loop.c as the return value is negative. > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <[email protected]> > Message-Id: <[email protected]> > --- > linux-user/syscall.c | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]> r~
