On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 4:33 PM Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
> 21.01.2025 20:06, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In this new version, in patch 2, we're using the address 'size' val from
> > riscv_cpu_tlb_fill() instead of infering it from the CPU XLEN.
> >
> > No other changes made. Pat
21.01.2025 20:06, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Hi,
In this new version, in patch 2, we're using the address 'size' val from
riscv_cpu_tlb_fill() instead of infering it from the CPU XLEN.
No other changes made. Patches based on master.
Changes from v2:
- patch 2:
- use 'size' instead of i
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 3:07 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In this new version, in patch 2, we're using the address 'size' val from
> riscv_cpu_tlb_fill() instead of infering it from the CPU XLEN.
>
> No other changes made. Patches based on master.
>
> Changes from v2:
> - patch 2
Hi,
In this new version, in patch 2, we're using the address 'size' val from
riscv_cpu_tlb_fill() instead of infering it from the CPU XLEN.
No other changes made. Patches based on master.
Changes from v2:
- patch 2:
- use 'size' instead of infering wp_len using the CPU XLEN
- v2 link:
https: