Peter Maydell writes:
> We used to make a distinction between 'float64'/'float32' types and
> the 'uint64_t'/'uint32_t' types, requiring special conversion
> operations to go between them. We've now dropped this distinction as
> unnecessary, and the 'float*' types remain primarily for
> docume
On 2/8/21 12:34 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> We used to make a distinction between 'float64'/'float32' types and
> the 'uint64_t'/'uint32_t' types, requiring special conversion
> operations to go between them. We've now dropped this distinction as
> unnecessary, and the 'float*' types remain primari
We used to make a distinction between 'float64'/'float32' types and
the 'uint64_t'/'uint32_t' types, requiring special conversion
operations to go between them. We've now dropped this distinction as
unnecessary, and the 'float*' types remain primarily for
documentation purposes when used in places
