Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 453: Explicit bootstrapping of pip

2013-09-17 Thread R. David Murray
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 12:38:31 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote: > On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:25 PM, "R. David Murray" wrote: > > I don't think this PEP changes the inclusion calculus, because I don't > > think we've given any real weight to that in stdlib inclusion decisions. > > I think the decision making

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 453: Explicit bootstrapping of pip

2013-09-17 Thread Donald Stufft
On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:25 PM, "R. David Murray" wrote: > This PEP looks great to me. Thanks to everyone involved. > > On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:46:01 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> Reducing the burden of actually installing a third-party package should >> also decrease the pressure to add every u

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 453: Explicit bootstrapping of pip

2013-09-17 Thread R. David Murray
This PEP looks great to me. Thanks to everyone involved. On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:46:01 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > Reducing the burden of actually installing a third-party package should > also decrease the pressure to add every useful module to the standard > library. This will allow additions