This PEP looks great to me. Thanks to everyone involved. On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:46:01 +1000, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Reducing the burden of actually installing a third-party package should > also decrease the pressure to add every useful module to the standard > library. This will allow additions to the standard library to focus more > on why Python should have a particular tool out of the box instead of > using the general difficulty of installing third-party packages as > justification for inclusion.
I don't think this PEP changes the inclusion calculus, because I don't think we've given any real weight to that in stdlib inclusion decisions. I think the decision making is already focused on why Python should have a particular tool out of the box. The only context I recall where "installation difficulty" has been considered relevant is the issue of corporate users restricted from installing 3rd party packages...which will not be affected at all by this PEP. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com