[Python-Dev] GSOC

i want to contribute in mailman which is a sub-org under python software in GSOC there's 2 templates to submit i want to know which template is the correct one, the one in mailman's site or the one in python's site ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-

[Python-Dev] GSoC: looking for a student to help on FAT Python

Hi, I am now looking for a Google Summer of Code (GSoC) student to help me of my FAT Python project, a new static optimizer for CPython 3.6 using specialization with guards. The FAT Python project is already fully functional, the code is written and tested. I need help to implement new efficient

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2014 - Status for Core Python

On 27 Feb 2014 08:07, "Tim Delaney" wrote: > > On 27 February 2014 05:53, Terry Reedy wrote: >> >> >> PSF acts as an umbrella organization for multiple Python projects >> https://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2014 >> Core Python is the first listed of about 15. > > > I'm guessing Mercurial wi

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2014 - Status for Core Python

On 27 February 2014 05:53, Terry Reedy wrote: > > PSF acts as an umbrella organization for multiple Python projects > https://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2014 > Core Python is the first listed of about 15. > I'm guessing Mercurial will appear under the umbrella in the not to distant future

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2014 - Status for Core Python

On 26 February 2014 18:53, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 2/26/2014 12:34 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > >> The subject of this email mentions GSoC, it's probably worth >> clarifying that the GSoC process is still under way and there isn't >> (as far as I know, I'm not involved myself) a confirmed list of >> me

[Python-Dev] GSoC 2014 - Status for Core Python

On 2/26/2014 12:34 PM, Paul Moore wrote: The subject of this email mentions GSoC, it's probably worth clarifying that the GSoC process is still under way and there isn't (as far as I know, I'm not involved myself) a confirmed list of mentors and projects in place yet. There is a confirmed list

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2014 - Email Module

On 26 February 2014 16:13, Brett Cannon wrote: >>> >>> Please sign up for core-mentorship list and ask questions there. >> >> >> Is this for students too? Because I want to join as a student. > > > The mailing list is for anyone who wants to contribute to Python's > development and wants some help

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2014 - Email Module

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Surya wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: > >> On 2/25/2014 8:56 PM, Surya wrote: >> >>> Hey there, >>> >>> I am Surya, studying final year of Engineering. I have looked into Core >>> Python's ideas list and got interested in Email

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2014 - Email Module

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 2/25/2014 8:56 PM, Surya wrote: > >> Hey there, >> >> I am Surya, studying final year of Engineering. I have looked into Core >> Python's ideas list and got interested in Email module. >> >> I've been working on Django over the past few ye

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2014 - Email Module

On 2/25/2014 8:56 PM, Surya wrote: Hey there, I am Surya, studying final year of Engineering. I have looked into Core Python's ideas list and got interested in Email module. I've been working on Django over the past few years, and now like to work on slightly a different layer of protocols and

[Python-Dev] GSoC 2014 - Email Module

Hey there, I am Surya, studying final year of Engineering. I have looked into Core Python's ideas list and got interested in Email module. I've been working on Django over the past few years, and now like to work on slightly a different layer of protocols and this idea happened to be it. That s

[Python-Dev] GSOC 2014 - IDLE Project

Hi, Saimadhav Heblikar here.I would like to express my interest in working on IDLE improvement project as a part of Google Summer of Code 2014 for Python Core projects under the Python Software Foundation.I am currently a freshman Computer Science undergraduate student at PESIT , Bangalore. Simi

Re: [Python-Dev] GSOC 2014

Thank you for your recommendations Jessica. I am looking forward to work with python this gsoc. On 22 February 2014 08:39, Jessica McKellar wrote: > Hi Navneet, > > >This is my first year in gsoc. I have been working with python and > django > > from quite a time. One of the Gsoc proposed id

Re: [Python-Dev] GSOC 2014

Hi Navneet, >This is my first year in gsoc. I have been working with python and django > from quite a time. One of the Gsoc proposed ideas drew my attention and i > would surely like to work on that. > I would like to work for creating a extension for idle to integrate > PEP8, what are the

[Python-Dev] GSOC 2014

Hi, This is my first year in gsoc. I have been working with python and django from quite a time. One of the Gsoc proposed ideas drew my attention and i would surely like to work on that. I would like to work for creating a extension for idle to integrate PEP8, what are the prerequisites . I

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2012: Python Core Participation?

Good evening, > If you are a core committer and volunteer as GSoC > mentor for 2012, please let me know by Friday > (March 23rd). There is a number of interesting things to implement in packaging, and at least one student who manifested their interest, but unfortunately I am presently unable to sa

[Python-Dev] GSoC 2012: Python Core Participation?

I'm wondering whether Python Core should participate in GSoC 2012 or not, as core contributors have shown little interest in acting as mentors in the past. If you are a core committer and volunteer as GSoC mentor for 2012, please let me know by Friday (March 23rd). Regards, Martin __

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:39: >> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel >>  wrote: >>> >>> Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > Thank

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:39: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: Hi Daniel, Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking efforts. My brief comment i

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28: >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: >>> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> Thanks for putting this together.  I am a huge supporter of benchmarking >>> efforts.  My brief comment is below. >>> >>> On W

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

I talked to Fijal about my project last night, the result is that basically the project as is, is not that interesting because the means to execute the benchmarks on multiple interpreters are currently missing. Another point we talked about was that porting the benchmarks would not be very useful

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On 4/8/2011 11:32 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: an interpreter. For the purposes of benchmarking, the distinction between compiler and interpreter, as some one said above, 'dubious'. I agree. We should be comparing 'Python execution systems'. My impression is that some of what Cython does in te

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

> > > > > > > >> and will you complain if we don't provide a custom cython > >> hacks? (like providing extra type information) > > > > I don't consider providing extra type information a hack. Remember that > they > > are only used for additional speed-ups in cases where the author is > smarter > >

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Tres Seaver wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/07/2011 07:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > >> Personally I think the Gsoc project should just take the pypy suite and >> run with that - bikeshedding about what benchmarks to include is goi

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/07/2011 07:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > Personally I think the Gsoc project should just take the pypy suite and > run with that - bikeshedding about what benchmarks to include is going > to make it hard to make progress. We can have fun with

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 13:37: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: So, once CPython is up and running in the benchmark test, adding Cython should be as easy as copying the configuration, installing Cython and adding two lines to site.py. can you provide a simple comman

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41: >> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel >>  wrote: >>> >>> Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > Thanks

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On 08/04/2011 11:18, Stefan Behnel wrote: Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: [snip...] So, once CPython is up and running in the benchmark test, adding Cython should be as easy as copying the configuration, installing Cython and adding

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

Maciej Fijalkowski, 08.04.2011 11:41: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: Hi Daniel, Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking efforts. My brief comment i

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28: >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: >>> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> Thanks for putting this together.  I am a huge supporter of benchmarking >>> efforts.  My brief comment is below. >>> >>> On W

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

Jesse Noller, 07.04.2011 22:28: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: Hi Daniel, Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking efforts. My brief comment is below. On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch wrote: 1. Definition of the benchmark suite.

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Jesse Noller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord > wrote: >> On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord >> wrote: >>> >>> On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote: On Thu, 07 Apr 2

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Jesse Noller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord > wrote: > > On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord > > > wrote: > >> > >> On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord > wrote: >> >> On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400 >>> Tres Seaver  wrote: > > Right now,

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > > *some* good benchmarks in place (and the pypy ones are good ones). > Agreed. The PyPy ones are good. > > So I'm still with Jesse on this one. If there is any "discussion phase" as > part of the Gsoc project it should be very strictly boun

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On 08/04/2011 00:36, Anthony Scopatz wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord mailto:fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk>> wrote: On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote: On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400 Tres Seavermailto:tsea...@palladion.com>> wrote:

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400 >> Tres Seaver wrote: >> >>> Right now, we are talking about building "speed.python.org" to test the speed of python interpreters, over time, and alongsid

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On 07/04/2011 22:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote: On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400 Tres Seaver wrote: Right now, we are talking about building "speed.python.org" to test the speed of python interpreters, over time, and alongside one another - cython *is not* an interpreter. Cython is out of scope f

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:32:24 -0400 Tres Seaver wrote: > > > > Right now, we are talking about building "speed.python.org" to test > > the speed of python interpreters, over time, and alongside one another > > - cython *is not* an interpreter. > > > > Cython is out of scope for this. > > Why is

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/07/2011 04:28 PM, Jesse Noller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking >> efforts. My brief comment is below. >> >> On Wed, Apr 6,

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On 06/04/2011 17:52, DasIch wrote: Hello Guys, I would like to present my proposal for the Google Summer of Code, concerning the idea of porting the benchmarks to Python 3.x for speed.pypy.org. I think I have successfully integrated the feedback I got from prior discussions on the topic and I wou

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > Hi Daniel, > Thanks for putting this together.  I am a huge supporter of benchmarking > efforts.  My brief comment is below. > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch wrote: >> >> 1. Definition of the benchmark suite. This will entail con

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

Hi Daniel, Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking efforts. My brief comment is below. On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch wrote: > > 1. Definition of the benchmark suite. This will entail contacting > developers of Python implementations (CPython, PyPy, Ir

[Python-Dev] [GSoC] Developing a benchmark suite (for Python 3.x)

Hello Guys, I would like to present my proposal for the Google Summer of Code, concerning the idea of porting the benchmarks to Python 3.x for speed.pypy.org. I think I have successfully integrated the feedback I got from prior discussions on the topic and I would like to hear your opinion. Abstra

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC idea: PEP process enhancements (Was: [issue7284] argparse - display version in usage by default)

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:55 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > What if we could accompany every PEP draft with series of use > cases/user stories? I don't know how many people actually reviewed > this particular PEP 389, and that's bad, because without this info it > is hard to say if there were enou

[Python-Dev] GSoC idea: PEP process enhancements (Was: [issue7284] argparse - display version in usage by default)

On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:14 PM, anatoly techtonik > wrote: >> A pity that before argparse replaced optparse, there was no research >> made to gather the output from various console tools to see how >> argparse really saves people from reinv

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Porting on RPM3

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > The bindings cannot go changing header contents to their liking, so any > canonicalization would have to go into rpm proper, the build-side of things > to be exact so the runtime doesn't have to care. Requiring rpm to fiddle > with encoding

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Porting on RPM3

On 03/22/2011 03:06 AM, David Malcolm wrote: [CCing Panu Matilainen, the maintainer of rpm, or, at least rpm 4.*, which is what all major distributions are using AIUI] On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 10:50 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: Am 21.03.2011 07:37, schrieb Prashant Kumar: Hello, My name i

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Porting on RPM3

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:06:22PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > Other ideas that occur: > - does rpmlint check for encoding yet? > - what to do e.g. about canonicalization? What happens if one rpm > provide a feature named "café" (where the "é" is U+00E9) and another rpm > requires a featu

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Porting on RPM3

[CCing Panu Matilainen, the maintainer of rpm, or, at least rpm 4.*, which is what all major distributions are using AIUI] On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 10:50 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Am 21.03.2011 07:37, schrieb Prashant Kumar: > > Hello, > > My name is Prashant Kumar and I've worked on por

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:06:09 -0600 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > > Indeed, sorry, I didn't follow too closely. It's worth considering > what would be the obvious next goal. This repo changed (and I believe > you're the main person according to the change log) to provide python > 3 support. On the o

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le lundi 21 mars 2011 à 16:21 -0600, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit : >> The original idea was to converge and have the >> common repo on hg.python.org, but since unladen run out of steam, >> nobody bothered to update the hg.python.org one so we

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

>> 3. Several benchmarks (at least the Django and Twisted ones) have >> dependencies which are not (yet) ported to 3.x and porting those >> dependencies during GSoC as part of this project is an unrealistic >> goal. Should those benchmarks, at least for now, be ignored? >> > > IMHO: Yes. I think M

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

Le lundi 21 mars 2011 à 16:21 -0600, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit : > The original idea was to converge and have the > common repo on hg.python.org, but since unladen run out of steam, > nobody bothered to update the hg.python.org one so we continued on our > own. I'm not sure who is "nobody" in tha

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:24 PM, DasIch wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:33:55 +0100 >> DasIch wrote: >>> >>> 3. Several benchmarks (at least the Django and Twisted ones) have >>> dependencies which are not (yet) ported to 3.x and porting

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:33:55 +0100 > DasIch wrote: >> >> 3. Several benchmarks (at least the Django and Twisted ones) have >> dependencies which are not (yet) ported to 3.x and porting those >> dependencies during GSoC as part of this proje

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:30:45 -0500 s...@pobox.com wrote: > > >> Is there any value in them as regression tests (maybe with more > >> elaborate inputs and/or longer runtimes)? > > Antoine> You mean to check behaviour or to check for performance > Antoine> regressions? > > Both. S

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

>> Is there any value in them as regression tests (maybe with more >> elaborate inputs and/or longer runtimes)? Antoine> You mean to check behaviour or to check for performance Antoine> regressions? Both. Semantic regressions, and secondarily, performance regressions. I can unde

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

Le lundi 21 mars 2011 à 14:06 -0500, s...@pobox.com a écrit : > Antoine> Why not reuse the benchmarks in > Antoine> http://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ ? > > These looks like basically the same benchmarks as the Unladen Swallow folks > put together, right? Yes, it's basically the continuation of

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

Antoine> Why not reuse the benchmarks in Antoine> http://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ ? These looks like basically the same benchmarks as the Unladen Swallow folks put together, right? Is there any value in them as regression tests (maybe with more elaborate inputs and/or longer runtimes)?

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

Le lundi 21 mars 2011 à 14:51 -0400, Jesse Noller a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:33:55 +0100 > > DasIch wrote: > >> > >> 3. Several benchmarks (at least the Django and Twisted ones) have > >> dependencies which are not (yet) ported to

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:33:55 +0100 > DasIch wrote: >> >> 3. Several benchmarks (at least the Django and Twisted ones) have >> dependencies which are not (yet) ported to 3.x and porting those >> dependencies during GSoC as part of this proje

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

Some remarks below. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:33 PM, DasIch wrote: > Hello Guys, > I'm interested in participating in the Google Summer of Code this year > and I've been looking at projects in the Wiki, particularly > speed.pypy.org[1] as I'm very interested in the current VM > development. Howev

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:33:55 +0100 DasIch wrote: > > 3. Several benchmarks (at least the Django and Twisted ones) have > dependencies which are not (yet) ported to 3.x and porting those > dependencies during GSoC as part of this project is an unrealistic > goal. Should those benchmarks, at least

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:33 PM, DasIch wrote: > Hello Guys, > I'm interested in participating in the Google Summer of Code this year > and I've been looking at projects in the Wiki, particularly > speed.pypy.org[1] as I'm very interested in the current VM > development. However given my knowledg

[Python-Dev] GSoC: speed.python.org

Hello Guys, I'm interested in participating in the Google Summer of Code this year and I've been looking at projects in the Wiki, particularly speed.pypy.org[1] as I'm very interested in the current VM development. However given my knowledge that project raised several questions: 1. Up until now t

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Porting on RPM3

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:50 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Am 21.03.2011 07:37, schrieb Prashant Kumar: >> Hello, >>     My name is  Prashant Kumar and I've worked on porting few python >> libraries(distutils2, configobj) and I've been looking at the ideas >> list for GSoC for a project related t

Re: [Python-Dev] [GSoC] Porting on RPM3

Am 21.03.2011 07:37, schrieb Prashant Kumar: > Hello, > My name is Prashant Kumar and I've worked on porting few python > libraries(distutils2, configobj) and I've been looking at the ideas > list for GSoC for a project related to porting. > > I came across [1] and found it interesting.

[Python-Dev] [GSoC] Porting on RPM3

Hello, My name is Prashant Kumar and I've worked on porting few python libraries(distutils2, configobj) and I've been looking at the ideas list for GSoC for a project related to porting. I came across [1] and found it interesting. It mentions that some of the work has already been done;

[Python-Dev] GSoC mentors: projects list is up

If you want to see a project done in this year's GSoC, please add it to http://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2011 Python 3 related projects are preferred. Students will look at this page for ideas what kinds of projects to propose; the earlier you add an idea, the more likely is it that yo

Re: [Python-Dev] Gsoc 2011 ideas

I've compiled a list of issues with python.org services that are not strictly related to core development, but still may be beneficial for Python community as a GSoC project at http://code.google.com/p/pydotorg/issues/list Feel free to add your own proposals/ideas. -- anatoly t. On Sat, Feb 12,

Re: [Python-Dev] Gsoc 2011 ideas

Hey Yeswanth Students who get involved with the projects they plan to work with early have a definite edge over students who don't, so certainly get involved now. While I would highly encourage you to get involved with python-dev (core projects are top in line), you may also want to consider 3rd

[Python-Dev] Gsoc 2011 ideas

Hi everyone, I am planning to apply for Gsoc 2011 for the PSF . I would like to know if any of you have any ideas which can be implemented this summer. I guess the gsoc 2011 ideas page has not been put up as yet. So I thought maybe any of you can suggest some ideas . Thanks Yeswanth __

[Python-Dev] GSoC mentors needed

It seems the Python (core) project needs some more mentors, to really match the proposals that we got. I don't want to post a list of proposals here, so if you are willing to potentially mentor a project, please join the soc2010-mentors list ASAP and/or contact Arc Riley. Doing so would neither be

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 05:41:47PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > anatoly techtonik writes: > > > I would vote for allowing student work on community infrastructure > > tasks. Tracker, Wiki, Web site management tools are all outdated and > > everybody who cares agrees that they've seen a b

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

anatoly techtonik writes: > I would vote for allowing student work on community infrastructure > tasks. Tracker, Wiki, Web site management tools are all outdated and > everybody who cares agrees that they've seen a better tools. I've also seen *much* worse tools in actual use. You don't have

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM, C. Titus Brown wrote: > >> I would vote for allowing student work on community infrastructure >> tasks. Tracker, Wiki, Web site management tools are all outdated and >> everybody who cares agrees that they've seen a better tools. > > As long as it's programming, it

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:40:06AM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: > I would vote for allowing student work on community infrastructure > tasks. Tracker, Wiki, Web site management tools are all outdated and > everybody who cares agrees that they've seen a better tools. As long as it's programming,

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

I would vote for allowing student work on community infrastructure tasks. Tracker, Wiki, Web site management tools are all outdated and everybody who cares agrees that they've seen a better tools. -- anatoly t. On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:36 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote: > Hi all, > > once again, t

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

I'm sure we can find you a mentor. On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Joe Amenta wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: > >> On 3/19/2010 2:23 AM, Laurent Gautier wrote: >> >>> On 3/19/10 3:36 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote: >>> Hi all, once again, the PSF has been

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 3/19/2010 2:23 AM, Laurent Gautier wrote: > >> On 3/19/10 3:36 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> once again, the PSF has been accepted as a mentoring foundation for >>> the Google >>> Summer of Code! This year, we're going to

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

On 3/20/10 4:13 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote: On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:00:48AM +0100, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: Whether this is worth weeks of work or not will depend on a given student's knowledge about Python 3, and I'd suspect that the GSoC would be an opportunity for a number of applicant to ac

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:00:48AM +0100, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: > > Whether this is worth weeks of work or not will depend on a given > > student's knowledge about Python 3, and I'd suspect that the GSoC would > > be an opportunity for a number of applicant to actually learn the > > intricacies

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

> Whether this is worth weeks of work or not will depend on a given > student's knowledge about Python 3, and I'd suspect that the GSoC would > be an opportunity for a number of applicant to actually learn the > intricacies of Python 3. > Developing Python 3-specific features could be used to incre

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

On 3/19/10 12:57 PM, Arc Riley wrote: Hi Laurent If your community project would like help porting to Python 3, and you feel this work is enough for a student to work full time for several weeks on, then please do add it to the GSoC ideas page on the wiki. Whether this is worth weeks of work o

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

Hi Laurent If your community project would like help porting to Python 3, and you feel this work is enough for a student to work full time for several weeks on, then please do add it to the GSoC ideas page on the wiki. There will be another program running for high school students which is more s

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

On 3/19/2010 2:23 AM, Laurent Gautier wrote: On 3/19/10 3:36 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote: Hi all, once again, the PSF has been accepted as a mentoring foundation for the Google Summer of Code! This year, we're going to emphasize python 3 porting, so please think of projects you'd like to see tackl

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

On 3/19/10 3:36 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote: Hi all, once again, the PSF has been accepted as a mentoring foundation for the Google Summer of Code! This year, we're going to emphasize python 3 porting, so please think of projects you'd like to see tackled. Hi, Does this mean that any other pyt

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:13:42PM -0500, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2010/3/18 C. Titus Brown : > > Hi all, > > > > once again, the PSF has been accepted as a mentoring foundation for the > > Google > > Summer of Code! ??This year, we're going to emphasize python 3 porting, so > > please think of

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

2010/3/18 C. Titus Brown : > Hi all, > > once again, the PSF has been accepted as a mentoring foundation for the Google > Summer of Code!  This year, we're going to emphasize python 3 porting, so > please think of projects you'd like to see tackled. This is not completely to the exclusion of other

[Python-Dev] GSoC 2010 is on -- projects?

Hi all, once again, the PSF has been accepted as a mentoring foundation for the Google Summer of Code! This year, we're going to emphasize python 3 porting, so please think of projects you'd like to see tackled. Please submit ideas for projects as soon as possible, as students will be able to st

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: Replace MS Windows Console with Unicode UI

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009, INADA Naoki wrote: > > I found WriteConsoleW() API recently. > This API can write utf16 string to console directly, without change > OutputCodepage. > > example: > http://bitbucket.org/methane/hg-fixutf8-jp/src/tip/win32helper.py#cl-42 > > I think this API is good for py3k.

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: Replace MS Windows Console with Unicode UI

> When stdout is console and not redirected to [pipe|file], > sys.stdout.write(u"foo") > can avoid encoding and use WriteConsoleW(L"foo") I think this would be fairly difficult to implement given the way the output libraries work. If you think it can be done, please provide a patch to bugs.python.

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: Replace MS Windows Console with Unicode UI

Hi. >> We have to use "IME" to input non-ascii charactor in Windows. >> When "> chcp 65001" in cmd.exe, we cannot use IME on cmd.exe. >> >> So setting codepage to 65001 make output universal but make input ascii-only. >> Sit!!! > > Is there a code page that still allows IME input, but supports all

[Python-Dev] GSoC (was Re: PyDict_SetItem hook)

On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 06:28:01AM -0700, Aahz wrote: -> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009, Collin Winter wrote: -> > -> > I don't believe that these are insurmountable problems, though. A -> > great contribution to Python performance work would be an improved -> > version of PyBench that corrects these problem

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC 2009: Roundup / Python Tracker enhancements

Aahz wrote: > Is this for GSoC?  If yes, please make sure to include that tag in the > Subject: line to make it easier to track. Oops, makes a lot of sense :) Daniel ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: Replace MS Windows Console with Unicode UI

On approximately 3/24/2009 10:16 AM, came the following characters from the keyboard of INADA Naoki: Hi. I'm Japanese and non-ascii charactor user. (cp932) We have to use "IME" to input non-ascii charactor in Windows. When "> chcp 65001" in cmd.exe, we cannot use IME on cmd.exe. So setting code

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: Replace MS Windows Console with Unicode UI

> Hi. I'm Japanese and non-ascii charactor user. (cp932) > > We have to use "IME" to input non-ascii charactor in Windows. > When "> chcp 65001" in cmd.exe, we cannot use IME on cmd.exe. > > So setting codepage to 65001 make output universal but make input ascii-only. > Sit!!! Is there a code pa

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: Replace MS Windows Console with Unicode UI

Hi. I'm Japanese and non-ascii charactor user. (cp932) We have to use "IME" to input non-ascii charactor in Windows. When "> chcp 65001" in cmd.exe, we cannot use IME on cmd.exe. So setting codepage to 65001 make output universal but make input ascii-only. Sit!!! I hope PyQtShell

Re: [Python-Dev] GSoC: Core Python development tools

Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Well, it seems to me that most of these steps are separated by manual > intervention (e.g. compile and run the test suite to check that everything > works > smoothly) Agreed. > so there's no real point in making a script out of them. The idea would be to provide scripts

  1   2   >