Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] stdlib reorganization

2006-05-31 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:46:06PM -0700, Talin wrote: > I like it. Its a much cleaner organization than the 2.4 libs. I would > like to see it used as a starting point for a reorg of the standard lib > namespace. I'm not convinced that the chapter organization of a book is necessarily the best

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] stdlib reorganization

2006-05-30 Thread Talin
A.M. Kuchling wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:36:02PM -0600, Steven Bethard wrote: > >>That sounds about reasonable. One possible grouping: > > > Note that 2.5's library reference has a different chapter organization > from 2.4's. See . I like it.

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] stdlib reorganization

2006-05-30 Thread Brett Cannon
On 5/30/06, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:36:02PM -0600, Steven Bethard wrote:> That sounds about reasonable.  One possible grouping:Note that 2.5's library reference has a different chapter organizationfrom 2.4's.  See < http://docs.python.org/dev/lib/lib.html

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] stdlib reorganization

2006-05-30 Thread A.M. Kuchling
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:36:02PM -0600, Steven Bethard wrote: > That sounds about reasonable. One possible grouping: Note that 2.5's library reference has a different chapter organization from 2.4's. See . --amk

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] stdlib reorganization

2006-05-30 Thread Brett Cannon
On 5/30/06, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Steven Bethard]> I think that having a package level that exactly matches the divisions> in the Library Reference (http://docs.python.org/lib/lib.html) would > be great.[Brett Cannon]> Makes sense to me.>[snip]> > 5. Miscellaneous Services>> I

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] stdlib reorganization

2006-05-30 Thread Steven Bethard
[Steven Bethard] > I think that having a package level that exactly matches the divisions > in the Library Reference (http://docs.python.org/lib/lib.html) would > be great. [Brett Cannon] > Makes sense to me. > [snip] > > 5. Miscellaneous Services > > I don't think we necessarily want a misc packa

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] stdlib reorganization

2006-05-30 Thread Brett Cannon
On 5/30/06, Steven Bethard < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/30/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> So, first step in my mind is settling if we want to add one more depth to > the stdlib, and if so, how we want to group (not specific groupings, just > general guidelines).I think that having