A.M. Kuchling wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 03:36:02PM -0600, Steven Bethard wrote: > >>That sounds about reasonable. One possible grouping: > > > Note that 2.5's library reference has a different chapter organization > from 2.4's. See <http://docs.python.org/dev/lib/lib.html>.
I like it. Its a much cleaner organization than the 2.4 libs. I would like to see it used as a starting point for a reorg of the standard lib namespace. One question that is raised is whether the categories should map directly to package names in all cases. For example, I can envision a desire that 'sys' would stay a top-level name, rather than 'rt.sys'. Certain modules are so fundamental that they deserve IMHO to live in the root namespace. -- Talin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
