etwork = third_network.next_network(new_prefixlen=25)
> # fourth_network = IPv4Network("10.200.20.128/25)
>
> When you are dealing with the same prefix size for each new network, I think
> it's just a simple case of adding 1 to the broadcast address each time, but
>
> On 20 Mar 2021, at 04:39, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> Honestly this is an example of a module that would have been better off
> outside the stdlib.
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 14:43 Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:36 AM Faisal Mahmood
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I h
> On 9 Feb 2021, at 11:22, Erlend Aasland wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> What's the recommended approach with issues like
> https://bugs.python.org/issue43094? Change the docs or the implementation? I
> did a quick search on bpo, but could not find similar past issues.
>
>
>
> Erlend
To provide
> On 9 Dec 2020, at 19:59, Steve Holden wrote:
>
> A general wish not to disadvantage those with older hardware any more than
> they already are?
>
> Just a shot in the dark.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 6:17 PM Gregory P. Smith wrote:
>
>
> As a meta question: Is there a good reason to
> On 9 Jul 2020, at 17:49, Federico Salerno wrote:
>
> On 09/07/2020 01:27, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> On 07/08/2020 10:44 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>>
>>> So namespaced variables only... is there a recommendation on handling
>>> global() and local() type variables?
>>
>> Okay, some off-list di
> On 24 Jun 2020, at 19:14, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> (Jakub, next time please trim the original post from your quote to what's
> necessary.)
>
Apologies, unintentional, I was replying from the web interface since I wasn’t
subscribed to this gorup when the thread was started and I clicked
> On 24 Jun 2020, at 17:57, mi...@drach.uk wrote:
>
> To me match also sound confusing as a keyword. You don't match things to
> cases in English.
> Maybe match x: against 1? https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/match+against
>
> match point:
>against (x, 1):
>...
>against (1,
