On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Lambda was almost removed in Python 3.
>
>>
>> Using `dict` to store lambdas:
>>
>> > op = { 'add': lambda x,y: x*y, 'mul': lambda x, y: x+y}
>>
>> Shows the hack to bypass PEP8 guides. Do you like to see code above
>> instead of:
>>
>> add =
Hi Terry,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> def f(x): return 2*x
> f = lambda x: 2*x
> Three spaces is seldom a crucial difference. If the expression is so long it
> go past the limit (whatever we decide it is), it can be wrapped.
and if I have multiple lambda-like def`s it
Hi Steven,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On 02/08/13 00:48, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ronald,
>>
>> I understand this, but I'm a bit confused about fate of lambdas with
>> such guideline
...and, if so, why lambda's?(: Without backward compatibility point I
see that they are getting "unofficially" deprecated and their usage is
dishonoured.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 1 Aug, 2013, at 16:48, Alexander Shorin
they are looks useless (or useful only for very trivial cases)
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 1 Aug, 2013, at 16:34, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
Hi Nick,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> 9. Explicit guideline not to assign lambdas to names (use def, that's
> what it's for)
Even for propose to fit chars-per-line limit and/or to remove
duplicates (especially for sorted groupby case)?
--
,,,^..^,,,
