Hi Ronald, I understand this, but I'm a bit confused about fate of lambdas with such guideline since I see no more reasons to use them with p.9 statement: long lines, code duplicate, no mock and well tests etc. - all these problems could be solved with assigning lambda to some name, but now they are looks useless (or useful only for very trivial cases) -- ,,,^..^,,,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Ronald Oussoren <ronaldousso...@mac.com> wrote: > > On 1 Aug, 2013, at 16:34, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Nick, >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 9. Explicit guideline not to assign lambdas to names (use def, that's >>> what it's for) >> >> Even for propose to fit chars-per-line limit and/or to remove >> duplicates (especially for sorted groupby case)? > > When you do "name = lambda ..." you've created a named function, when you > do that your better of using def statement for the reasons Nick mentioned > in the PEP. > > Ronald > >> >> -- >> ,,,^..^,,, >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ronaldoussoren%40mac.com > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com