Re: [Python-Dev] PyCon US 2014

2013-10-22 Thread Brett Cannon
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Michael Foord wrote: > > On 10 Oct 2013, at 01:53, Eric Snow wrote: > > > Registration is now open for PyCon US 2014. Are there any plans yet > > for the language summit? Just the day (e.g. Thursday April 10) will > > suffice. Then we can make arrangements app

Re: [Python-Dev] compile python 3.3 with bz2 support

2013-10-22 Thread o1dnik
Oleg Broytman phdru.name> writes: > > Hello. > >We are sorry but we cannot help you. This mailing list is to work on > developing Python (adding new features to Python itself and fixing bugs); > if you're having problems learning, understanding or using Python, please > find another forum.

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (ensurepip) updated

2013-10-22 Thread Ned Deily
In article , Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 22 October 2013 19:33, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > > Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan: > >> I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org. > > > > This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4. > > > > I'd like

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (ensurepip) updated

2013-10-22 Thread Donald Stufft
On Oct 22, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan: >> I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org. > > This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4. > > I'd like to thank Nick for carefully editing this PE

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (ensurepip) updated

2013-10-22 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 22 October 2013 19:33, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan: >> I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org. > > This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4. > > I'd like to thank Nick for carefully editing this PEP, and

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (ensurepip) updated

2013-10-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan: > I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org. This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4. I'd like to thank Nick for carefully editing this PEP, and I'd like to cite it as an archetype for a well-written PEP.

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Switch subprocess stdin to a socketpair, attempting to fix issue #19293 (AIX

2013-10-22 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, Would it be possible to use os.pipe() on all OSes except AIX? Pipes and socket pairs may have minor differences, but some applications may rely on these minor differences. For example, is the buffer size the same? For example, in test.support, we have two constants: PIPE_MAX_SIZE (4 MB) and S