In article <cadisq7fhju328w9cdc1j9eb72najvajhvna++5_w3ryufww...@mail.gmail.com>, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 October 2013 19:33, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: > > Am 20.10.13 14:27, schrieb Nick Coghlan: > >> I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org. > > > > This version looks good to me, and I accept it for inclusion in Python 3.4. > > > > I'd like to thank Nick for carefully editing this PEP, and I'd like to > > cite it as an archetype for a well-written PEP. It's very precise, and > > it elaborates on rejected proposals and the motivation for rejection.
I'd like to second that and thank both Nick and Donald for addressing the concerns I raised. > Thank you! I have updated the PEP to record the acceptance, and > created a tracking issue for the implementation at > http://bugs.python.org/issue19347 > > > I'd also like to thank Donald for pushing this, and for continued work > > on the implementation of the PEP. I see that this all took longer than > > expected (also due to my fault in providing timely reviews). I suggest > > that some of the stuff that needs to be done still is delegated, so that > > Donald doesn't have to do all of it. > > If we could get assistance with the installer and pyvenv updates after > the initial implementation of the module itself is checked in, that > would be a huge help. I'm planning to do the OS X installer support changes. -- Ned Deily, n...@acm.org _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
