Re: pear packages

2008-12-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008/12/14 19:20, LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > On Sunday 14 December 2008 19.11.50 you wrote: > > * LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > What is the way of handling pear package upgrades? Is it safe to > > > use pear upgrade-all, or should one stay with ports, and wait for > > > an update there? >

Re: pear packages

2008-12-14 Thread LÉVAI Dániel
On Sunday 14 December 2008 19.11.50 you wrote: > * LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > > Hi! > > > > What is the way of handling pear package upgrades? Is it safe to > > use pear upgrade-all, or should one stay with ports, and wait for > > an update there? > > I'd suggest to stay with packages. For which packag

Re: pear packages

2008-12-14 Thread Marc Balmer
* LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > Hi! > > What is the way of handling pear package upgrades? Is it safe to use > pear upgrade-all, or should one stay with ports, and wait for an update > there? I'd suggest to stay with packages. For which packages would you need an update, btw? > > Daniel > > -- >

pear packages

2008-12-14 Thread LÉVAI Dániel
Hi! What is the way of handling pear package upgrades? Is it safe to use pear upgrade-all, or should one stay with ports, and wait for an update there? Daniel -- LEVAI Daniel PGP key ID = 0x4AC0A4B1 Key fingerprint = D037 03B9 C12D D338 4412 2D83 1373 917A 4AC0 A4B1