On 2008/12/14 19:20, LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > On Sunday 14 December 2008 19.11.50 you wrote: > > * LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > What is the way of handling pear package upgrades? Is it safe to > > > use pear upgrade-all, or should one stay with ports, and wait for > > > an update there? > > > > I'd suggest to stay with packages. For which packages would you need > > an update, btw? > > > I was just trying to use Fileinfo, which is not in ports, so I had to > mess around with pecl (what is completely new for me), and noticed the > upgrade parameter. I was just simply wondering...
In _most_ cases they're fairly simple to port.
