Re: ldap viewer

2009-10-21 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sat, 15.08.2009 at 20:09:14 +0200, Frank Denis wrote: > Well, there's gq, too. It requires gtk+, but it's less of a monstrosity > than jxplorer. in general, I like gq quite a bit, but it could really use some bug fixes, and appears to be (almost?) unmaintained upstream, too, as far as

Re: ldap viewer

2009-08-17 Thread Jordi Espasa Clofent
Actually, it is. Yep.. my fault. :) -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent

Re: ldap viewer

2009-08-17 Thread Jonathan Armani
Jordi Espasa Clofent a écrit : Marco, ¿Maybe phpldapadmin? Isn't in ports, but is so easy to install. It is : http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/www/phpldapadmin/

Re: ldap viewer

2009-08-17 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: > Marco, > > ¿Maybe phpldapadmin? > Isn't in ports, but is so easy to install. Actually, it is. $ cd /usr/ports/ $ make search name=phpldapadmin Port: phpldapadmin-1.1.0.7p1 Path: www/phpldapadmin Info: web-based LDAP browser to manage LDAP

Re: ldap viewer

2009-08-17 Thread Jordi Espasa Clofent
Marco, ¿Maybe phpldapadmin? Isn't in ports, but is so easy to install. -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent

Re: ldap viewer

2009-08-15 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote: > On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 20:01 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > > > > We really only have jxeplorer in ports to see LDAP goo. jxplorer so fat > > > it's ass is still in last tuesday. jxplorer so fat

Re: ldap viewer

2009-08-15 Thread Stephan A. Rickauer
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 20:01 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > > We really only have jxeplorer in ports to see LDAP goo. jxplorer so fat > > it's ass is still in last tuesday. jxplorer so fat shes on both side of > > the family. You get the picture.

Re: ldap viewer

2009-08-15 Thread Marco Peereboom
I meant with a tree view either gui or ascii. On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 08:01:23PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > > We really only have jxeplorer in ports to see LDAP goo. jxplorer so fat > > it's ass is still in last tuesday. jxplorer so fat shes

Re: ldap viewer

2009-08-15 Thread Frank Denis
Le Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:46:29PM -0500, Marco Peereboom ecrivait : > We really only have jxeplorer in ports to see LDAP goo. > > Anyone got a port of something less of a monstrosity? Well, there's gq, too. It requires gtk+, but it's less of a monstrosity than jxplorer.

Re: ldap viewer

2009-08-15 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Marco Peereboom wrote: > We really only have jxeplorer in ports to see LDAP goo. jxplorer so fat > it's ass is still in last tuesday. jxplorer so fat shes on both side of > the family. You get the picture... > > Anyone got a port of something less of a monstrosity? ldapvi

ldap viewer

2009-08-15 Thread Marco Peereboom
We really only have jxeplorer in ports to see LDAP goo. jxplorer so fat it's ass is still in last tuesday. jxplorer so fat shes on both side of the family. You get the picture... Anyone got a port of something less of a monstrosity?