Hi, On Sat, 15.08.2009 at 20:09:14 +0200, Frank Denis <obsd-t...@pureftpd.org> wrote: > Well, there's gq, too. It requires gtk+, but it's less of a monstrosity > than jxplorer.
in general, I like gq quite a bit, but it could really use some bug fixes, and appears to be (almost?) unmaintained upstream, too, as far as my impression goes. Kind regards, --Toni++
