On 2024/06/06 17:19, Aleksandr Mikhaylov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> There was a windowmaker port update brought here last september,
> https://www.mail-archive.com/ports@openbsd.org/msg120442.html
> but for some reason this still hasn't made it into the ports tree.
>
> Why? Is
Hi.
There was a windowmaker port update brought here last september,
https://www.mail-archive.com/ports@openbsd.org/msg120442.html
but for some reason this still hasn't made it into the ports tree.
Why? Is there any way to bring it in,
because I have to mess around with patches.
Thanks!
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:44:02PM +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Le 21/09/2023 à 16:26, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> > On 2023/09/21 11:40, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> > > Le Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:11:40 +0200,
> > > Joel Carnat a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Hell
Le 21/09/2023 à 16:26, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
On 2023/09/21 11:40, Solene Rapenne wrote:
Le Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:11:40 +0200,
Joel Carnat a écrit :
Hello,
WindowMaker has been updated this summer.
Release note is available here: http://www.windowmaker.org/news/
Find a diff to port
On 2023/09/21 11:40, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> Le Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:11:40 +0200,
> Joel Carnat a écrit :
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > WindowMaker has been updated this summer.
> > Release note is available here: http://www.windowmaker.org/news/
> >
> > Fin
On 2023/09/21 09:55, Michael wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 12:11:40AM +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > WindowMaker has been updated this summer.
> > Release note is available here: http://www.windowmaker.org/news/
> >
> > Find a diff
Le Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:11:40 +0200,
Joel Carnat a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> WindowMaker has been updated this summer.
> Release note is available here: http://www.windowmaker.org/news/
>
> Find a diff to port attached.
> I'm running it on "OpenBSD/amd64 7.4-beta (
> Le 21 sept. 2023 à 09:56, Michael a écrit :
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 12:11:40AM +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> WindowMaker has been updated this summer.
>> Release note is available here: http://www.windowmaker.org/news/
>>
>> Fi
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 12:11:40AM +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> WindowMaker has been updated this summer.
> Release note is available here: http://www.windowmaker.org/news/
>
> Find a diff to port attached.
> I'm running it on "OpenBSD/amd64 7.4-beta (
Hello,
WindowMaker has been updated this summer.
Release note is available here: http://www.windowmaker.org/news/
Find a diff to port attached.
I'm running it on "OpenBSD/amd64 7.4-beta (GENERIC.MP) #1371"
Regards,
Joel C.
ports_x11_windowmaker-0.96.0.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip
This is a simple port of a desktop pager dockapp for WindowMaker and
similar window managers.
I was not sure whether I should send this port, since it is a program
I wrote myself; but it may be useful for other people out there using
WindowMaker, so here's a try. I understand if it wer
base-gcc needs to be told to accept c99. This diff fixes the build on
sparc64.
ok?
(cc maintainer)
--Kurt
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/windowmaker/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.108
diff -u -r1.108 Makefile
Hello ports,
attached is an update to windowmaker 0.95.9.
* Removed some now superfluous patches
* Switched HOMEPAGE to https://
* Taking MAINTAINER
Tested on amd64.
Regards
Michael
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11
No objections, and another confirmation here! Thought I am running OpenBSD
5.9 RELEASE with the ports distributed with that release, the diff still
worked well. I only had 36 lines of Makefile.rej to process from the patch
and I am for the first time since I wanted to in the late 90s using
*drawe
>> > > >> > Since I've just found (by reading your howto about the Lenovo
>> > > >> > Thinkpad
>> > > >> > X1 Carbon) that you're using Window Maker...
>> > > >> > Could you please test the attached diff
>> > Thinkpad
> > > >> > X1 Carbon) that you're using Window Maker...
> > > >> > Could you please test the attached diff that updates our windowmaker
> > > >> > port to its latest release, 0.95.7?
> > > >> >
&
:51PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> > >> > Hi Reyk,
> > >> >
> > >> > Since I've just found (by reading your howto about the Lenovo Thinkpad
> > >> > X1 Carbon) that you're using Window Maker...
> > >> &g
re
> step.
>
>
> using it with GNUstep GWorkspace desktop, works fine so far.
>
> Instead of that tarball, a patch against current ports tree would be better.
Here's a proper diff with some additional fixes.
Works ok for me.
Ciao!
David
Index: Makefile
=
On 02/02/16 23:12, mi...@dataswamp.org wrote:
On 09:53, David Coppa wrote:
If you send me what you have atm, I'll have a look...
Sure, thanks. Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado suggested to remove any pledge()
patches for now so I did that. As I said: I have been using this for the last 3
months
On 09:53, David Coppa wrote:
If you send me what you have atm, I'll have a look...
Sure, thanks.
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado suggested to remove any pledge() patches
for now so I did that. As I said: I have been using this for the last 3
months or so without any issues. Especially I did not
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 10:45 AM, wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Is there currently someone trying to update windowmaker to 0.95.7 ? There
> were several threads regarding new windowmaker versions, the last one was:
> https://marc.info/?t=14260999831&r=1&w=2
> I did not s
Hi there,
Is there currently someone trying to update windowmaker to 0.95.7 ?
There were several threads regarding new windowmaker versions, the last
one was:
https://marc.info/?t=14260999831&r=1&w=2
I did not see any progress since.
I took the 0.95.5 port from openbsd-wip (whic
the last link go,
I'm actually not seeing any of them in Timo's 0.95.5 port that I'm currently
using. No multiple applications spawning from kbd shortcuts after following the
steps you outlined, CPU usage is typically minimal (showing 0.00% for wmaker
process when I run top), and ctrl-alt-b
gard?
>
> Anyway, I was just looking into updating the WindowMaker port, and thought
> I better search the archive beforehand, in case anyone else was doing
> anything with it, and I'm glad I did!
>
> However, nothing seems to have come from the work Timo did over a year ago,
patches to see which ones are
> still needed to make it work.
Yeah it certainly seems like a fair bit more work that the other couple of
extremely basic scripted cli programs I've attempted to port!
> I also haven't used WindowMaker for a while now.
So long as there's no int
Toby Slight writes:
> On 28 January 2014 at 15:51, Timo Myyrä wrote:
>
>> Timo Myyra writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Here's a updated windowmaker port.
>> > Most of the patches appeared to have reached upstream so got deleted
>> &
On 28 January 2014 at 15:51, Timo Myyrä wrote:
> Timo Myyra writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's a updated windowmaker port.
> > Most of the patches appeared to have reached upstream so got deleted
> > in update.
> > For some parts I couldn't
Timo Myyra writes:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a updated windowmaker port.
> Most of the patches appeared to have reached upstream so got deleted
> in update.
> For some parts I couldn't find relevant sections where to apply those
> so I just deleted them.
>
> This is
Hi,
Here's a updated windowmaker port.
Most of the patches appeared to have reached upstream so got deleted in
update.
For some parts I couldn't find relevant sections where to apply those so
I just deleted them.
This is slightly tested on amd64 so could you wider test
Hello,
here is a patch for x11/windowmaker to backport the following commit
from the upstream git repository.
<http://repo.or.cz/w/wmaker-crm.git/commit/7490b14bf0573283cd11eea3b1b6392c6f38e2dd>
Regards,
Christian
Index: Ma
. Especially on i386 since I don't have one of those.
~Brian
Stu
On 03/04/13 10:09, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi ports --
The attached patch updates x11/windowmaker to 0.95.4
Taking MAINTAINER as well.
Works for me on my usual trio (amd64, loongson, macppc)
OK?
~Brian
Is this update is as bad as the last one?
Stu
On 03/04/13 10:09, Brian Callahan wrote:
> Hi ports --
>
> The attached patch updates x11/windowmaker to 0.95.4
> Taking MAINTAINER as well.
> Works for me on my usual trio (amd64, loongson, macppc)
>
> OK?
>
> ~Brian
>
>
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this diff updates WindowMaker 0.92.0 to 0.95.2. Most of the diffs have
> been kindly integrated into 0.95.2 we previously applied to 0.92.0.
> I have contacted the devs to integrate the new diffs -- as
On 2012/04/29 11:07, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> this diff updates WindowMaker 0.92.0 to 0.95.2. Most of the diffs have
> been kindly integrated into 0.95.2 we previously applied to 0.92.0.
> I have contacted the devs to integrate the new diffs -- as far as possible.
>
> Tested on
Hi,
this diff updates WindowMaker 0.92.0 to 0.95.2. Most of the diffs have
been kindly integrated into 0.95.2 we previously applied to 0.92.0.
I have contacted the devs to integrate the new diffs -- as far as possible.
Tested on my i386 machine, broad testing greatly appreciated! Especially
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Bryan Linton wrote:
> The only bug in 0.92 I encountered was the "periodic focus bug".
> If it were patched away, there would not be any bugs in the older
> release that affected me.
>
> Patch attached. (I think I did this right, someone should
> probably double-
On 03/16/12 21:40, Bryan Linton wrote:
> On 2012-03-16 12:08:30, David Coppa wrote:
>> So... What should I do with this update?
>>
>
> Hmm, my opinion is to hold off and wait for a newer version that
> will hopefully be more stable than this one. I'm probably going
> to switch back to 0.92 becau
ht, someone should
probably double-check.)
--
Bryan
Index: Makefile
=======
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/windowmaker/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.81
diff -u -p -r1.81 Makefile
--- Makefile16 Sep 2011 12:29:17 - 1.81
+++ Makefile17 Mar 2012 01:31:47 -000
I repeat steps 1-3, three windows will spawn. Repeat again and
> four windows will spawn etc. (I stopped after getting five to
> spawn at once).
>
>
> Two other bugs that happened that I have not been able to
> reproduce since running 0.95.2 are as follows.
>
> I had Windo
s well.
>>>
>>
>> I spoke too soon. WindowMaker ran fine for about a day, then all
>> of a sudden ctrl+u started spawning two xterms. I can't think of
>> anything I did which may have caused this. It seemed like it
>> happened out of the blue.
>>
>&g
On Sun, 04 Mar 2012, Bryan Linton wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 16:27:50, Bryan Linton wrote:
> >
> > Also, I noticed that the problem I had with the double spawning
> > of xterms when I press ctrl+u is fixed as well.
> >
>
> I spoke too soon. WindowMaker ran fine
a
> minor annoyance and something that I assume will be fixed in a
> future update of WindowMaker.
For the other problems, please report them to upstream if you can/want to...
Ciao,
David
On 2012-03-04 16:27:50, Bryan Linton wrote:
>
> Also, I noticed that the problem I had with the double spawning
> of xterms when I press ctrl+u is fixed as well.
>
I spoke too soon. WindowMaker ran fine for about a day, then all
of a sudden ctrl+u started spawning two xterms. I
ber if it was
double-spawning before I tried to launch Wesnoth or only after.
Windows still "roll" up and down with an animation even though I
have animations disabled in my preferences but this is only a
minor annoyance and something that I assume will be fixed in a
future update of Wi
f in WindowMaker's preferences app,
double-clicking window titles "rolled" the window up and down
smoothly instead of instantly {dis,re}appearing.
I'm very happy to see WindowMaker getting active development and
that you've taken the time to update the port, but with the
l+u would open two xterms instead of a
single one.
One final issue I saw was that despite the fact that I have all
animations turned off in WindowMaker's preferences app,
double-clicking window titles "rolled" the window up and down
smoothly instead of instantly {dis,re}appeari
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:19:38 +0100, David Coppa wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
On 2012/03/02 15:49, David Coppa wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> There are trailing ^M in the patch in CVS which aren't making it
> through emai
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012/03/02 15:49, David Coppa wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Stuart Henderson
>> wrote:
>> > There are trailing ^M in the patch in CVS which aren't making it
>> > through email.
>>
>> Ah, ok.
>>
>> There's the one attached n
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> There are trailing ^M in the patch in CVS which aren't making it
> through email.
Ah, ok.
There's the one attached not-inline btw...
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:35:31 +0100, David Coppa wrote:
Hi,
This diff updates WindowMaker to its latest version: 0.95.2.
Yes, development has started again after so many years...
Please test and comment. I'm not CCing maintainer since he's
no more a openbsd dev.
Ciao
David
Inde
> Revision 1.4 of x11/windowmaker/patches/patch-WINGs_string_c uncovered
> a bug in WPrefs, WindowMaker's configuration tool. The bug can be easily
> triggered by choosing the 'Applications Menu Definition' dialogue.
>
> The problem is that WPrefs code relied on the
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Pedro Martelletto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Revision 1.4 of x11/windowmaker/patches/patch-WINGs_string_c uncovered
> a bug in WPrefs, WindowMaker's configuration tool. The bug can be easily
> triggered by choosing the 'Applications
Hi,
Revision 1.4 of x11/windowmaker/patches/patch-WINGs_string_c uncovered
a bug in WPrefs, WindowMaker's configuration tool. The bug can be easily
triggered by choosing the 'Applications Menu Definition' dialogue.
The problem is that WPrefs code relied on the fact that the fir
In patch-WindowMaker_menu WPrefs gives error if executed,
a patch is attached.
Bye
Giovanni
diff -ruNx CVS x11/windowmaker/Makefile mystuff/x11/windowmaker/Makefile
--- x11/windowmaker/MakefileSun Apr 8 18:33:41 2007
+++ mystuff/x11/windowmaker/MakefileWed Apr 25 12:39:24 2007
@@ -5,7
On 10/15/06, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why is xinerama a flavor for windowmaker ?
All other gui stuff in the tree does xinerama, all the time, these days.
No kidding. If it doesn't break single-head, turn it on by default.
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:12:25AM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> claudio and I would like to add the xinerama FLAVOR of x11/windowmaker
> to the x11 Makefile so that it gets built during bulk builds (as we both
> use dual head displays and, obviously, windowmaker):
>
> ok?
>
claudio and I would like to add the xinerama FLAVOR of x11/windowmaker
to the x11 Makefile so that it gets built during bulk builds (as we both
use dual head displays and, obviously, windowmaker):
ok?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file
* Nikolay Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060402 11:23]:
> * Jim Razmus [2006-04-02]:
> > Beat me with a clue stick. What am I missing?
>
> things like x11/windowmaker/Makefile:
>
> HOMEPAGE= http://www.windowmaker.org/
>
> Nikolay
>
Doh! Fixed.
* Jim Razmus [2006-04-02]:
> Beat me with a clue stick. What am I missing?
things like x11/windowmaker/Makefile:
HOMEPAGE= http://www.windowmaker.org/
Nikolay
g URLs should be updated to
> windowmaker.info, no?
>
> Nikolay
>
Correct! The only ports that use MASTER_SITE_WINDOWMAKER are:
devel/libproplist - ${MASTER_SITE_WINDOWMAKER:=libs/}
graphics/wmicons - ${MASTER_SITE_WINDOWMAKER:=contrib/old/icons/}
x11/windowmaker - ${MASTER_SITE_WINDOW
* Jim Razmus [2006-04-02]:
> The following patch honors the admins request by removing all mirrors
> and updating .org to .info in network.conf.template. It also brings
In this case all windowmaker.org URLs should be updated to
windowmaker.info, no?
Nikolay
Window Maker server admin is encouraging us to "retire/remove references
to mirrors and outdated directories like contrib and libs". Three of
the mirrors in network.conf.template were failing entirely.
Additionally, ftp.windowmaker.info only hosts the dist files for
x11/windowmak
I wrote:
Hi,
this is a minimal patch to fix the most visible issues on 64 bits
architectures (problems caused by the weird XGetProperty() API).
Here's an updated patch, which also fixes WMPrefs startup.
--
Matthieu
? log
Index: patches/patch-WINGs_wwi
Hi,
this is a minimal patch to fix the most visible issues on 64 bits
architectures (problems caused by the weird XGetProperty() API).
There are more similar problems in the code, but my previous attempt
(for Windowmaker 0.91) to fix them all at once by more or less brute
force introduced
64 matches
Mail list logo
