Sorry for my fault, OpenBSD 4.4 on amd64 have 0 failures in 'make regress':
212 tests, 1440 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
+1 to commit (if my voice counts :)
2008/9/17 Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/9/17 Stefan Sperling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 03:48:04PM +0
2008/9/17 Stefan Sperling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 03:48:04PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:06:47AM -0600, Brad Walker wrote:
>> > I've attached a patch that solves the bindings issue and another issue
>> > with building the apache v2.2 modules. I
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 03:48:04PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:06:47AM -0600, Brad Walker wrote:
> > I've attached a patch that solves the bindings issue and another issue
> > with building the apache v2.2 modules. It's also available @
> > http://bradmwalker.com/
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:06:47AM -0600, Brad Walker wrote:
> I've attached a patch that solves the bindings issue and another issue
> with building the apache v2.2 modules. It's also available @
> http://bradmwalker.com/ports/subversion-1.5.2.diff
> The port fixes SWIG bindings by regenerati
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:07:19PM -0600, Brad Walker wrote:
I'm running a slightly modified version of this (updated for 1.5.2).
Running Trac-0.11.1 segfaults for me on loading py-subversion.
Does any of these commands segfault anyone's machine?
import libsvn.wc
impor
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:07:19PM -0600, Brad Walker wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:14:34AM +0300, Valery Masiutsin wrote:
Hello !
I was in need of subversion update to work with 1.5
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:14:34AM +0300, Valery Masiutsin wrote:
Hello !
I was in need of subversion update to work with 1.5 repos, so i've made one.
Status - everything builds and packages just fine, sv
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 09:43:22AM +0800, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> Some folks stick to 1.4, would not upgrade shortly.
>
> If use 1.5 client, their work copy will automatic upgrade to 1.5,
> and can't use 1.4 client anymore.
That is correct. The 1.5 client will auto-upgrade working copies
to the
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:49:05PM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> Steven Mestdagh [2008-09-02, 09:33:07]:
> > Here is a diff for 1.5.2. Haven't tested it yet beyond building...
> > It picks up cyrus sasl if installed, should we enable that by default?
>
> 4 of the 61 tests are failing for me on
Some folks stick to 1.4, would not upgrade shortly.
If use 1.5 client, their work copy will automatic upgrade to 1.5,
and can't use 1.4 client anymore.
2008/9/3 Steven Mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dongsheng Song [2008-09-02, 17:57:38]:
>> Could you support both 1.4 & 1.5, like jdk ?
>
> why?
Guys,
I think someone needs to point out the no_bindings and no_ap2 flavors.
With that most problems are solved, I suspect ;-)
--
Todd Fries .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
| \ 1.636.410.0632 (voice)
| Free Daemon
Steven Mestdagh [2008-09-02, 09:33:07]:
> Here is a diff for 1.5.2. Haven't tested it yet beyond building...
> It picks up cyrus sasl if installed, should we enable that by default?
4 of the 61 tests are failing for me on amd64, this is the main stuff, not
bindings.
FAIL: commit_tests.py 44: se
Stuart Henderson [2008-09-02, 12:20:00]:
> On 2008/09/02 12:56, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Yes, keep SASL. svnserve needs it.
>
> If it would reduce the list of dependencies for the client, I'd be very
> keen to have the client and server split into separate multi-packages.
Looks like both client
Dongsheng Song [2008-09-02, 17:57:38]:
> Could you support both 1.4 & 1.5, like jdk ?
why?
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:20:00PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/09/02 12:56, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 09:33:07AM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> > > Here is a diff for 1.5.2. Haven't tested it yet beyond building...
> > > It picks up cyrus sasl if installed, s
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:14:15PM +0200, viq wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:23:31AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2008/09/02 17:57, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > > > Could you support both 1.4 & 1.5, like jdk ?
> > >
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:20:00PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/09/02 12:56, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 09:33:07AM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> > > Here is a diff for 1.5.2. Haven't tested it yet beyond building...
> > > It picks up cyrus sasl if installed, s
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:14:15PM +0200, viq wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:23:31AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2008/09/02 17:57, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > > Could you support both 1.4 & 1.5, like jdk ?
> >
> > there is a very good reason for doing this with jdk. reading the
> > re
On 2008/09/02 12:56, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 09:33:07AM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> > Here is a diff for 1.5.2. Haven't tested it yet beyond building...
> > It picks up cyrus sasl if installed, should we enable that by default?
>
> Yes, keep SASL. svnserve needs it.
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:23:31AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/09/02 17:57, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > Could you support both 1.4 & 1.5, like jdk ?
>
> there is a very good reason for doing this with jdk. reading the
> release notes for Subversion, it seems this is not necessary here:-
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 09:33:07AM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> Here is a diff for 1.5.2. Haven't tested it yet beyond building...
> It picks up cyrus sasl if installed, should we enable that by default?
Yes, keep SASL. svnserve needs it.
Stefan
On 2008/09/02 17:57, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> Could you support both 1.4 & 1.5, like jdk ?
there is a very good reason for doing this with jdk. reading the
release notes for Subversion, it seems this is not necessary here:-
| "Older clients and servers interoperate transparently with 1.5 servers
|
Could you support both 1.4 & 1.5, like jdk ?
2008/9/2 Steven Mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Valery Masiutsin [2008-08-26, 09:55:23]:
>> Hello
>>
>> > The bindings tests pass for you?
>> >
>> > Do you see any errors like I described here?
>> > http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName
Valery Masiutsin [2008-08-26, 09:55:23]:
> Hello
>
> > The bindings tests pass for you?
> >
> > Do you see any errors like I described here?
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=dev&msgNo=142053
> >
> It takes long for tests to pass even on fast amd64, have had no chance
> to
Hello
> The bindings tests pass for you?
>
> Do you see any errors like I described here?
> http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=dev&msgNo=142053
>
It takes long for tests to pass even on fast amd64, have had no chance
to check all tests yesterday,
i've just started with fixing f
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 02:10:03AM +0300, Valery Masiutsin wrote:
> Hello, guys !
>
> Here is an updated diff.
> What was done:
> WRKBUILD variable has been added to make flags, i've patched some of
> python scripts to use it, now most of tests in do-regress target pass
> fine, however i did not
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 06:34:43PM +0200, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> I'll look at your submissions later this week.
Great, thanks!
> Let's get it updated first before working on any java additions.
Maybe we can update it without any bindings support at all for now?
Or mark the binding subpackages
Stefan Sperling [2008-08-25, 12:15:33]:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:14:34AM +0300, Valery Masiutsin wrote:
> > Hello !
> >
> > I was in need of subversion update to work with 1.5 repos, so i've made
> > one.
> > Status - everything builds and packages just fine, svn client works fine,
> > test
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Brad Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 12:16 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>
>> SO_VERSION=1.0
>> SVN_LIBS= svn_client-1 svn_delta-1 svn_diff-1 svn_fs-1 \
>> - svn_fs_base-1 svn_fs_fs-1 svn_ra-1 svn_ra_dav-1 \
>> -
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 12:16 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> SO_VERSION=1.0
> SVN_LIBS= svn_client-1 svn_delta-1 svn_diff-1 svn_fs-1 \
> - svn_fs_base-1 svn_fs_fs-1 svn_ra-1 svn_ra_dav-1 \
> - svn_ra_local-1 svn_ra_svn-1 svn_repos-1 svn_subr-1
> svn_wc-1
>
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:14:34AM +0300, Valery Masiutsin wrote:
> > Hello !
> >
> > I was in need of subversion update to work with 1.5 repos, so i've made
> > one.
> > Status - everything builds and packages just fine, svn cl
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:14:34AM +0300, Valery Masiutsin wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I was in need of subversion update to work with 1.5 repos, so i've made one.
> Status - everything builds and packages just fine, svn client works fine,
> tested on amd64.
> However language bindings, need more atten
Hello !
I was in need of subversion update to work with 1.5 repos, so i've made one.
Status - everything builds and packages just fine, svn client works fine,
tested on amd64.
However language bindings, need more attention and clean-up.
Comments are welcome.
Regards Valery.
Index: Makefile
=
33 matches
Mail list logo
