Stuart Henderson [2008-09-02, 12:20:00]: > On 2008/09/02 12:56, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > Yes, keep SASL. svnserve needs it. > > If it would reduce the list of dependencies for the client, I'd be very > keen to have the client and server split into separate multi-packages.
Looks like both client and server get linked against libsasl2. > Having to install apache2 and SASL is slightly annoying if all you're > trying to do is pull source from some project that doesn't bother to > release proper tarballs :-) Huh? You don't have to install apache2. I see no reason to split it.
