Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

2024-10-02 Thread Christian Schulte
On 10/2/24 20:19, Anon Loli wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 07:25:30PM +0100, Zé Loff wrote: >>> Let's say that autistici.org has some sort of filter, why the fuck does it >>> not >>> check if SENDER_MAIL and RECEIVER_MAIL match and just not ban my own ass? >>> ._. >>> >>> Kirill told me in a pr

Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

2024-10-02 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 20:19:26 +0200, Anon Loli wrote: > > So you say that autistici.org conforms to this bullshit probably because of > those entities? > I thought that Autistici was some sort of political rebellion, what the fuck > am > I doing with my life? > I have no idea that are you doing

Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

2024-10-02 Thread Anon Loli
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 07:25:30PM +0100, Zé Loff wrote: > > Let's say that autistici.org has some sort of filter, why the fuck does it > > not > > check if SENDER_MAIL and RECEIVER_MAIL match and just not ban my own ass? > > ._. > > > > Kirill told me in a private e-mail that I banned myself? >

Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

2024-10-01 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024, 11:12 Anon Loli wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 09:45:37PM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 21:38:30 +0200, > > Zé Loff wrote: > > > > > > > > > From your original message's headers, delivered to my mail server: > > > > > > Received: from mail.op

Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

2024-10-01 Thread Zé Loff
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 04:48:34PM +, Anon Loli wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 09:45:37PM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 21:38:30 +0200, > > Zé Loff wrote: > > > > > > > > > From your original message's headers, delivered to my mail server: > > > > > > Receiv

Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

2024-10-01 Thread Anon Loli
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 09:45:37PM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 21:38:30 +0200, > Zé Loff wrote: > > > > > > From your original message's headers, delivered to my mail server: > > > > Received: from mail.openbsd.org (mail.openbsd.org [199.185.178.25]) > > by ma

Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

2024-09-30 Thread Zé Loff
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 05:54:51PM +, Anon Loli wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 07:31:54PM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:25:15 +0200, > > Anon Loli wrote: > > > > > > The yt-dlp port simply stops working for it's primary use, which is > > > YouTube > > > stuff.

Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

2024-09-30 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 21:38:30 +0200, Zé Loff wrote: > > > From your original message's headers, delivered to my mail server: > > Received: from mail.openbsd.org (mail.openbsd.org [199.185.178.25]) > by mail.phistat.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPS id 8914e035 > (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA38

Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

2024-09-30 Thread Anon Loli
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 05:55:05PM +, Anon Loli wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 07:31:54PM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:25:15 +0200, > > Anon Loli wrote: > > > > > > The yt-dlp port simply stops working for it's primary use, which is > > > YouTube > > > stuff.

Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

2024-09-30 Thread Anon Loli
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 07:31:54PM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:25:15 +0200, > Anon Loli wrote: > > > > The yt-dlp port simply stops working for it's primary use, which is YouTube > > stuff. > > It stops working after a few months, so it needs to be updated to the las

Re: yt-dlp can't be outdated on non-current

2024-09-29 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:25:15 +0200, Anon Loli wrote: > > The yt-dlp port simply stops working for it's primary use, which is YouTube > stuff. > It stops working after a few months, so it needs to be updated to the last > release as soon as possible. > I don't know exactly why things with YouTube