On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 07:25:30PM +0100, Zé Loff wrote: > > Let's say that autistici.org has some sort of filter, why the fuck does it > > not > > check if SENDER_MAIL and RECEIVER_MAIL match and just not ban my own ass? > > ._. > > > > Kirill told me in a private e-mail that I banned myself? > > How the fuck did I ban myself? Have I this entire time been tempbanned by > > autistici.org, the e-mail service which I use, rather than the OpenBSD > > moderators? > > Instead of lobbing banning and censorship accusations back and forth, > just check the archives: > > https://marc.info/?w=2&r=1&s=anon+loli&q=a > > If its there, the list(s) got it. If you didn't, that's your problem.
I seem to have problems with autistici.org, as well as have been censored. Soo double trouble. > I'm not sure if this is what Kirill meant, but you might want to do a > quick search for "mailing lists and DMARC" and do some reading. In > short, when you send an email to a mailing list, the list's server > probably rewrites some headers, which breaks DKIM, if the original > message had it, and probably breaks SPF, since in all likelihood, the > mailing list's server (the one that sends out the message to all > subscribers) isn't listed as an authorized sender for your domain. > > Now if your domain's DMARC policy is p=reject (which it is, as Kirill > showed you), then all MTAs that do DMARC filtering will... you guessed > it: reject an email that comes from an unauthorized MX (i.e. that fails > SPF). > > I guess that either for this or for some other reason, autistici.org is > blocking mails from @autistici.org that come from somewhere else other > than autisici.org's on MXs. And this includes messages sent by the > mailing list server on your behalf. That's why you don't receive them. > > So, apparently no one is banning or censoring you in particular. That is retarded as fuck, like I have previously exclaimed. That's a bummer, but I shall bookmark that link thou gave. And as previously said, I have been censored regardless of that, I can't find my e-mails explaining why we should stick to C or at least C++ dependencies since we already have them, a big example being: librsvg - (the shit thing that I would love to get (re?)replaced, as it uses *drums please* RuSt, but also fucking Python as well as some thing called Vala? 3 PL? Seriously? and the rest of retarded amount of dependencies? libsvgtiny - what about this? It's in C, as well as smol dependencies? I attempted giving a enormous explanation as to why NOT to use Rust, or anything besides C/C++ while I was at it (but specifically rust), and I was denied every time. I really want to love OpenBSD for what it is, and it's community (port maintainers, etc.), but I left FreeBSD because of many reasons, the tipping point being Rustification of every.fucking.port. I can convince you to not shill Rust if the moderators were to have given me a chance. > P.S.: forward any complaints about SPF, DKIM and DMARC to Google, > Microsoft and other big players that keep pushing for "security" > mechanisms that are designed to make it increasingly difficult not to > use their services. I believe that is not in their best interest :-). I can sing you for 5 days about why and how such corporate entities reign over our miserable lives. It is in their interest to make us dependent on them, one way or another. So you say that autistici.org conforms to this bullshit probably because of those entities? I thought that Autistici was some sort of political rebellion, what the fuck am I doing with my life? Thanks for everything. And please do not forgive my unusual way of conversing, instead get used to it and with time you'll love it :D it's easier.
