Yes, I sort of agree, but personally I will run with this meanwhile. I
now recall what it was that made me do this: wasm. The wasm-pack system
requires the version of rustc to match with the wasm32-unknown-unknown
target, and I thought it better (read: easier :-) )to use the published
target i
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 07:52:21AM +0100, Niklas Hallqvist wrote:
> As a matter of fact I did the same update just a week ago, and ended up in
> exactly the same patch set as you, except for one thing:
>
> The version reported by 'rust -V' normally include the git hash and date, and
> some rust
As a matter of fact I did the same update just a week ago, and ended up in
exactly the same patch set as you, except for one thing:
The version reported by 'rust -V' normally include the git hash and date, and
some rust code out there depends on it (maybe dumb, but nevertheless it is).
I did it
On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 12:30:09PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
Hello Sebastien,
> Here the diff for updating lang/rust to 1.39.0
This works well for my Rust code. I've also tested all the subpackages
successfully: rustfmt, Clippy, and rust-gdb (I didn't even realise there was
a subpackage for
On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 12:30:09PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here the diff for updating lang/rust to 1.39.0
>
> The patch took more time than expected to be done: I had problem with sparc64
> and I only achieved to have a workaround in order to avoid a SEGFAULT during
> the
> build
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 02:13:47PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:53:54PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >
> > > A possible way could be:
> > > - having a sub-package -libstd on lang/rust (which would be empty or
> > > almost)
> > > - add RUN_DEPENDS+=lang/rust,-li
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:53:54PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > A possible way could be:
> > - having a sub-package -libstd on lang/rust (which would be empty or almost)
> > - add RUN_DEPENDS+=lang/rust,-libstd to port using rustc
> >
> > when lang/rust is updated, the subpackage rust-l
On 2018/09/25 16:50, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:20:34PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2018/09/24 09:04, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here an update for lang/rust 1.29.1.
> > >
> > > It is a security update (only -current is affected).
> >
> > Hi,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:20:34PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/09/24 09:04, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here an update for lang/rust 1.29.1.
> >
> > It is a security update (only -current is affected).
>
> Hi, I'm wondering if we need to bump REVISION for ports built with
On 2018/09/24 09:04, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here an update for lang/rust 1.29.1.
>
> It is a security update (only -current is affected).
Hi, I'm wondering if we need to bump REVISION for ports built with rust
(firefox, librsvg, etc) to ensure that they're updated for people running
pk
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:40:16AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here an update for lang/rust 1.25.0
>
> Some changes port wise:
> - in order to keep RUST_BACKTRACE=1 during build, properly separate
> MAKE_ENV and TEST_ENV, by introduce a TEST_BIN variable used for
> launching rustb
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 07:45:48AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 01:24:27PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following diff update lang/rust to 1.24.
> >
> > Tests that was done:
> > - build on i386 - but it seems the memory usage still grow. I added a
> >
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:03:47PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
Hello Sebastien,
> It seems that the uploaded file is truncated in some way.
>
> $ tar zft rustc-bootstrap-amd64-1.24.0-20180213.tar.gz >/dev/null
> gzip: stdin: Input/output error
> tar: End of archive volume 1 reached
>
> distin
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 01:24:27PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following diff update lang/rust to 1.24.
>
> Tests that was done:
> - build on i386 - but it seems the memory usage still grow. I added a
> new knob to try to reduce it. I was able to build but after several
> trie
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:11:44AM +, Laurence Tratt wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 01:24:27PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
>
> Hello Sebastien,
>
> > The following diff update lang/rust to 1.24.
>
> Thanks for this! I had a couple of problems. First the distinfo seems to be
> out of date
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 01:24:27PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
Hello Sebastien,
> The following diff update lang/rust to 1.24.
Thanks for this! I had a couple of problems. First the distinfo seems to be
out of date? I got this error from fetch:
>> Size does not match for rust/rustc-bootstra
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 06:10:43AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:27:16PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following diff updates lang/rust to 1.23 (released since approx 3
> > weeks).
> >
> > I was still able to build it on i386 (but with effort), so I
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:27:16PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following diff updates lang/rust to 1.23 (released since approx 3
> weeks).
>
> I was still able to build it on i386 (but with effort), so I keep it
> BROKEN-i386.
>
> The diff was tested on amd64:
> - lang/rust bui
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:48:18 +0200, Sebastien Marie
wrote:
> Here an update for lang/rust 1.20
Committed, thanks!
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:09:17PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following diff updates rustc to 1.19.0.
>
updated diff to be in sync with latest changes on lang/rust.
Thanks.
--
Sebastien Marie
Index: devel/Makefile
==
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 05:01:34PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:16:09PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > Thanks for catching it edd@ !
>
> No worries!
>
> I've now managed to update rust and cargo. I think I've found a
> regression in cargo here:
>
> ---8<---
> wilfred
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:16:09PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Thanks for catching it edd@ !
No worries!
I've now managed to update rust and cargo. I think I've found a
regression in cargo here:
---8<---
wilfred> rm -rf ~/.cargo
wilfred> cargo install --verbose rustfmt
Updating registry
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:57:33AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> I got the sources fine, but I'm unable to get the cargo bootstrap:
>
> >> Fetch
> >> http://kapouay.odns.fr/pub/rust/cargo-bootstrap-amd64-0.18.0-20170426.tar.gz
> ftp: Error retrieving file: 404 Not Found
>
hep,
Hi Sebastien,
Again, thanks for working on Rust.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 08:49:03AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
>
> Please note that as the release isn't officially published at time of
> writing, MASTER_SITES should point to
> https://dev-static.rust-lang.org/dist/ to grab the tarball. Maybe w
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 02:01:55PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
>
> > Below an updated diff for lang/rust (with docs). Please test it, I could
> > mess myself with the revert of -doc removal.
>
> Looks good. A couple of very small comments inline, but this is pretty
> much good to commit IMO.
>
> >
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 04:50:02PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> For now, the following trick seems to work: I added a link at configure
> stage in bootstrap directory to ${WRKDIR}/stage2/rustdoc. The link is
> dangled at beginning. But as docs are built after binaries, a working
> rustdoc i
Hi,
Here a new diff for lang/rust with -doc subpackage.
The way it is done is different from edd@ proposal. Below the
explanation.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:12:51PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
>
> The diff I had been preparing today simply added back rustdoc into the
> bootstrap. rustdoc is (unc
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:22:05PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> From what i understand, it's more work to keep rustdoc in the bootstrap
> so that we can generate the docs at package build time.
Well, time to cut my losses.
The diff I had been preparing today simply added back rustdoc into t
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:28:53AM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:11:29PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:43:58PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:55:26PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How about a separa
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:11:29PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:43:58PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:55:26PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > >
> > > How about a separate port for docs that depends on lang/rust? Would that
> > > be more palata
Hi Sebastien,
Sorry this is dragging on a bit.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:43:58PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:55:26PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> >
> > How about a separate port for docs that depends on lang/rust? Would that
> > be more palatable?
>
> I assume it
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:55:26PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 04:40:27PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > so the bootstrap archive will look like really a full package.
>
> How about a separate port for docs that depends on lang/rust? Would that
> be more palatable?
>
I
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 04:40:27PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> so the bootstrap archive will look like really a full package.
How about a separate port for docs that depends on lang/rust? Would that
be more palatable?
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:03:11PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
>
> > It merges -main and -doc, and doesn't provide documentation anymore.
>
> I was meant to pipe up in the other thread, but I think the docs
> sub-package is actually a nice addition, as it means I always have the
> right docs for th
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:03:11PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> As always, thanks for your hard work on Rust/OpenBSD.
>
> Looks good to me. A couple of comments inline.
Ah also, there's some trailing whitespace in the Makefile. We could kill
this with a separate commit.
--
Best Regards
Edd Barre
Hi Sebastien,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:34:52PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> The following diff updates lang/rust to 1.16.0.
As always, thanks for your hard work on Rust/OpenBSD.
Looks good to me. A couple of comments inline.
> It merges -main and -doc, and doesn't provide documentation any
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:06:56AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 08:56:32AM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here an update to lang/rust to the upcoming 1.14.0 version (should be
> > released today).
>
> Dunno if that was a final tarball or not but i had to re
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 08:56:32AM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here an update to lang/rust to the upcoming 1.14.0 version (should be
> released today).
Dunno if that was a final tarball or not but i had to regen distinfo.
-SHA256 (rust/rustc-1.14.0-src.tar.gz) =
R6Ts0bG6NmaWwTNk2iE+
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:00:45 +0100, Sebastien Marie
wrote:
> Here an update for lang/rust to 1.13.0
It's ok danj@ (I'm not really quick, I got premium access to the
diff ;)).
Cheers,
Daniel
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:14:53 +0200, Sebastien Marie
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here an update for lang/rust.
>
> For release note see
> https://blog.rust-lang.org/2016/10/20/Rust-1.12.1.html. For the full
> change see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37173.
>
> Please note I rebuilded the bootstra
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:20:50 +0200, Sebastien Marie
wrote:
> Here an update for lang/rust to 1.12.0
make fake and make test are fine
for make package, in semarie's diff there is
+share/doc/rust/html/error-index.md
which is not present. I removed this line and it packages fine.
I attach the new
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:45:56AM -0700, Aaron Bieber wrote:
>
> Sebastien Marie writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Today is the release date for rustc 1.7.0.
> >
> > So here an update for lang/rust.
> >
> > OK ?
>
> Are you able to build openbsd-wip/devel/cargo/bootstrap with this? It
> fails for me.
Sebastien Marie writes:
> Hi,
>
> Today is the release date for rustc 1.7.0.
>
> So here an update for lang/rust.
>
> OK ?
Are you able to build openbsd-wip/devel/cargo/bootstrap with this? It
fails for me.
Sebastien Marie writes:
> Hi,
>
> Here an update for lang/rust for the upcoming 1.6.0 (scheduled for
> stable release January 21, 2016).
>
> The backported patches for build system are updated.
>
> All tests passes.
>
> I also ensured that openbsd-wip/devel/cargo/bootstrap (which depends on
> lan
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 04:49:08PM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
Hello Michael,
> It's hard to find a big stress-tester program to build without Cargo.
Steven McDonald is working on a Cargo port, which is in openbsd-wip. It's
more than good enough to compile every Rust program I've chucked at
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 04:49:08PM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here a patch for updating lang/rust to latest stable version: 1.4.0
> >
> > Testing would be welcome.
> >
> > An intermittent failure on `net::addr::tests::to_socket_addr_str_bad'
> > tes
Tested here on amd64 as well. Looks good to me.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 4:52 PM Michael McConville wrote:
> Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here a patch for updating lang/rust to latest stable version: 1.4.0
> >
> > Testing would be welcome.
> >
> > An intermittent failure on `net::addr::t
Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here a patch for updating lang/rust to latest stable version: 1.4.0
>
> Testing would be welcome.
>
> An intermittent failure on `net::addr::tests::to_socket_addr_str_bad'
> test is possible. It isn't a regress (this problem seems to be present
> long time ago),
48 matches
Mail list logo
