On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:03:11PM +0000, Edd Barrett wrote: > > > It merges -main and -doc, and doesn't provide documentation anymore. > > I was meant to pipe up in the other thread, but I think the docs > sub-package is actually a nice addition, as it means I always have the > right docs for the version I have installed. I think I'd forget to > download the docs again when a new version comes out. > > (and like Laurie, I use trains quite a lot)
the main problem with shipping doc subpackages is now it requires rustdoc binary to be present in the bootstrap archive too. so the bootstrap archive will look like really a full package. > > The diff includes REVISION bump for devel/cargo and textproc/ripgrep. > > Not an immediate problem, but what are you going to do when we have 300 > rust apps in-tree? We can't manually bump every time, can we? we will do as we do for others packages like python or perl: bump all dependencies when it is required. the bump is need because of @pkgpath change (due to subpackage removal). a regular update doesn't require this kind of bump. > > ++ /// ```no_run > > + /// use std::os::unix::net::UnixDatagram; > > + /// use std::time::Duration; > > Should you raise a bug upstream for these tests? no as it would be pointless without patches for proper support of OpenBSD. We are tier-3, so no tests (or even just build) are done on OpenBSD. -- Sebastien Marie
