> -- Original Message --
> From: Stuart Henderson
> Date: May 5, 2017 at 2:15 AM
> There is a thing called TH3 that tests the built library, this would seem
> more like what we'd want to use, but it's proprietary.
>From the sqlite3 site:
Even though open-source users do not have
On 2017/05/04 17:52, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> > The mailed diff doesn't apply..(webmail word-wrapping?)
> > Reads OK though.
>
> Grr. Most likely the new webmail client I'm using.
> Thanks.
>
> > Makes sense, "pkglocate lib/tcl/|fgrep .so." finds a few more instances,
> > should they be converted
> The mailed diff doesn't apply..(webmail word-wrapping?)
> Reads OK though.
Grr. Most likely the new webmail client I'm using.
Thanks.
> Makes sense, "pkglocate lib/tcl/|fgrep .so." finds a few more instances,
> should they be converted too?
Probably yes. I'll look into it further.
btw, I not
On 2017/05/04 08:31, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> ping
>
> > -- Original Message --
> > From: Stuart Cassoff <3...@bell.net>
> > Date: April 28, 2017 at 10:30 PM
> >
> >
> > Update to same version as sqlite3.
> > This is a loadable lib; don't treat it as a linkable lib.
> > I can take
ping
> -- Original Message --
> From: Stuart Cassoff <3...@bell.net>
> Date: April 28, 2017 at 10:30 PM
>
>
> Update to same version as sqlite3.
> This is a loadable lib; don't treat it as a linkable lib.
> I can take maintainership.
>
> Stu
>
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
Here's a diff for 3.7.4 based on Landry's.
There's not much difference between 3.7.3 and 3.7.4.
Looks ok on a quick test run.
Stu
Index: databases/sqlite3/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/sqlite3/Makefile,v
retrieving revis
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 06:07:09PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010/11/25 22:38, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Here's a diff that applies..
> >
> > regress tests on sparc64:
> > 52 errors out of 121543 tests
> > Failures on these tests: backup2-10 e_expr-31.2.4 wal-18.2.3.1.5
> > wal-18.2.3.2.5
On 2010/11/25 22:38, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Here's a diff that applies..
>
> regress tests on sparc64:
> 52 errors out of 121543 tests
> Failures on these tests: backup2-10 e_expr-31.2.4 wal-18.2.3.1.5
> wal-18.2.3.2.5 wal-18.2.3.3.5 wal-18.2.4.1.5 wal-18.2.4.2.5
> wal-18.2.4.3.5 wal-18.2.5.1.5 wa
Updated to 3.7.3.
Cleaned out some port cruft, some enhancements come from my earlier work.
Enabled soundex, rtree, fts3.
Port Makefile still sloppy, contains comments
and lists some CFLAGS that others may want to try out.
Leaving the Makefile cleanup for another pass once things are working.
ICU n
IMO it would be a good idea to switch to the pre-processed sqlite
amalgamation and TEA tarballs. I made a start at this but got stuck
working out how to handle the pthread-related changes...
tgz attached (not a diff due to the changed directory layouts)
if anyone is interested in taking a look/hel
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 10:32:27PM -0400, Nick Bender wrote:
>> So how cool would it be to add tcl to base? Seriously, bsd liscense,
>> small footprint, knock off lots off depencies for ports
>>
>> Ok, crawlng back into my hole
>
> Not su
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 10:32:27PM -0400, Nick Bender wrote:
> So how cool would it be to add tcl to base? Seriously, bsd liscense,
> small footprint, knock off lots off depencies for ports
>
> Ok, crawlng back into my hole
Not sure tcl is that secure...
So how cool would it be to add tcl to base? Seriously, bsd liscense,
small footprint, knock off lots off depencies for ports
Ok, crawlng back into my hole
On 2009/10/06 12:14, David Coppa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2009/10/06 11:18, David Coppa wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stuart Henderson
> >> wrote:
> >> > been in a bulk build - ok?
> >>
> >> Is tcl now a build dependency even with th
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/10/06 11:18, David Coppa wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> > been in a bulk build - ok?
>>
>> Is tcl now a build dependency even with the "no_tcl" flavor?
>
> Ah, yes it is, unless we ship the g
On 2009/10/06 11:18, David Coppa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > been in a bulk build - ok?
>
> Is tcl now a build dependency even with the "no_tcl" flavor?
Ah, yes it is, unless we ship the generated files.
"SQLite does not require TCL to run, but a TCL in
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> been in a bulk build - ok?
Is tcl now a build dependency even with the "no_tcl" flavor?
# env FLAVOR=no_tcl make
===> sqlite3-3.6.18 depends on: libtool-* - found
===> Verifying specs: c ncurses pthread readline c
===> found c.51.1
On 2009/10/05 15:11, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 10:24:22AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > been in a bulk build - ok?
> >
> > Index: Makefile
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/sqlite3/Makefile,v
> > retrie
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 10:24:22AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> been in a bulk build - ok?
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/sqlite3/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.47
> diff -u -p -r1.47 Makefile
> ---
19 matches
Mail list logo
