On 2009/10/05 15:11, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 10:24:22AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > been in a bulk build - ok?
> >
> > Index: Makefile
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/sqlite3/Makefile,v
> > retrieving revision 1.47
> > diff -u -p -r1.47 Makefile
> > --- Makefile 3 Aug 2009 09:55:47 -0000 1.47
> > +++ Makefile 5 Oct 2009 09:16:29 -0000
> > @@ -3,14 +3,14 @@
> > COMMENT-main= embedded SQL implementation
> > COMMENT-tcl= TCL bindings for Sqlite3
> > COMMENT-lemon= LEMON LALR(1) parser generator
> > -V= 3.6.16
> > +V= 3.6.18
> > DISTNAME= sqlite-${V}
> > PKGNAME-main= sqlite3-${V}
> > PKGNAME-tcl= sqlite3-tcl-${V}
> > PKGNAME-lemon= lemon-${V}
> > CATEGORIES= databases
> > -SHARED_LIBS += sqlite3 13.3 # .8.6
> > -SHARED_LIBS += tclsqlite3 12.3 # .8.6
> > +SHARED_LIBS += sqlite3 13.4 # .8.6
> > +SHARED_LIBS += tclsqlite3 12.4 # .8.6
> >
> > MASTER_SITES= ${HOMEPAGE}
> >
> Whenever libs get bumped like that, I'd like a justification.
> Any new functions that explain the minor bump ?
> Sure you don't need a major bump ?
> Sure you need the minor bump ?
>
Ah you're right, there are added functions, but I also missed
some which were removed. So yes, it needs a major bump.
On the other hand tclsqlite3 doesn't need the bump (actually
it looks like it doesn't want to be there at all, it's installed
to libtclsqlite3.so and the version information doesn't seem to
be used?)
