Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-11-16 Thread Brad Smith
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 01:16:26AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 03:15:09PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 6.1.1. > > > > > > Most of the tree is in good shape, but a few ports still ne

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-11-16 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Wed Sep 25, 2024 at 08:16:14AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > > > > telephony/linphone/mediastreamer2 > Here is a patch from mediastreamer2 diff --git a/telephony/linphone/mediastreamer2/Makefile b/telephony/linphone/mediastreamer2/Makefile index eb3147f0d65..a9fade0ab8f 100644 --- a/

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-11-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/11/14 13:51, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Thu Nov 14, 2024 at 12:18:03PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > I also see this in my last ffmpeg6 bulk build: > > > > > > 307071 Error: > > > /tmp/pobj/vlc-3.0.20/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/vlc/plugins/codec/libvaapi_drm_plugin.so > > > does not

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-11-14 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Thu Nov 14, 2024 at 12:18:03PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > I also see this in my last ffmpeg6 bulk build: > > > > 307071 Error: > > /tmp/pobj/vlc-3.0.20/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/vlc/plugins/codec/libvaapi_drm_plugin.so > > does not exist > > 307072 Error: > > /tmp/pobj/vlc-3.0.20/fake-

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-11-14 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Thu Nov 14, 2024 at 09:46:18AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Tue Sep 24, 2024 at 12:28:35PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 07:55:38AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > Could some throw this into a bulk build please? > > > > > > The entire Qt5/Qt6 ecosystem depends

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-11-14 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Tue Sep 24, 2024 at 12:28:35PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 07:55:38AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Could some throw this into a bulk build please? > > > > The entire Qt5/Qt6 ecosystem depends on FFmpeg API >= 5. > > This doesn't look too bad. The qtwebengines depe

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-11-09 Thread Klemens Nanni
25.09.2024 08:16, Brad Smith пишет: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 03:15:09PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: >>> Here is an update to FFmpeg 6.1.1. >>> >>> Most of the tree is in good shape, but a few ports still need some >>> work. >>> >>> Please

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-09-25 Thread Theo Buehler
> > x11/vlc > Have never seen that here. Happened twice now.

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-09-25 Thread Brad Smith
On 2024-09-25 2:16 a.m., Rafael Sadowski wrote: On Wed Sep 25, 2024 at 01:31:12AM GMT, Brad Smith wrote: On 2024-09-24 6:28 a.m., Theo Buehler wrote: On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 07:55:38AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: Could some throw this into a bulk build please? The entire Qt5/Qt6 ecosystem d

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-09-24 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Wed Sep 25, 2024 at 01:31:12AM GMT, Brad Smith wrote: > On 2024-09-24 6:28 a.m., Theo Buehler wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 07:55:38AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > Could some throw this into a bulk build please? > > > > > > The entire Qt5/Qt6 ecosystem depends on FFmpeg API >= 5. >

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-09-24 Thread Brad Smith
On 2024-09-24 6:28 a.m., Theo Buehler wrote: On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 07:55:38AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: Could some throw this into a bulk build please? The entire Qt5/Qt6 ecosystem depends on FFmpeg API >= 5. This doesn't look too bad. The qtwebengines depend on an extra symbol that woul

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-09-24 Thread Brad Smith
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 03:15:09PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 6.1.1. > > > > Most of the tree is in good shape, but a few ports still need some > > work. > > > > Please test if you have I guess one of thos

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-09-24 Thread Theo Buehler
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 07:55:38AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Could some throw this into a bulk build please? > > The entire Qt5/Qt6 ecosystem depends on FFmpeg API >= 5. This doesn't look too bad. The qtwebengines depend on an extra symbol that would need to be patched into system ffmpeg si

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-09-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
That would probably be better done after release builds are running. On 2024/09/22 07:55, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Could some throw this into a bulk build please? > > The entire Qt5/Qt6 ecosystem depends on FFmpeg API >= 5. > > Thanks! > > On Sat Aug 03, 2024 at 03:15:08PM GMT, Brad Smith wrote

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-09-21 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Could some throw this into a bulk build please? The entire Qt5/Qt6 ecosystem depends on FFmpeg API >= 5. Thanks! On Sat Aug 03, 2024 at 03:15:08PM GMT, Brad Smith wrote: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 6.1.1. > > > > Most of the tree

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-08-20 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Wed Aug 14, 2024 at 07:54:20AM GMT, Jan Stary wrote: > These belong to the new ffmpeg-6.1.2.v1 > but there is also e.g. /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.25.0 > which belongs to no package: > > $ pkg_info -E /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.25.0 > $ pkg_info -E /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.26.0 > /us

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-08-13 Thread Jan Stary
On Aug 13 21:27:22, s...@spacehopper.org wrote: > On 2024/08/13 16:07, Jan Stary wrote: > > On Aug 03 15:15:08, b...@comstyle.com wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 6.1.1. > > > > > > > > Most of the tree is in good shape, b

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-08-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/08/13 16:07, Jan Stary wrote: > On Aug 03 15:15:08, b...@comstyle.com wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 6.1.1. > > > > > > Most of the tree is in good shape, but a few ports still need some > > > work. > > > > > > Plea

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-08-13 Thread Jan Stary
On Aug 03 15:15:08, b...@comstyle.com wrote: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 6.1.1. > > > > Most of the tree is in good shape, but a few ports still need some > > work. > > > > Please test if you have I guess one of those Apple arm64 s

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-08-04 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sat Aug 03, 2024 at 03:15:08PM GMT, Brad Smith wrote: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 6.1.1. > > > > Most of the tree is in good shape, but a few ports still need some > > work. > > > > Please test if you have I guess one of those A

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 6.1.1

2024-08-03 Thread Brad Smith
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 6.1.1. > > Most of the tree is in good shape, but a few ports still need some > work. > > Please test if you have I guess one of those Apple arm64 systems > or modern Intel amd64. 6.1.2 has been released.

Re: iaxclient [was Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5]

2024-08-01 Thread Brad Smith
On 2024-08-01 8:39 a.m., Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2024/08/01 05:07, Brad Smith wrote: Last time I ran through building various ports and checking my list consisted of.. audio/potamus graphics/openscenegraph telephony/iaxclient telephony/linphone/mediastreamer2 I would have to run a full bulk a

iaxclient [was Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5]

2024-08-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/08/01 05:07, Brad Smith wrote: > Last time I ran through building various ports and checking > my list consisted of.. audio/potamus graphics/openscenegraph > telephony/iaxclient telephony/linphone/mediastreamer2 I would have to > run a full bulk again to see if there is anything else. Can

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-08-01 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Thu Aug 01, 2024 at 11:02:41AM UTC, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2024/08/01 10:42, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > On Tue Jul 30, 2024 at 09:59:37PM UTC, Brad Smith wrote: > > > On 2024-07-30 1:54 a.m., Mihai Popescu wrote: > > > > I see ffmpeg is on version 7 as a release. If I may ask, why ports ar

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-08-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/08/01 10:42, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Tue Jul 30, 2024 at 09:59:37PM UTC, Brad Smith wrote: > > On 2024-07-30 1:54 a.m., Mihai Popescu wrote: > > > I see ffmpeg is on version 7 as a release. If I may ask, why ports are > > > not jumping higher than 4.4.5 with ffmpeg version? > > > Is it

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-08-01 Thread Brad Smith
On 2024-07-31 12:05 a.m., José Maldonado wrote: El mar, 30 jul 2024 a la(s) 10:03 p.m., Brad Smith (b...@comstyle.com) escribió: On 2024-07-30 1:54 a.m., Mihai Popescu wrote: I see ffmpeg is on version 7 as a release. If I may ask, why ports are not jumping higher than 4.4.5 with ffmpeg version

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-08-01 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Mon Jul 29, 2024 at 03:57:36AM UTC, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.4.5. Works in my setup. OK rsadowski > > > Index: graphics/ffmpeg/Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/graphics/ffmpeg/Makefile,v > retrievin

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-08-01 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Tue Jul 30, 2024 at 09:59:37PM UTC, Brad Smith wrote: > On 2024-07-30 1:54 a.m., Mihai Popescu wrote: > > I see ffmpeg is on version 7 as a release. If I may ask, why ports are > > not jumping higher than 4.4.5 with ffmpeg version? > > Is it because it won't compile on OpenBSD? > > Is it because

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-07-31 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/07/31 12:02, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:05:36AM GMT, José Maldonado wrote: > > Hi Brad! Two questions you might be able to answer: > > > > What downstream projects haven't switched to at least ffmpeg 6 yet? > > > > What OpenBSD projects do we have that depend

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-07-31 Thread Lucas Gabriel Vuotto
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:05:36AM GMT, José Maldonado wrote: > Hi Brad! Two questions you might be able to answer: > > What downstream projects haven't switched to at least ffmpeg 6 yet? > > What OpenBSD projects do we have that depend on ffmpeg? # pkg_add sqlports $ show-reverse-deps graphics/

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-07-30 Thread José Maldonado
El mar, 30 jul 2024 a la(s) 10:03 p.m., Brad Smith (b...@comstyle.com) escribió: > > On 2024-07-30 1:54 a.m., Mihai Popescu wrote: > > I see ffmpeg is on version 7 as a release. If I may ask, why ports are > not jumping higher than 4.4.5 with ffmpeg version? > Is it because it won't compile on Open

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-07-30 Thread Brad Smith
On 2024-07-30 1:54 a.m., Mihai Popescu wrote: I see ffmpeg is on version 7 as a release. If I may ask, why ports are not jumping higher than 4.4.5 with ffmpeg version? Is it because it won't compile on OpenBSD? Is it because some dependencies will not support a higher version of ffmpeg yet? Unt

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-07-30 Thread Brad Smith
On 7/29/2024 7:49 PM, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:57:36AM GMT, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.4.5. Works for me via mpv. VA-API still works. I guess the default is to do detection at configure-time and that's why it keeps working despite the removal o

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-07-30 Thread José Maldonado
El mar, 30 jul 2024 a la(s) 4:42 a.m., Stuart Henderson (s...@spacehopper.org) escribió: > > I haven't checked and Brad will know more but from past major updates to > FFmpeg I'd expect dependencies are a big part of it. You may have seen some > commits over the months about adding/backporting su

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-07-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
I haven't checked and Brad will know more but from past major updates to FFmpeg I'd expect dependencies are a big part of it. You may have seen some commits over the months about adding/backporting support to various ports for newer versions. As there are a lot of ports depending on it, and ofte

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-07-29 Thread Mihai Popescu
I see ffmpeg is on version 7 as a release. If I may ask, why ports are not jumping higher than 4.4.5 with ffmpeg version? Is it because it won't compile on OpenBSD? Is it because some dependencies will not support a higher version of ffmpeg yet? Thanks.

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-07-29 Thread Lucas Gabriel Vuotto
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:57:36AM GMT, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.4.5. Works for me via mpv. VA-API still works. I guess the default is to do detection at configure-time and that's why it keeps working despite the removal of the explicit `--enable-vaapi`? Lucas

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-07-29 Thread Jan Stary
On Jul 29 12:14:59, h...@stare.cz wrote: > On Jul 29 03:57:36, b...@comstyle.com wrote: > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.4.5. > > Thanks. It works fine here on current/amd64. > > How can I tell that it is using the new VAAPI? > I think it does, as playing e.g. a H264 file > makes ffplay eat abou

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.5

2024-07-29 Thread Jan Stary
On Jul 29 03:57:36, b...@comstyle.com wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.4.5. Thanks. It works fine here on current/amd64. How can I tell that it is using the new VAAPI? I think it does, as playing e.g. a H264 file makes ffplay eat about 10% on this otherwise idle machine, while mplayer on th

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.3

2022-12-03 Thread Brad Smith
ping. On 11/4/2022 11:49 PM, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.4.3. version 4.4.3: - avformat/vividas: Check packet size - configure: link to libatomic when it's present - avcodec/dstdec: Check for overflow in build_filter() - avformat/spdifdec: Use 64bit to compute bit rate - av

Re: update: ffmpeg-normalize: 1.20.0 -> 1.23.0 (+ new dep)

2022-06-23 Thread Omar Polo
imported and updated, thanks! :) Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022/06/09 11:09, Yifei Zhan wrote: > > This is an update for ffmpeg-normalize, it requires a new dep > > multimedia/py3-ffmpeg-progress-yield, which is attached. > > OK for multimedia/py3-ffmpeg-progress-yield import > > OK for upd

Re: update: ffmpeg-normalize: 1.20.0 -> 1.23.0 (+ new dep)

2022-06-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/06/09 11:09, Yifei Zhan wrote: > This is an update for ffmpeg-normalize, it requires a new dep > multimedia/py3-ffmpeg-progress-yield, which is attached. OK for multimedia/py3-ffmpeg-progress-yield import OK for update > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 01:02:08PM +, Yifei Zhan wrote: > >

Re: update: ffmpeg-normalize: 1.20.0 -> 1.23.0 (+ new dep)

2022-06-23 Thread Laurence Tratt
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 01:02:08PM +, Yifei Zhan wrote: Hello Yifei, >> This is an update for ffmpeg-normalize, it requires a new dep >> multimedia/py3-ffmpeg-progress-yield, which is attached. This looks good to me -- I'd like to see it go in! Laurie

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.1

2021-11-07 Thread Josh Grosse
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 10:30:35PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 09:35:11PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.4.1. > > And with the missing MPlayer piece. Tested ffplay / ffmpeg and mplayer on amd64. Working for me.

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.1

2021-10-25 Thread Jordan Geoghegan
On 10/24/21 11:48 PM, Zé Loff wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 09:35:11PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: >> Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.4.1. > Hi Brad > > Did you get a chance to look at the patch I sent some days ago fixing > multicasts (attached again)? > > Thanks > It sure would be nice to get m

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4.1

2021-10-25 Thread Zé Loff
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 09:35:11PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.4.1. Hi Brad Did you get a chance to look at the patch I sent some days ago fixing multicasts (attached again)? Thanks > > Index: Makefile > =

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.4

2021-04-27 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sat Apr 10, 2021 at 07:13:20PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.4. > Build and runs fine on amd64, concerns? > > Index: graphics/ffmpeg/Makefile > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/graphics/ffmpeg/Makefile,

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.1.1

2019-02-22 Thread Bryan Linton
On 2019-02-21 17:47:07, Brad Smith wrote: > I have patched as far as I know the whole ports tree for API issues > that were found with newer FFmpeg. So I am now able to send out a > proper update to FFmpeg. > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.1.1 and coupled ports updates. > > Any and all testing

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.1.1

2019-02-22 Thread Nam Nguyen
Brad Smith writes: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.1.1 and coupled ports updates. > > Any and all testing welcome. > > FFmpeg > https://comstyle.com/ffmpeg/ffmpeg.diff I successfully streamed dhewm3 from my OpenBSD gaming computer to my OpenBSD streaming computer to twitch.tv. Both used ffmpeg 4

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.1.1

2019-02-21 Thread Brad Smith
On 2/21/2019 5:47 PM, Brad Smith wrote: I have patched as far as I know the whole ports tree for API issues that were found with newer FFmpeg. So I am now able to send out a proper update to FFmpeg. Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.1.1 and coupled ports updates. Any and all testing welcome. FFmp

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 4.1.1

2019-02-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/02/21 17:47, Brad Smith wrote: > I have patched as far as I know the whole ports tree for API issues > that were found with newer FFmpeg. So I am now able to send out a > proper update to FFmpeg. > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 4.1.1 and coupled ports updates. > > Any and all testing welc

Re: update ffmpeg to 4.1

2018-11-19 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:01:51AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Sun Nov 18, 2018 at 12:24:13AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 10:35:59PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > Build failures in these: > > > > > > graphics/opencv > > Can probably be removed as already n

Re: update ffmpeg to 4.1

2018-11-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/11/19 08:01, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Sun Nov 18, 2018 at 12:24:13AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 10:35:59PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > Build failures in these: > > > > > > graphics/opencv > > Can probably be removed as already noted by juanfra. > >

Re: update ffmpeg to 4.1

2018-11-18 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sun Nov 18, 2018 at 12:24:13AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 10:35:59PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Build failures in these: > > > > graphics/opencv > Can probably be removed as already noted by juanfra. > opencv can't removed. graphics/digikam-kde4 depends on i

Re: update ffmpeg to 4.1

2018-11-17 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 10:35:59PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Build failures in these: > > audio/aqualung > audio/chromaprint > audio/moc I'll look into it. > audio/pianobar > audio/squeezelite > databases/strigi > emulators/mgba > games/alephone/alephone > games/renpy > games/stepmania > g

Re: update ffmpeg to 4.1

2018-11-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
Build failures in these: audio/aqualung audio/chromaprint audio/moc audio/pianobar audio/squeezelite databases/strigi emulators/mgba games/alephone/alephone games/renpy games/stepmania graphics/amide graphics/gegl graphics/opencv graphics/openscenegraph multimedia/dvdstyler multimedia/ffmpeg2theor

Re: update ffmpeg to 4.1

2018-11-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/11/15 22:51, Klemens Nanni wrote: > Proper diff incl. patch-configure changes, thanks rsadowski. FWIW this builds OK on i386. One failure in "make test" (see below), no idea how important that is. It's not a good machine for real-world runtime tests. Watch out for programs which have SDL

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20150107

2015-01-08 Thread Josh Grosse
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:46:25PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 20150107. Another snapshot > along the 2.4 branch to roll in any bug fixes commited > between the last snap and now. > > OK? Working on i386.

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20141010

2014-10-18 Thread Jonathan Armani
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:19:43AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 20141010. This is the 2.4.2 release. > > A variety of bug fixes rolled into the 2.4.2 release. > > OK? > > Hi, Out of curiosity, why did you switch (only) amd64 to clang ? ffmpeg require the ioctl I jus

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140916

2014-09-18 Thread Chuck Burns
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 1:43:15 PM Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2014/09/17 06:38, Chuck Burns wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 09:05:26 PM Brad Smith wrote: > > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 20140916. This is the 2.4 release. > > > > > > Tested on amd64, i386 and sparc64. > > >

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140916

2014-09-17 Thread Josh Grosse
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:05:26PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 20140916. This is the 2.4 release. > > Tested on amd64, i386 and sparc64. > > OK? Works for me on i386, as does the updated mplayer.

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140916

2014-09-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/09/17 06:38, Chuck Burns wrote: > On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 09:05:26 PM Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 20140916. This is the 2.4 release. > > > > Tested on amd64, i386 and sparc64. > > > > OK? > > > > > > I could be wrong, but I think the maintainer of ffmpeg ha

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140916

2014-09-17 Thread Chuck Burns
On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 09:05:26 PM Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 20140916. This is the 2.4 release. > > Tested on amd64, i386 and sparc64. > > OK? > > I could be wrong, but I think the maintainer of ffmpeg has plans for this, but 2.4 isn't ABI-compatible with previou

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140912

2014-09-15 Thread Brad Smith
On 12/09/14 12:07 PM, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to a newer FFmpeg snapshot from 20140912. Mainly to fix bugs with HEVC and VP9 decoding (among the other bug fixes coming in). OK? I'm going to hold off on this as is as I wasn't aware that 2.4 was going to be branched 3 days after this

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140912

2014-09-15 Thread Brad Smith
On 14/09/14 11:56 AM, Josh Grosse wrote: On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:07:22PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to a newer FFmpeg snapshot from 20140912. Mainly to fix bugs with HEVC and VP9 decoding (among the other bug fixes coming in). I cannot build on i386: Yes, thanks. I noticed

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140912

2014-09-14 Thread Josh Grosse
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:56:25AM -0400, I wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:07:22PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is an update to a newer FFmpeg snapshot from 20140912. Mainly > > to fix bugs with HEVC and VP9 decoding (among the other bug fixes > > coming in). > > I cannot build on i386:

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140912

2014-09-14 Thread Josh Grosse
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:07:22PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to a newer FFmpeg snapshot from 20140912. Mainly > to fix bugs with HEVC and VP9 decoding (among the other bug fixes > coming in). I cannot build on i386: In file included from libpostproc/postprocess.c:560: libpostpr

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140912

2014-09-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/09/14 08:02, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 09:49:11AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > On 12/09/14 1:14 PM, Landry Breuil wrote: > > >On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:07:22PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > >>Here is an update to a newer FFmpeg snapshot from 20140912. Mainly > > >>to fi

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140912

2014-09-13 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 09:49:11AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > On 12/09/14 1:14 PM, Landry Breuil wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:07:22PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > >>Here is an update to a newer FFmpeg snapshot from 20140912. Mainly > >>to fix bugs with HEVC and VP9 decoding (among the other b

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140912

2014-09-13 Thread patrick keshishian
On 9/12/14, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to a newer FFmpeg snapshot from 20140912. Mainly > to fix bugs with HEVC and VP9 decoding (among the other bug fixes > coming in). Not sure if you care. Seems OK on amd64, playing some mp4s and converting some m4a to mp3s. --patrick $ sysctl ker

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140912

2014-09-13 Thread Brad Smith
On 12/09/14 1:14 PM, Landry Breuil wrote: On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:07:22PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to a newer FFmpeg snapshot from 20140912. Mainly to fix bugs with HEVC and VP9 decoding (among the other bug fixes coming in). Here's what we have on the mirrors now for ffmp

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20140912

2014-09-12 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:07:22PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to a newer FFmpeg snapshot from 20140912. Mainly > to fix bugs with HEVC and VP9 decoding (among the other bug fixes > coming in). Here's what we have on the mirrors now for ffmpeg: Mar 29 13:53 mips64/ffmpeg-20131216

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 2.3

2014-07-17 Thread Brad Smith
On 17/07/14 4:48 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014/07/17 03:01, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to FFmpeg 2.3. I haven't been tracking FFmpeg development, does this update include the fix for the LZO integer overflow? Yes, it does. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dan

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 2.3

2014-07-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/07/17 03:01, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 2.3. I haven't been tracking FFmpeg development, does this update include the fix for the LZO integer overflow?

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 2.2 branch / newer MPlayer

2014-05-13 Thread Brad Smith
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:56:36AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update of FFmpeg to the 2.2 branch and an update to newer MPlayer. > > Already run through a bulk and everything in the tree has been fixed > to use the newer API. > > OK? An updated diff adding a fix for a regression with

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 2.2 branch / newer MPlayer

2014-05-12 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/05/05 07:56, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update of FFmpeg to the 2.2 branch and an update to newer MPlayer. > > Already run through a bulk and everything in the tree has been fixed > to use the newer API. > > OK? As far as the ports tree goes I think we're in shape for this, Brad has

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20131216

2013-12-26 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:46:26AM -0500, Brad Smith said that > Here is an update to FFmpeg 20131216, taken from the 1.2 branch. Its just a > bug fix update. > > http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release/1.2 please forgive me for the ignorant question, but why is

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20130612

2013-06-16 Thread Donovan Watteau
Brad Smith wrote: > Here is a newer snapshot of FFmpeg along the 1.2 branch; bringing in > a bunch of bug fixes. > > [...] Everything's OK for me on loongson, as usual.

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20130319 snapshot (1.2)

2013-03-31 Thread Donovan Watteau
Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to an FFmpeg snapshot from 0319 which is from the new FFmpeg 1.2 release/branch. Looking for any testing. Tried some ffmpeg conversions and some mplayer playing on loongson; all good for me. The new libavcodec/mips stuff built fine.

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg / MPlayer 20130214

2013-03-08 Thread frantisek holop
hi there this update works very nicely, as discussed here before, also with pp filters. please commit. -f -- it is better to be hated than to be ignored.

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg / MPlayer 20130214

2013-03-03 Thread Jan Stary
On Mar 01 22:11:00, b...@comstyle.com wrote: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:27:05PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is an update to an FFmpeg 1.1 snapshot and the latest > > MPlayer. > > A proper diff for MPlayer. --disable-mp3lib wasn't supposed > to be in the Makefile and mp3lib has been remove

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg / MPlayer 20130214

2013-03-02 Thread Donovan Watteau
Brad Smith wrote: On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:27:05PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to an FFmpeg 1.1 snapshot and the latest > MPlayer. A proper diff for MPlayer. --disable-mp3lib wasn't supposed to be in the Makefile and mp3lib has been removed. All good for me on loongson.

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg / MPlayer 20130214

2013-03-01 Thread Brad Smith
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:27:05PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to an FFmpeg 1.1 snapshot and the latest > MPlayer. A proper diff for MPlayer. --disable-mp3lib wasn't supposed to be in the Makefile and mp3lib has been removed. Index: Makefile

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20111126

2011-12-14 Thread Jan Stary
On Dec 13 04:31:26, Brad wrote: > On 26/11/11 6:03 PM, Brad wrote: > >Here is an update to FFmpeg 2026 snapshot and updates for some > >of its dependencies. > > > >Tested on amd64. > > > >http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ > > Could someone who actually uses MPlayer please do some testing with

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20111126

2011-12-13 Thread Brad
On 26/11/11 6:03 PM, Brad wrote: Here is an update to FFmpeg 2026 snapshot and updates for some of its dependencies. Tested on amd64. http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ Could someone who actually uses MPlayer please do some testing with mencoder and get back to me? -- This message has bee

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20111126

2011-12-08 Thread Brad
On 04/12/11 8:46 AM, Edd Barrett wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:26:50PM -0500, Brad wrote: FFmpeg.. Yes. mencoder.. no. OK, well, we should try mencoder as some people might still need it. Yes and that's why I asked you to do some testing with MPlayer. What is the configure patch for mp

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20111126

2011-12-04 Thread Edd Barrett
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 07:26:50PM -0500, Brad wrote: > FFmpeg.. Yes. mencoder.. no. OK, well, we should try mencoder as some people might still need it. > > >What is the configure patch for mplayer about? How does this relate to > >the ffmpeg update? > > So that MPlayer builds with FFmpeg. Ge

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20111126

2011-12-01 Thread Brad
On 01/12/11 1:18 PM, Edd Barrett wrote: On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 06:03:18PM -0500, Brad wrote: Here is an update to FFmpeg 2026 snapshot and updates for some of its dependencies. I have tested ffmpeg and mplayer on i386. From a functional POV (from mplayer), seems to work. Have you tried en

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20111126

2011-12-01 Thread Brett
> > Why has sdl output been disabled? SDL is still in WANTLIB. > I don't think SDL output has been disabled. From terminal: ... [VO_SDL] Using driver:X11. ... VO: [sdl] 322x240 => 1920x1080 Planer YV12 Please don't disable sdl, its the only driver that will play things properly on my laptop!

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20111126

2011-12-01 Thread Edd Barrett
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 06:03:18PM -0500, Brad wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 2026 snapshot and updates for some > of its dependencies. I have tested ffmpeg and mplayer on i386. From a functional POV (from mplayer), seems to work. Have you tried encoding stuff using ffmpeg/mencoder? Wha

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20111126

2011-11-30 Thread Brett
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:18:16 -0500 Brad wrote: > On 26/11/11 6:03 PM, Brad wrote: > > Here is an update to FFmpeg 2026 snapshot and updates for some > > of its dependencies. > > > > Tested on amd64. > > > > http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ > > If you use VLC, MPlayer, Xine-lib (Kaffeine / X

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20111126

2011-11-29 Thread Brad
On 26/11/11 6:03 PM, Brad wrote: Here is an update to FFmpeg 2026 snapshot and updates for some of its dependencies. Tested on amd64. http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ If you use VLC, MPlayer, Xine-lib (Kaffeine / Xine-ui) or anything using GStreamer please test this out. -- This message

Re: UPDATE: FFmpeg 20111126

2011-11-28 Thread Kirill Bychkov
On Sun, November 27, 2011 02:03, Brad wrote: > Here is an update to FFmpeg 2026 snapshot and updates for some > of its dependencies. > > Tested on amd64. > > http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > bel

Re: UPDATE: ffmpeg

2011-07-03 Thread Brad
On 03/07/11 2:32 PM, Jan Stary wrote: Again I agree: there's no *need*. But explicitly disabling it is exactly what the porting manual "highly recommends", right? Only if its set to yes or auto. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed

Re: UPDATE: ffmpeg

2011-07-03 Thread Jan Stary
On Jul 03 14:05:25, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2011, Jan Stary wrote: > > On Jul 03 13:06:21, Brad wrote: > >> On 03/07/11 5:05 AM, Jan Stary wrote: > >> >This diff is to make sure that ffmpeg doesn't create > >> >hidden dependencies when opencore-amr is installed. > >> > >> As I said in

Re: UPDATE: ffmpeg

2011-07-03 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011, Jan Stary wrote: > On Jul 03 13:06:21, Brad wrote: >> On 03/07/11 5:05 AM, Jan Stary wrote: >> >This diff is to make sure that ffmpeg doesn't create >> >hidden dependencies when opencore-amr is installed. >> >> As I said in my other post this is not necessary. > > It is not n

Re: UPDATE: ffmpeg

2011-07-03 Thread Jan Stary
On Jul 03 13:06:21, Brad wrote: > On 03/07/11 5:05 AM, Jan Stary wrote: > >This diff is to make sure that ffmpeg doesn't create > >hidden dependencies when opencore-amr is installed. > > As I said in my other post this is not necessary. It is not necessary, because --enable-libopencore-amrnb defa

Re: UPDATE: ffmpeg

2011-07-03 Thread Brad
On 03/07/11 5:05 AM, Jan Stary wrote: This diff is to make sure that ffmpeg doesn't create hidden dependencies when opencore-amr is installed. As I said in my other post this is not necessary. On Jul 01 19:08:47, Brad wrote: graphics/ffmpeg ffmpeg's configure recognizes --enable-l

Re: UPDATE: ffmpeg

2011-03-29 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:34:02PM -0400, Brad wrote: > On 29/03/11 6:14 PM, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 07:26:11PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > >>>On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 05:10:27PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > >>

Re: UPDATE: ffmpeg

2011-03-29 Thread Brad
On 29/03/11 6:14 PM, Pascal Stumpf wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 07:26:11PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 05:10:27PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 03:01:24PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote: Repl

  1   2   >