Re: PostgreSQL 9.0

2010-11-04 Thread Pierre-Emmanuel André
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:44:52PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 06:50:12PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 01:43:54PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: > > > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: > >

Re: PostgreSQL 9.0

2010-09-03 Thread Pierre-Emmanuel André
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 06:50:12PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 01:43:54PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: > > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I start a new thread for this future upgrade. > > > This

Re: PostgreSQL 9.0

2010-07-16 Thread Pierre-Emmanuel André
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 01:43:54PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I start a new thread for this future upgrade. > > This firt shot is for the beta1. > > One of the main feature for this release is Hot Sta

Re: PostgreSQL 9.0

2010-06-07 Thread Marc Espie
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:42:52PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 01:28:49PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2010/06/07 07:21, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > > What's the plan? Keeping an 8 around and a 9? > > > > > > I'd prefer that. > > > > that gets rather tricky with

Re: PostgreSQL 9.0

2010-06-07 Thread Landry Breuil
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 01:28:49PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010/06/07 07:21, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > What's the plan? Keeping an 8 around and a 9? > > > > I'd prefer that. > > that gets rather tricky with dependencies.. Yes, and moreover there's been no problem when we jumped fro

Re: PostgreSQL 9.0

2010-06-07 Thread Marco Peereboom
9 is a bit of a departure from their philosophy. It is much more big bang than I am comfortable with. What are the complications for having 2 versions? On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 01:28:49PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010/06/07 07:21, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > What's the plan? Keeping an

Re: PostgreSQL 9.0

2010-06-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/06/07 07:21, Marco Peereboom wrote: > What's the plan? Keeping an 8 around and a 9? > > I'd prefer that. that gets rather tricky with dependencies..

Re: PostgreSQL 9.0

2010-06-07 Thread Marco Peereboom
What's the plan? Keeping an 8 around and a 9? I'd prefer that. On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 01:43:54PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel Andr? wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel Andr? wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I start a new thread for this future upgrade. > > This firt shot is for

Re: PostgreSQL 9.0

2010-06-07 Thread Pierre-Emmanuel André
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: > Hi, > > I start a new thread for this future upgrade. > This firt shot is for the beta1. > One of the main feature for this release is Hot Standby > ( http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/hot-standby.html ) > Rele