On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:42:52PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 01:28:49PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2010/06/07 07:21, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > > What's the plan? Keeping an 8 around and a 9? > > > > > > I'd prefer that. > > > > that gets rather tricky with dependencies.. > > Yes, and moreover there's been no problem when we jumped from 7.x to > 8.x, the procedure is known & documented, and pea@ takes care of warning > users on current.html and po...@. So there's no reason to get headaches > from keeping both in-tree. Story is different for opendlap..
And we have @ask-update in pkg*, precisely because of postgresql.
