On 12/27/17 09:04, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2017/12/27 07:28, Landry Breuil wrote:
Maybe
USE_LIBTOOL=Yes is in order too ?
huh?
Hopefully last round. Now again without USE_LIBTOOL, but with the BDEPs
and TDEPs.
~Brian
li
On 2017/12/27 07:28, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Maybe
> USE_LIBTOOL=Yes is in order too ?
huh?
On 12/27/17 08:09, Theo Buehler wrote:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 07:28:55AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:18:24AM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi ports --
Attached is a new port, www/libmicrohttpd. libmicrohttpd is a tiny
embeddable httpd library written in C.
---
pkg/
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 07:28:55AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:18:24AM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
> > Hi ports --
> >
> > Attached is a new port, www/libmicrohttpd. libmicrohttpd is a tiny
> > embeddable httpd library written in C.
> >
> > ---
> > pkg/DESCR:
> > GNU
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:18:24AM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
> Hi ports --
>
> Attached is a new port, www/libmicrohttpd. libmicrohttpd is a tiny
> embeddable httpd library written in C.
>
> ---
> pkg/DESCR:
> GNU libmicrohttpd is a small C library that is supposed to make it easy
> to run an
Landry Breuil:
> I'm with nigel here, i'd rather have good test coverage with some BDEP's
> rather than no coverage at all, especially for an http library..
Ack, tweaked port attached.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
libmicrohttpd.tgz
Description: a
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 02:55:12PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Quote:
> | GNU libmicrohttpd offers a C library that provides a compact API
> | and implementation of an HTTP 1.1 web server (HTTP 1.0 is also
> | supported). GNU libmicrohttpd only implements the HTTP protocol.
> | The main a
On 04/05/15 13:55, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Quote: | GNU libmicrohttpd offers a C library that provides a
> compact API | and implementation of an HTTP 1.1 web server (HTTP
> 1.0 is also | supported). GNU libmicrohttpd only implements the
> HTTP protocol. | The main application must still pro
On 2011/03/29 00:56, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> This one
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/13133/focus=13153
>
> Says fixed in autoconf 2.68 to work with older pkg-config.
Ah perfect, we can just take the patch then.
> I looked at devel/metaauto, I can't get to pkg-confi
On 03/28/11 19:08, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/03/10 21:22, Nigel Taylor wrote:
>>> "translit(`+,-12345', `+--1-5', `<;>a-c-a')
>>>
>>> This fails to give the correct reasult on OpenBSD a-c-a expected to be
>>> equivalent to abcba, -a on the end is treated as -a." Back to back ranges
>>> not
On 2011/03/10 21:22, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> > "translit(`+,-12345', `+--1-5', `<;>a-c-a')
> >
> > This fails to give the correct reasult on OpenBSD a-c-a expected to be
> > equivalent to abcba, -a on the end is treated as -a." Back to back ranges
> > not
> > implemented yet.
> >
> > I think the i
Sorry for the lack of information from my part. I've duly noted your work.
I just need to spend a few hours looking really hard at the standards, the
code, checking what other compliant m4 say about translit, and then incorporate
your patch.
I did know it was a problem with translit(), but I had a
On 2011/03/08 21:31, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> Please can this new port, www/libmicrohttpd can added to the ports.
>
> httpd server library
>
> A required dependency of OpenVAS v3.1 component gsa (greenbone security
> assistant). security/openvas/gsa to follow soon as tested.
>
> Library version is
On 03/10/11 16:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> good find.
>
> after reading posix 2008 on this it isn't clear to me what is
> specified, but GNU m4 is clear in the documentation that _they_
> apply it non-recursively.
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/m4.html
> http://ww
On 03/10/11 20:38, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> On 03/10/11 16:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> good find.
>>
>> after reading posix 2008 on this it isn't clear to me what is
>> specified, but GNU m4 is clear in the documentation that _they_
>> apply it non-recursively.
>>
>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlin
On 03/10/11 16:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> good find.
>
> after reading posix 2008 on this it isn't clear to me what is
> specified, but GNU m4 is clear in the documentation that _they_
> apply it non-recursively.
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/m4.html
> http://ww
good find.
after reading posix 2008 on this it isn't clear to me what is
specified, but GNU m4 is clear in the documentation that _they_
apply it non-recursively.
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/m4.html
http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/manual/html_node/Translit.html
so im
On 03/08/11 22:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/03/08 21:31, Nigel Taylor wrote:
>> autoconf version should be left at 2.64, 2.65 has never worked for building
>> this, or any previous version, should now be 2.67 not available in ports.
>
> 2.65 requires m4(1) in base to adapt to some other G
On 2011/03/08 21:31, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> autoconf version should be left at 2.64, 2.65 has never worked for building
> this, or any previous version, should now be 2.67 not available in ports.
2.65 requires m4(1) in base to adapt to some other GNU m4 features -
there are a few small comments in
19 matches
Mail list logo
