Re: NEW: lua-lyaml

2016-04-23 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:33:04AM +0200, Florian Stinglmayr wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:54:04PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > Some time ago when needing to use yaml from lua I ended up with the same > > project as this port. > > > > Debian calls their lyaml package lua-yaml so it isn't w

Re: NEW: lua-lyaml

2016-04-23 Thread Florian Stinglmayr
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:54:04PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > Some time ago when needing to use yaml from lua I ended up with the same > project as this port. > > Debian calls their lyaml package lua-yaml so it isn't without precedent > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/lua-yaml > Btw, here is

Re: NEW: lua-lyaml

2016-04-22 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:14:17AM +0200, Florian Stinglmayr wrote: > > Thinking about it some more "lua-yaml" makes more sense than > > "lua-lyaml". > > > > There is another project called lua-yaml [1], and there's even another > just called "yaml" for Lua [2]. I thought it might be important to

Re: NEW: lua-lyaml

2016-04-22 Thread Florian Stinglmayr
> Thinking about it some more "lua-yaml" makes more sense than > "lua-lyaml". > There is another project called lua-yaml [1], and there's even another just called "yaml" for Lua [2]. I thought it might be important to clear up by name which one we have in the ports. But I am okay with all the oth

Re: NEW: lua-lyaml

2016-04-21 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:45:06PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 07:08:13PM +0200, Florian Stinglmayr wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:47:46PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > This could now drop the SHARED_ONLY part. > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > Why the need to reru

Re: NEW: lua-lyaml

2016-04-21 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 07:08:13PM +0200, Florian Stinglmayr wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:47:46PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > This could now drop the SHARED_ONLY part. > > > > Yes. > > > Why the need to rerun autoconf? Could configure be used as is? Currently > > the build fails here

Re: NEW: lua-lyaml

2016-04-21 Thread Florian Stinglmayr
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:47:46PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > This could now drop the SHARED_ONLY part. > Yes. > Why the need to rerun autoconf? Could configure be used as is? Currently > the build fails here with: > > ===> Configuring for lua-lyaml-6.0 > Using /usr/ports/pobj/lua-lyaml-6.0

Re: NEW: lua-lyaml

2016-04-21 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:03:36PM +0100, Florian Stinglmayr wrote: > Since I haven't received any suggestions for fixes or improvements I > assume it is ready to be imported, no? ;-) > > Regards, > Florian > This could now drop the SHARED_ONLY part. Why the need to rerun autoconf? Could confi

Re: NEW: lua-lyaml

2016-01-19 Thread Florian Stinglmayr
Since I haven't received any suggestions for fixes or improvements I assume it is ready to be imported, no? ;-) Regards, Florian

NEW: lua-lyaml

2016-01-15 Thread Florian Stinglmayr
Hello list, attached you will find a port for lua-lyaml. A new and modern binding for libyaml for Lua. It works with all Lua versions. As with most Lua libraries the shipped configure script do a terrible job of properly installing everything, so that has been made with some manual magic. The tes