This license text is the first paragraph of the ISC license
without the warranty disclaimer.
However I do *not* like patching to replace copyright / license text.
I would prefer "custom, see xyz file" until the author has time
to make a new release..
On 2012/07/03 17:24, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I
I am porting Mail::Sendmail and I ran into this situation a good while
back.
The CPAN page said and still says:
You can use this module freely. (Someone complained this is too vague.
So, more precisely: do whatever you want with it, but be warned that
terrible things will happen to you if you use
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:32:52PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >On Jun 12, 2011, at 13:14, Marc Espie wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:13:34AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> >>> I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licensed as:
> >>>
> >>> You can use this module freely.
>On Jun 12, 2011, at 13:14, Marc Espie wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:13:34AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
>>> I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licensed as:
>>>
>>> You can use this module freely. (Someone complained this is too vague.
>>> So, more precisely: do whatever
On 2011-06-12, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licensed as:
>
> You can use this module freely. (Someone complained this is too vague.
> So, more precisely: do whatever you want with it, but be warned that
> terrible things will happen to you if you use i
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:22 -0300, "Marcos Laufer"
wrote:
>
> Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 06:30:56PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> >
> >>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:13:34AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> >>>
> I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licens
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:54:55 -0500
Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> Except bad things.
Actually he says you can do bad things too, but have been warned not to.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Marcos Laufer wrote:
>
> Marc Espie wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 06:30:56PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
>>
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:13:34AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
>
> I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licensed a
Marc Espie wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 06:30:56PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:13:34AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licensed as:
You can use this module freely. (Someone complained this is too vague.
So, m
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 06:30:56PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:13:34AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> > > I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licensed as:
> > >
> > > You can use this module freely. (Someone complained this is too vague.
> > > So, more p
On 06/12/11 14:30, Miod Vallat wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:13:34AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licensed as:
You can use this module freely. (Someone complained this is too vague.
So, more precisely: do whatever you want with it, but be w
On Jun 12, 2011, at 13:14, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:13:34AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
>> I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licensed as:
>>
>> You can use this module freely. (Someone complained this is too vague.
>> So, more precisely: do whatever you
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:13:34AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> > I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licensed as:
> >
> > You can use this module freely. (Someone complained this is too vague.
> > So, more precisely: do whatever you want with it, but be warned that
> > terrible
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:13:34AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licensed as:
>
> You can use this module freely. (Someone complained this is too vague.
> So, more precisely: do whatever you want with it, but be warned that
> terrible things will
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 10:13:34 -0500
Chris Bennett wrote:
> How would that be dealt with in the license section in a port?
LICENSE=KARMA
I ran into a module on cpan that the author says is licensed as:
You can use this module freely. (Someone complained this is too vague.
So, more precisely: do whatever you want with it, but be warned that
terrible things will happen to you if you use it badly, like for
sending spam, or ...?)
How
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:50:50AM -0600, J Sisson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm creating a port for umurmur (BSD license), and I noted that it contains
> protobuf-c library code (apache 2.0 license).
>
> My question is how do I set the license information in the port's master
> Makefile? I currently hav
Hi,
I'm creating a port for umurmur (BSD license), and I noted that it contains
protobuf-c library code (apache 2.0 license).
My question is how do I set the license information in the port's master
Makefile? I currently have:
# BSD
PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM = Yes
PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP =Yes
PERMIT
Jakob Schlyter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> README-SenderID from the sid-milter says:
>
> "This source code may incorporate intellectual property owned by Microsoft
> Corporation that is necessary to implement the IETF Sender ID
> Specification.
I understand this to refer to a patent.
> the s
Jakob Schlyter wrote:
README-SenderID from the sid-milter says:
"This source code may incorporate intellectual property owned by
Microsoft Corporation that is necessary to implement the IETF Sender ID
Specification. A license for such intellectual property is available
from Microsoft under r
* Jakob Schlyter [2006-06-19]:
> what would be the correct settings for PERMIT_* ?
If in doubt, "No". You could check Debian, maybe they know better.
Nikolay
* Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> README-SenderID from the sid-milter says:
>
> "This source code may incorporate intellectual property owned by Microsoft
> Corporation that is necessary to implement the IETF Sender ID
> Specification. A license for such intellectual property is available from
> Micro
README-SenderID from the sid-milter says:
"This source code may incorporate intellectual property owned by Microsoft
Corporation that is necessary to implement the IETF Sender ID
Specification. A license for such intellectual property is available from
Microsoft under reasonable and non-discr
23 matches
Mail list logo
