Re: [update] editors/neovim 0.3.0

2018-06-29 Thread Edd Barrett
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 01:01:42AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Personally I'd just go for the simpler COMPER_LIBCXX, the "Extra" isn't a > real problem, but either way is ok with me. Alright, so here's an updated diff which syncs us with the work on tags, uses COMPILER_LIBCXX, and fixes some

Re: [update] editors/neovim 0.3.0

2018-06-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
Personally I'd just go for the simpler COMPER_LIBCXX, the "Extra" isn't a real problem, but either way is ok with me. -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 26 June 2018 20:09:18 Edd Barrett wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 01:28:38PM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: > c++abi is

Re: [update] editors/neovim 0.3.0

2018-06-26 Thread Edd Barrett
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:09:04PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > New diff inline. However, I'm seeing some Python-related test failures: I've just spoken to upstream. Those failures are an instance of: https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/8554 It's not a major issue and I don't think it should b

Re: [update] editors/neovim 0.3.0

2018-06-26 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi, On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 01:28:38PM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: > > c++abi is only on architectures with clang in base, so this will fail on > > other > > arches. > > Here's a new version that uses COMPILER_LIBCXX I don't think that's right. port-lib-depends-check gives: Extra: c++.1 Greppin

Re: [update] editors/neovim 0.3.0

2018-06-26 Thread Jon Bernard
* Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/06/22 15:32, Jon Bernard wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Here is an update to neovim. The patch we carried in our tree was > > merged upstream, so no longer needed. > > > > OK? > > > > -- > > Jon > > > Index: Makefile > >

Re: [update] editors/neovim 0.3.0

2018-06-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/06/22 15:32, Jon Bernard wrote: > Hello, > > Here is an update to neovim. The patch we carried in our tree was > merged upstream, so no longer needed. > > OK? > > -- > Jon > Index: Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/ed

Re: [update] editors/neovim 0.3.0

2018-06-22 Thread Edd Barrett
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 03:32:56PM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: > Here is an update to neovim. The patch we carried in our tree was > merged upstream, so no longer needed. This patch and the py-neovim patch is the result of a back and forth with Jon over the past couple of weeks or so. I've reviewe

[update] editors/neovim 0.3.0

2018-06-22 Thread Jon Bernard
Hello, Here is an update to neovim. The patch we carried in our tree was merged upstream, so no longer needed. OK? -- Jon Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/editors/neovim/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -p -r1.7