Prasad MN writes:
> Does not work for me either -- I am on the latest snapshot and
> Firefox fails with the same error as reported on the thread.
> Same error for Tor Browser.
It just takes patience. Or make. Surely you have a backup computer?
The problem was noticed and the patch pushed to CVS o
Omar Polo writes:
> removed the sentence "see the manual for more information on how
> xnotify works" which - I hope! - should sound obvious :)
If wishes were wings...
Matthew
Stuart Henderson writes:
> (CCs trimmed)
>
> On 2021/09/21 07:06, Peter Coleman wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> >
> >
> > We’re currently working on behalf of a major industry-leading client trying
> > to enhance their
> > brand via editorial content targeting the Swedish Market.
> >
> >
> >
>
Reuben ua Bríġ writes:
> > Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 15:28:49 +0200
> > From: Ingo Schwarze
>
> > I literally spent years of my life improving that.
>
> and im sure it is much better for it.
>
> ...
>
> good on em. why is it easier to get third party binaries than the
> openbsd source? the whole re
Antoine Jacoutot writes:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:57:23AM +, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> >
> >
>
> I don't quite understand your mail.
This:
> > > > What's the policy for adding debug packages to ports?
but ...
> See this:
> https://man.openbsd.org/bsd.port.mk.5#THE_DEBUG_PACKAGES_INFRAST
Antoine Jacoutot writes:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:31:11PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > What's the policy for adding debug packages to ports?
> >
> > Is the intend to add debug packages...
> > * eventually to all ports
> > or
> > * only to ports where they seem particularly useful?
>
Timo Myyrä writes:
>
> I think the modules are pretty well covered by StumpWM documentation (info
> page
> / wiki / contrib repo readme). It seems a bit redundant to repeat the same
> info
> in pkg readme file.
Apologies, I must have misunderstood. I was under the impression
it was due to an ope
I vaguely recall coming upon this problem some time back and not
getting anywhere with it. Might it be worth including this information
in the port's readme?
Matthew
> > Small issue as I was using stumptray in my config, stumpwm
> > complains about the lack of xembed even after I updated my
> > s
Giovanni Bechis writes:
> On 10/22/19 6:51 PM, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 08:54:42 +0200
> > Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/21/19 4:25 PM, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 16:02:09 +0200
> >>> Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> >>>
> Update
Perhaps rather than whining that OpenBSD lacks some specific feature, those who
want it could write it? A novel idea, I know, but it IS specifically a
development platform and there are precisely zero restrictions.
Or if you don't wish to start with code, at least try a tack such as "I intend
t
Theo de Raadt writes:
> >> > I recently posted a new CPAN module to ports@ which wraps pledge and
> >> > unveil. There was a bit of a balls up because as a sysadmin I'm not
> >> > really used to group development and what I've done has usually been in
> >> > a corporate environment but in the end a
Job Snijders writes:
> You should consider becoming part of the process, one of the most valuable
> currencies you can give to the project is a degree of continuity.
>
> To phrase it differently, =E2=80=9Cfire and forget=E2=80=9D is rarely a sus=
> tainable
> approach.
Well as suggested I'm not go
[including ports@]
Theo de Raadt writes:
> cho...@jtan.com wrote:
>
> > I recently posted a new CPAN module to ports@ which wraps pledge and
> > unveil. There was a bit of a balls up because as a sysadmin I'm not
> > really used to group development and what I've done has usually been in
> > a cor
... this time I've got my tar incantation correct.
Matthew
p5-Unix-Pledge-0.006.tgz
Description: p5-Unix-Pledge-0.006.tgz
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2019/05/01 19:42, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> > What would I put in WANTLIB? The only dependency this module has is
> > OpenBSD 6.4's base system (well strictly speaking, a libc with the
> > pledge and unveil calls).
>
> WANTLIB += c perl
I guess I got unlucky:
void:/us
Stuart Henderson writes:
> Please send tars not diffs for new ports.
Will do.
> Missing license marker and WANTLIB.
What would I put in WANTLIB? The only dependency this module has is
OpenBSD 6.4's base system (well strictly speaking, a libc with the
pledge and unveil calls).
I can't find examp
I've sat on this for a while because a) my email setup broke when I
upgraded my mail client, and b) while I was dealing with that I got a
message from the upstream author indicating that he's incorporating my
patch, which makes the diff included below an awful lot smaller.
On balance, saying that
Theo de Raadt writes:
> cho...@jtan.com wrote:
>
> > WTFPL 2 leaves upstream completely at liberty to license it under that
> > license if they choose. The point of the WTFPL is it's me saying "I've
> > written this and you can do what you like with it, up to and including
> > literally anything *i
joshua stein writes:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 20:59:38 +0300, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> > I've completed a port for Unix::Pledge, a perl module wrapping pledge(2)
> > (and now unveil(2)) and would like to know what to do with it.
> >
> > Unix::Pledge is the lightest-imaginable wrapper around the pl
I've completed a port for Unix::Pledge, a perl module wrapping pledge(2)
(and now unveil(2)) and would like to know what to do with it.
Unix::Pledge is the lightest-imaginable wrapper around the pledge system
call. The version which the upstream maintainer has released is 0.005,
which I've patched
20 matches
Mail list logo
