Re: Alpine mail client. Fresh install of 6.8. "Mail" works but Alpine problems

2021-01-23 Thread Austin Hook
Now to set up a new webserver too. And then maybe even do some crucial Year End company paperwork [Wish I had some time left for programming!] Stefan, again, thanks so much. Regards, Austin Hook Milk River, Canada On Sat, 23 Jan 2021, Stefan Hagen w

Re: psnup and psutils

2020-09-24 Thread Austin Hook
t that one package. Well, am off camping for 4 days. Will look at that whole question later. Cheers, Austin On Sun, 13 Sep 2020, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:21:41PM -0600, Austin Hook wrote: > > > > Using an amd64 running release version of 6.7 >

xsane under 6.7

2020-09-16 Thread Austin Hook
The docs kept saying make sure your device has the necessary permissions, without saying exactly in which sense that was meant. Finally, a few weeks ago I got most of my machines upgraded properly to 6.7, they were mostly 6.4 or earlier. Went to try my Canon flatbed scanner and xsane woul

psnup and psutils

2020-09-09 Thread Austin Hook
persize but I see neither the function that tries to get it, nor the specs for what has to be in /etc. Thanks and cheers! Austin Hook

Re: 6.6 pkg_add of firefox vs atk versions

2020-09-02 Thread Austin Hook
weed them, instead of messing with disk space. A. On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Austin Hook wrote: > > > slippery# pkg_info -mz >/root/pkg_list_manual > > > > > > Package database already locked... awaiting relea

Re: 6.6 pkg_add of firefox vs atk versions

2020-09-02 Thread Austin Hook
> > slippery# pkg_info -mz >/root/pkg_list_manual > > > > Package database already locked... awaiting release... ^C > > Are any other pkg_* or fw_update processes running at the same time? > It uses flock() on a file, I was under

Re: 6.6 pkg_add of firefox vs atk versions

2020-09-02 Thread Austin Hook
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote: > If you need to get it fixed, the following should do the trick; > save a list of packages, remove them all, and reinstall: > > pkg_info -mz >/root/pkg_list_manual > pkg_info -z >/root/pkg_list_full > pkg_delete -X /var/db/pkg/*-firmwa

Re: 6.6 pkg_add of firefox vs atk versions

2020-08-01 Thread Austin Hook
x27;ll let you know how I make out with the packages. Austin On Sun, 2 Aug 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020/08/01 17:38, Austin Hook wrote: > > > > Hi Stuart, > >Here's the full typescript attached. The list itself chops off > > attachments I think, bu

Re: 6.6 pkg_add of firefox vs atk versions

2020-08-01 Thread Austin Hook
Hi Vijay, Nice to hear from you too -- and it's been a while. I think your test - experience is quite useful, and your synopsis is encouraging. No need to send all the gory details. I was a bit afraid to mess around too much with the machine I do most of my work at home on. I had tried

Re: 6.6 pkg_add of firefox vs atk versions

2020-07-30 Thread Austin Hook
: > On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:32:53 -0600 (MDT) > Austin Hook : > > > Here's the output of pkg_check > > > > farm# pkg_check > > Packing-list sanity: ok > > Direct dependencies: ok > > --- gcj-4.9.4p12 --- > > dependency

Re: 6.6 pkg_add of firefox vs atk versions

2020-07-30 Thread Austin Hook
alculated? I am hoping that I am only a few clues away from getting the feel for the whole structure. Sometimes wonder what balance one should take between reading through miles of code and just begging for an island of insight. Thanks! Austin On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Stefan Hagen wrote: >

Re: 6.6 pkg_add of firefox vs atk versions

2020-07-29 Thread Austin Hook
terns are instructive to learning useful lessons, so that's why I think they are of some value. And maybe some value for others who scan the list for explanations. Regards, Austin Hook aus...@hook.org aus...@computershop.ca On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Solene Rapenne wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2

6.6 pkg_add of firefox vs atk versions

2020-07-29 Thread Austin Hook
nd if not, why not? Thanks in advance, for any comment. Austin Hook

Re: Broken ... Anki "current" branch?

2019-03-31 Thread Austin Hook
tically when I did pkg_add. But beside that, I wonder which LATEX packages would be appropriate to load for "installing latex and dvipng". If I knew that, I would explore deeper to see if I thought the current port was worth looking deeper into. So perhaps you or someone else would take a moment to encourage me. Austin Hook

wxMaxima Re: x11/wxWidgets 3.0.3.1 update

2018-03-31 Thread Austin Hook
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017/09/07 12:45, Jérôme KASPER wrote: > > Hi ports, > > > > attached an update to wxWidgets 3.0.3.1 . > > > > improvements : > > - Switch to github > > - unified package instead of -main, -media > > - dependancies upgraded to GTK+3 , SDL2 and gs

Re: Maxima can't start maxima -- works now!

2017-06-19 Thread Austin Hook
Using 6.0 on an AMD64 wxMaxima seems to run for me. I installed the ports directory, and commented out the "Broken" tag in the makefile. Did a make, and it ran for quite a while -- so many parts to it. Encountered one problem the first time: ran out of inodes... (WTF!) Couldn't imagine h

Re: chirp (chirpw) with Baofeng should be UV5R

2017-02-12 Thread Austin Hook
Re: chirp (chirpw) with Baofeng should be UV5R not UB5R

Re: UPDATE: comms/fldigi 3.21.83 => 3.22.04

2016-05-26 Thread Austin Hook
Hi Brian, Tim, Just got my Basic and Advanced ham license here, and am starting to try to figure out how to use fldigi. Don't see any more recent activity on the ports list, so wonder if testing it on 5.6 will be of any value at this point. Also wondering how many active OpenBSD f

Re: compat_linux / fedora_base

2009-05-19 Thread Austin Hook
[bcc: Vess] Hi Predrag, Thanks for the perspective and especially the tip about the Mathematica install, which should be quite interesting to look at. The number of different and often semi-specialized versions of Linux has certainly multiplied in the years since years ago when we had to u

Re: compat_linux / fedora_base

2009-05-19 Thread Austin Hook
s OpenBSD to explore them. Anyway, I'd still appreciate your insight, even if only presuming hypothetically, that compat-linux was worth the effort. It would also give me some broader vision of the how to approach issues. Regards, Austin On Tue, 19 May 2009, Nikolay Sturt wrote: &g

Ghostscript vs fontpath

2009-05-17 Thread Austin Hook
After installing the ghostscript package there is a note about re-arranging entries in "your font path". However, for people who have never been told where and how they acquired a personal "font path" is that just wording intended to tease them? Austin

Re: compat_linux / fedora_base

2009-05-17 Thread Austin Hook
[bcc: Vess] Hi Nikolay, OK, I have looked harder into this stuff. I now appreciate better why OpenBSD's own ldd works with Linux object files. Not having had much experience playing with libraries and linkable object formats since way back, much less dynamically loaded modules, I looked aroun

FW: Dyalog APL 12 for Linux (fwd)

2009-04-28 Thread Austin Hook
[bcc: Vess Irvine] Playing with the idea of getting a version of APL working on OpenBSD. Initally just looking to see if the Linux version can be made to work in compatibility mode. However, if yes, then we may work with the Dyalog to get a native port running. What is the easiest form of Linux

Re: OpenBSD 4.4 does not have a /usr/ports directory, is it broken?

2009-01-16 Thread Austin Hook
That's right. The ports directory is not there by default. But if you make one, or are there when you untar the ...gz file with all the ports in it, one will be created. Austin On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Support Team wrote: > Greetings, > > > > I have installed OBSD4.4 with all packages. The install

Re: Inclusion of software with subscription fee in the ports tree

2008-11-25 Thread Austin Hook
And yet the ports tree has long included stubs to install non-free software. Austin On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:22:54 + > Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2008/11/25 20:40, Alban Deniz wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I a

Packages link for 4.2 missing index page

2008-11-03 Thread Austin Hook
Hi Ports People, Any one know why the link for 4.2 packages on http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15#PkgFind goes to a directory without an index.html page? Compare to the link just above it to 4.3 packages. Austin