Re: GHC on OpenBSD/arm64?

2024-10-18 Thread Greg Steuck
Lydia Sobot writes: >>Perfect. How far in are you? > Not very, still figuring out how exactly the pieces fit in together FWIW, I made some effort in this area and it didn't go particularly smoothly. Some info in https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/24431

Upgrade to productivity/hledger-1.40

2024-10-18 Thread Greg Steuck
Works for my normal use. OK? --- productivity/hledger/Makefile | 116 +++ productivity/hledger/distinfo | 284 +- .../hledger/patches/patch-hledger_cabal | 43 --- 3 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 247 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 p

Upgrade to devel/cabal-install-3.12

2024-10-18 Thread Greg Steuck
Seems to be working well enough to build hledger (to follow). >From 03a0f0fecf71de606ef8088b4e2dba9dad53fc40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Steuck Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 21:52:22 -0700 --- devel/cabal-install/Makefile | 40 +- devel/cabal-install/distinfo | 132 ++---

games/naev: remove unnecessary patch

2024-10-18 Thread Thomas Frohwein
Hi, I was looking through the ports tree to find any `#include ` instead of stdlib.h for malloc (a mistake that I've made in the past) and found this being done in games/naev. A closer look showed it is behind `#if HAVE_MALLOC_H`, so this should actually never be reached in the first place. I tri

Re: bsd.port.mk: CHECKSUM_QUIET

2024-10-18 Thread Klemens Nanni
18.10.2024 02:00, Omar Polo пишет: > fwiw I'd also prefer to have this by default without knobs. The diff > looks fire to me, and I've tested that it behaves as advertised with a > go port. > > so... ok op@ if it's not already in :) Committed now, thanks.

Re: [NEW] devel/py-bitarray

2024-10-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
That's a diff not a committed thing -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 18 October 2024 00:33:23 SASANO Takayoshi wrote: Hi, Tests are broken, but Kirill Korinsky's MODPY_TEST_LINK_SO diff (which I need to look at again..) may help fix that. I don't think that's a block

Re: GHC on OpenBSD/arm64?

2024-10-18 Thread Lydia Sobot
>Is anyone working on porting GHC to OpenBSD/arm64? If so, when do you >think this'll land? > >If no one is doing this (or more hands would help), I wouldn't mind >getting stuck in. As a matter of fact, I'm trying to do it as we speak

Re: GHC on OpenBSD/arm64?

2024-10-18 Thread حبيب محمد الأمين محمد الهـاد
Perfect. How far in are you? I just checked, and it seems like they got rid of the C sources to bootstrap with, but they still have the C codegen backend. Now that AArch64 is going to be a bigger arch for many package managers/repos to build for, with Apple Silicon and all, even if it's just peopl

Re: GHC on OpenBSD/arm64?

2024-10-18 Thread Lydia Sobot
>Perfect. How far in are you? Not very, still figuring out how exactly the pieces fit in together

GHC on OpenBSD/arm64?

2024-10-18 Thread حبيب محمد الأمين محمد الهـاد
Hi, Is anyone working on porting GHC to OpenBSD/arm64? If so, when do you think this'll land? If no one is doing this (or more hands would help), I wouldn't mind getting stuck in. The major hurdle I see, not just for OpenBSD, but for a lot of Linux distros and other OSes it seems, is the lack of

Re: [net/tor] Please enable Onion PoW defense

2024-10-18 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:34:51 +0200, open...@systemfailure.net wrote: > > This defense mechanism has to be enabled at compile time, and is not > currently enabled on OpenBSD. The catch is that the code implementing this > PoW algorithm is under the LGPL-3.0 license; it is enabled by default... But

[net/tor] Please enable Onion PoW defense

2024-10-18 Thread openbsd
Hello, Denial-of-service attacks are a recurring problem on the Tor network, especially for Onion services. Over time, the Tor Project devs introduced several mitigations [1], the most recent one being Proof-of-Work (PoW) defense [2]. This defense mechanism has to be enabled at compile time, a

Re: [UPDATE] www/kiwix/libkiwix to 14.0.0

2024-10-18 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 09:42:18AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2024/10/17 22:07, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: > > Here is an update to libkiwix from 13.1.0 to 14.0.0. There are a fair > > number of changes listed: > > > > https://github.com/kiwix/libkiwix/releases/tag/14.0.0 > > > > Due to all

[BUG] x11/xfe Tar integration broken as of RELEASE_7_6

2024-10-18 Thread Rubén Llorente
Hi there, it looks like tar integration is broken in Xfe as of OpenBSD 7.6. In OpenBSD 7.5 the user could use a contextual menu to compress and decompress files and folders, which would cause Xfe to invoke tar. Now, when issued a compression command, Xfe tries to call tar with the "a" option,

Re: [UPDATE] www/kiwix/libkiwix to 14.0.0

2024-10-18 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/10/17 22:07, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: > Here is an update to libkiwix from 13.1.0 to 14.0.0. There are a fair > number of changes listed: > > https://github.com/kiwix/libkiwix/releases/tag/14.0.0 > > Due to all the changes, I bumped SHARED_LIBS to 1.1. All tests pass. Bumping only the min

Re: [update] devel/libmpc 1.1.0 -> 1.2.1

2024-10-18 Thread Theo Buehler
> A diff to update devel/libmpc is below. [..] > Anyone willing to ok this update? ok tb > Should this go through a bulk? Done on amd64. No fallout.