On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:19:50PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Since BTI affects any and all compilers that generate executable code,
> I tried to build all lang/* ports on amd64 with BTI enabled. Here's the
> list of failures:
>
> [...]
> lang/sbcl
the 2.3.6 update (already on ports@)
bulk build on arm64.ports.openbsd.org
started on Tue Jun 27 10:49:45 MDT 2023
finished at Thu Jun 29 20:34:44 MDT 2023
lasted 2D09h44m
done with kern.version=OpenBSD 7.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #2176: Tue Jun 27
03:12:23 MDT 2023
built packages:11674
Jun 27:3093
Jun 28:1043
Jun 29:7537
critical p
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 02:49:45PM -0700, Nam Nguyen wrote:
> Marc Espie writes:
>
> > I know you're not maintainer, but most of the relevant commits point back
> > to you:
> >
> > retroarch uses some ass-backwards build system making it prefer system
> > includes to its own includes, with ludicr
Hello,
Here's an update for osv-scanner which has been working fine.
Other tests?
Thanks,
Lucas
diff refs/heads/master refs/heads/osv
commit - 20cf8735fbeddad90caa5253fa7cc06119f78a1e
commit + 19c94d7e61976ab21392163b018b5081557a7220
blob - afe7fd52e81fcf10048eac96797eedb68742f382
blob + 8d96368
Hello,
On 2023/06/29 15:42:00 +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With latest changes on ecl, we are able to update sbcl to latest version
> (2.3.6).
>
> As maintainer systematically timeout since several years now, I am taking
> over
> the maintainership (and no reply on private mail as
Since BTI affects any and all compilers that generate executable code,
I tried to build all lang/* ports on amd64 with BTI enabled. Here's the
list of failures:
devel/jdk/1.8 # needs new bootstrap
lang/crystal
lang/fpc
lang/gcc/11
lang/ghc
lang/go # also fails on CPUs wi
* Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:30:10AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:25:20AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:54:10AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:23:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:26:58AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I note you didn't cc the port maintainer on your original mail,
> was there a reason for that?
Thank you, Stuart, missed that point.
> I've cc'd and included the original mail. What are you thoughts
> on this please Robert?
Than
Hi,
With latest changes on ecl, we are able to update sbcl to latest version
(2.3.6).
As maintainer systematically timeout since several years now, I am taking over
the maintainership (and no reply on private mail asking about continuing or not
to maintain lang/sbcl).
I have mostly rewritten
Hi,
Update to version 1.0.6 and use go modules so that we don't have to vendor
tarballs any more.
OK?
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
https://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/wormhole-william/Makefile,
Hi,
Attached diff updates geeqie to 2.1.
Changelog:
- Additional --selection remote commands
- Split view additional 3-image layout
- Many bug fixes
- Some progress in GTK4 migration
- Change source code from c to c++
- Much progress in making source code warning-free
- Updated language support
Te
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:30:10AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:25:20AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:54:10AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:23:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > Does the same happen if you
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:25:20AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:54:10AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:23:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Does the same happen if you build your own kernel rather than using a
> > > snap?
> >
> > Someon
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:54:10AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:23:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Does the same happen if you build your own kernel rather than using a
> > snap?
>
> Someone will have to port the patches that add _CET_ENDBR from
> security/boring
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:23:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Does the same happen if you build your own kernel rather than using a
> snap?
Someone will have to port the patches that add _CET_ENDBR from
security/boringssl/head to security/rust-ring.
* Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Does the same happen if you build your own kernel rather than using a
> snap?
No, it works when running a self-compiled kernel. So it seems it is
related to BTCFI.
Cheers
Matthias
(oops, resending, i screwed up the mail headers)
On 2023/06/29 00:49, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 03:25:42PM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 11:30:57PM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:14:34PM +, Sergey A.
Does the same happen if you build your own kernel rather than using a
snap?
On 2023/06/29 10:14, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hi ports@,
>
> ncspot on -current aborts on startup with SIGILL and complains about a
> missing assembler file in the ring crate. I haven't used it in a while
> so I did
Hi ports@,
ncspot on -current aborts on startup with SIGILL and complains about a
missing assembler file in the ring crate. I haven't used it in a while
so I didn't know exactly when it stopped working. My machine supports
BTCFI...
Let me know if you need more information.
Cheers
M
19 matches
Mail list logo
