hmm, on Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 07:32:19PM +0100, Marc Espie said that
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 06:59:02PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> > hmm, on Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:19:16PM +0100, Landry Breuil said that
> > > I've moved away all waf users from it (ie x11/gigolo & www/vteplugin)
> > > but i'd
On 1/1/2014 1:21 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Your current options are:
- move to amd64.
- move back to code from a month or two ago.
If anyone is able to help track down the timeframe this got broken
(or even pin it to a particular commit in base), that would be
extremely helpful...
I hav
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:19:57PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > I Haven't seen them in the bulk build i ran with the swig update diff..
> Hm, in fact i hadnt seen those failures because for some reason dpb
> didnt try building those pkgpaths for reasons unknown to me. Yay dpb.
Surprisingly eno
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:16:16PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > lang/nhc98: segfaults in build
>
> NOT_FOR_ARCHS= ${LP64_ARCHS} powerpc
> BROKEN-hppa=Segfault during build since the PIE switch
>
> Do we need this for bootstrapping or reference purposes
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:58:55PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 01:52:03PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > Not sure about cause yet, some may be PIE-related too:
> >
> > These are not:
> >
> > > lang/gcc/4.8: gcj: fatal error: ca
Failures in the latest amd64 bulk build:
textproc/redland-bindings swig: -php4 is no longer supported
mail/zarafa/zarafa 'SWIG_From_long' was not declared in this scope
x11/py-wxPython ld: cannot find -lwx_gtk2_media
Logs on request.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:52:51PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 09:38:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > devel/hasktags: unhandled ELF relocation(Rel) type 10, ghc: unable to load
> > package `integer-gmp'
> > devel/hs-ghc-paths: unhandled ELF relocation(Rel) type 1
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 06:59:02PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:19:16PM +0100, Landry Breuil said that
> > I've moved away all waf users from it (ie x11/gigolo & www/vteplugin)
> > but i'd rather remove waf from the tree instead of having someone losing
> > time o
hmm, on Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:19:16PM +0100, Landry Breuil said that
> I've moved away all waf users from it (ie x11/gigolo & www/vteplugin)
> but i'd rather remove waf from the tree instead of having someone losing
> time on that crap. Given that it's clearly hostile to any packaging
> effort, w
> I'll learn jig to dance it on the WAF grave.
Can't wait to see that ;-)
--
Antoine
2014/1/2 Landry Breuil :
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:40:40PM +1100, Ian McWilliam wrote:
>> On 1/01/2014 7:00 AM, Brad Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>> >Sadly enough autohell is the suck least of build infrastructure and
>> >there is a lot of documentation and knowledge regarding its inner
>> >workings. IMO
On Thu Jan 02, 2014 at 01:05:44PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 08:34:02PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> [...]
>
> Looks almost good to me, but you added a new font and there is no PLIST
> change. Spot the error ;)
>
oh sorry. diff with fix:
Index: Makefile
===
Hi,
The following diff fixes CVE-2011-4971 and CVE-2013-0179 for 5.4-STABLE.
They are respectively fixed in Memcached 1.4.16 and 1.4.17 upstream, but
I'm avoiding the update here because I'm targeting -STABLE, and 1.4.15
made things "more experimental" so 1.4.17 might not be ready yet.
These fixe
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 09:38:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> devel/hasktags: unhandled ELF relocation(Rel) type 10, ghc: unable to load
> package `integer-gmp'
> devel/hs-ghc-paths: unhandled ELF relocation(Rel) type 10, ghc: unable to
> load package `integer-gmp'
I'll update my i386 test
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:16:16PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > lang/nhc98: segfaults in build
>
> NOT_FOR_ARCHS= ${LP64_ARCHS} powerpc
> BROKEN-hppa=Segfault during build since the PIE switch
>
> Do we need this for bootstrapping or reference purposes or can we
> just remove it?
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> lang/nhc98: segfaults in build
NOT_FOR_ARCHS= ${LP64_ARCHS} powerpc
BROKEN-hppa=Segfault during build since the PIE switch
Do we need this for bootstrapping or reference purposes or can we
just remove it?
> lang/petite-chez: undefined reference to `__guard'
ONLY
I'm in the same boat as Scott (running jdk-1.7.0.21v0 on i386 that now
fails with thread error mentioned after upgrading to the Dec. 28
snapshots). I was previously running a snapshot from October so I doubt
that helps all that much, but I thought I'd toss it out there.
I'd sure like to get my Tom
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:19:16PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:40:40PM +1100, Ian McWilliam wrote:
> > On 1/01/2014 7:00 AM, Brad Smith wrote:
> >
> >
> > >Sadly enough autohell is the suck least of build infrastructure and
> > >there is a lot of documentation and kno
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:40:40PM +1100, Ian McWilliam wrote:
> On 1/01/2014 7:00 AM, Brad Smith wrote:
>
>
> >Sadly enough autohell is the suck least of build infrastructure and
> >there is a lot of documentation and knowledge regarding its inner
> >workings. IMO not something that can be said
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:58:55PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > mail/zarafa/zarafa: 'SWIG_From_long' was not declared in this scope
> > > textproc/redland-bindings: -php4 is no longer supported.
> >
> > Also on amd64. Likely fallout from the devel/swig update a week
> > ago.
>
> I Haven't s
On 1/01/2014 7:00 AM, Brad Smith wrote:
Sadly enough autohell is the suck least of build infrastructure and
there is a lot of documentation and knowledge regarding its inner
workings. IMO not something that can be said about the other build
infrastructure whether it is relatively common or not.
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 01:52:03PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > Not sure about cause yet, some may be PIE-related too:
>
> These are not:
>
> > lang/gcc/4.8: gcj: fatal error: can't specify '-D' without '--main'
>
> Sporadic build failure; also happens on
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Not sure about cause yet, some may be PIE-related too:
These are not:
> lang/gcc/4.8: gcj: fatal error: can't specify '-D' without '--main'
Sporadic build failure; also happens on amd64.
> mail/zarafa/zarafa: 'SWIG_From_long' was not declared in this scope
> textproc
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:47:14PM +0100, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Small diff to update Zsh to it's latest version. I added a new
> MASTER_SITE because the tarball has not yet reached the sourceforge sites.
> Tested on @amd64.
>
Updated diff to the latest version (5.0.4).
Spotted
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:08:42PM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
> On 12/25/2013 10:33 PM, Brian Callahan wrote:
> >Hi ports --
> >
> >Attached is a new port, multimedia/livestreamer-curses.
> >Livestreamer-curses is a curses-based front-end for livestreamer which
> >allows easy administration of yo
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 08:34:02PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
[...]
Looks almost good to me, but you added a new font and there is no PLIST
change. Spot the error ;)
> Index: pkg/PLIST
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/fonts/dina-fonts
A new patch, it is working on i386 ( I can start, connect, create a
database, insert elements and query):
$ cvs diff -Nup .
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/mongodb/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.
On k, dec 29, 2013 at 22:37:16 +0100, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote:
[...]
> I made a diff for:
[...]
> + 5.3 -stable (PostgreSQL 9.2.6, NOT tested but it should work. If
> anyone has a 5.3 system it would be nice to give it a try)
Hey guys, I hope I'm not too late for the party.
The build and inst
hmm, on Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 09:38:48PM +, Stuart Henderson said that
> Following are PIE-related, in some cases use of -fomit-frame-pointer for i386
> may help, others will need more.
>
> devel/hasktags: unhandled ELF relocation(Rel) type 10, ghc: unable to load
> package `integer-gmp'
> dev
On Jan 1, 2014 9:32 PM, "Brian Callahan" wrote:
>
> On 1/1/2014 11:35 PM, Ted Roby wrote:
>>
>> This diff was run against -current. It updates net/tintin++ to 2.00.9.
>>
>
> Any reason not to have updated to 2.01.0?
>
>
I missed this very recent update.
> Pedantic nit: the license is actually GP
30 matches
Mail list logo
