Is anyone currently working on creating a port for freepbx?
--
Jim Lucas
Is anyone else working to build a scribus port with a stable version of scribus?
--TimH
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:19:58PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:21:00PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >
> > in case anyone was curious of the current state.
>
> an update was requested. I plan to do a bulk build with an empty
> sys/audioio.h in the next week to see what
yvzljbprqawpudbws При помощи Шпи0на в Одноклассниках вы запросто можете
поприкалываться над своими знакомыми, прочитав их личные сообщения в
Одноклассниках oisdf http://nikifor1062.nm.ru/ozohejuf.html
On Tue 2010.01.19 at 18:59 -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> On Tue 2010.01.19 at 23:18 +0100, viq wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:35:37PM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > > On Sun 2010.01.17 at 22:38 -0500, Brad wrote:
> > > > I don't use this but someone mentioned it needed an update for
> > >
On Tue 2010.01.19 at 23:18 +0100, viq wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:35:37PM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > On Sun 2010.01.17 at 22:38 -0500, Brad wrote:
> > > I don't use this but someone mentioned it needed an update for KERN_PROC2.
> > >
> > > Please test.
> >
> > i don't use this either
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 05:35:37PM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> On Sun 2010.01.17 at 22:38 -0500, Brad wrote:
> > I don't use this but someone mentioned it needed an update for KERN_PROC2.
> >
> > Please test.
>
> i don't use this either; however, here's an updated diff with the the
> fifth and
>> Some post if up-to-date packages are available for the not so common
>> archs would be nice. Packages for sparc64 are somewhat old. Thanks!
>
> I am currently building OpenBSD -current for sparc64 and also some(!)
> packages (only what I need) for my main server. If you want to use them
> I cou
Marc Espie wrote:
> > WANTLIB=c ldns
> > BUILD_DEPENDS= ::net/ldns/libldns
> > RUN_DEPENDS=::net/ldns/libldns
> >
> > Should be
> >
> > LIB_DEPENDS=ldns::net/ldns/libldns
> > WANTLIB=c
>
> Did you actually check ?
Yes.
> First glance might not be enough. A port that
Landry Breuil wrote:
> The port seems wrong on other aspects, while here..
>
> WANTLIB=c ldns
> BUILD_DEPENDS= ::net/ldns/libldns
> RUN_DEPENDS=::net/ldns/libldns
>
> Should be
>
> LIB_DEPENDS= ldns::net/ldns/libldns
> WANTLIB= c
Yes.
However, this just happens to result in
hi there,
"Looking for packages|No need to reinstall ..."
i was wondering if 'update' would be a more fitting
verb instead of 'reinstall' in this case...
even if a package is replaced by the same version,
this happens when it has been compiled with a newer
library, so technically it's still an u
Hi,
> Some post if up-to-date packages are available for the not so common
> archs would be nice. Packages for sparc64 are somewhat old. Thanks!
I am currently building OpenBSD -current for sparc64 and also some(!)
packages (only what I need) for my main server. If you want to use them
I could pr
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:12:38PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:35:46AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:08:20PM +0100, viq wrote:
> > > Yes, I do realize we have a soft lock... But someone may enjoy it ;)
> >
> > No problem, just reme
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 01:32:47 pm viq wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:41:52AM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 18 January 2010 11:08:20 pm viq wrote:
> > > Yes, I do realize we have a soft lock... But someone may enjoy it ;)
> > > Here is an update to just relea
Is anyone working on adding this to the ports collection? If not, I may begin
working on it:
http://adodb.sourceforge.net
Thanks, Brad
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:35:46AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:08:20PM +0100, viq wrote:
> > Yes, I do realize we have a soft lock... But someone may enjoy it ;)
>
> No problem, just remember to remind us to look at it once we're finished.
i'll take care of this update a
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:41:52AM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Hi,
> On Monday 18 January 2010 11:08:20 pm viq wrote:
> > Yes, I do realize we have a soft lock... But someone may enjoy it ;)
> > Here is an update to just released 2.1.2 - using it on i386,
> > also built and started it with
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:08:20PM +0100, viq wrote:
> Yes, I do realize we have a soft lock... But someone may enjoy it ;)
> Here is an update to just released 2.1.2 - using it on i386,
> also built and started it with R13B03 on amd64.
Works for me so far on sparc64.
Server starts, I can chat wi
Hi,
On Monday 18 January 2010 11:08:20 pm viq wrote:
> Yes, I do realize we have a soft lock... But someone may enjoy it ;)
> Here is an update to just released 2.1.2 - using it on i386,
> also built and started it with R13B03 on amd64.
thanks for sending me the tarball.
it works for me on i386 to
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:08:20PM +0100, viq wrote:
> Yes, I do realize we have a soft lock... But someone may enjoy it ;)
No problem, just remember to remind us to look at it once we're finished.
20 matches
Mail list logo
