Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
from February 11. The same goes for SANE-backhands. HPLIP fails to
compile. I
Why aren't you using packages?
Dear Antoine,
I thought that the part of the testing process was to make sure that
ports compile properly. The
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
from February 11. The same goes for SANE-backhands. HPLIP fails to compile. I
Why aren't you using packages?
--
Antoine
helps if i attach the diff
On Feb 17, 2008 2:35 PM, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Among other things, this fixes the C++ binding which is apparently
> necessary for one KDE4 app...
>
> CK
>
> --
> GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
>
--
GDB has a 'break' feat
Among other things, this fixes the C++ binding which is apparently
necessary for one KDE4 app...
CK
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
You can also play with Autopsy...
Installing Autopsy is a little strange, anyway here's an useful
Autopsy port (attached).
$ cat pkg/DESCR
The Autopsy forensic browser is a graphical interface to utilities
in The Sleuth Kit. The Sleuth Kit and Autopsy provide many of the same
features as commerc
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Remark: The date in man pages needs to be updated as it is listing backhands
1.19 as of October 2006. As we know they are
released February 2008
Actually, this should be fixed upstream.
drivers. I could not test the all-in-one device as HPLIP fail
hi,
here comes an update to OpenVPN to 2.1RC7. Please test
this in the scenarios where you use OpenVPN and report
any breakage.
felix
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/openvpn/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Antti Harri wrote:
Hi,
while adding part library to cad/qcad I noticed this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/stuff/ports/mystuff/cad/qcad$ make port-lib-depends-check
objdump:
'/stuff/ports/mystuff/cad/qcad/w-qcad-2.0.5.0/fake-i386/usr/local/share/qcad/library/mechanical/tapers/brown
* Marc Winiger [2008-02-14]:
> Nikolay, do you see the problem we have? Do you have any objections to
> the way we solved it?
Makes sense to me, I just wanted to be sure there was a reason to have
multiple versions in tree.
Nikolay
