> tcpstat 1.5 compiles on openbsd 4.0 and fixes a few bugs in 1.4. So I was
> suprised it hasn't been upped to 1.5 in ports. Is there any reason?
> Otherwise I would try to do it myself.
When I spoke about being persistent I was specifically speaking about
submissions. I see no diff attached to
Don't forget to use patch -E
--
Matthieu Herrb
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/OpenBSD/ports/sysutils/pciutils/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -r1.1.1.1 Makefile
--- Makefile25 Mar 2006 21:53:35 - 1.1.1
> You might want to change WANTLIB to WANTLIB-main.
Done, thanks!
http://www.altroot.org/nspr-4.6.4.diff
--
Martynas Venckus
Martynas Venckus wrote:
Bugzilla Bug 357333: upgraded to NSPR 4.6.4.
approved for 1.8 branch, a=dveditz
Also, use new MULTI_PACKAGES...
http://www.altroot.org/nspr-4.6.4.diff
You might want to change WANTLIB to WANTLIB-main.
Other than that, it looks good.
--
Antoine
after updating to the latest snapshot (Nove 19/20, i386), I tried
installing the new openoffice package, which appears to have
incomplete dependency information - it requires curl:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo pkg_add -v -r openoffice
Password:
Error from ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/p
MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH checkins:
Bugzilla Bug 357333: upgraded to NSPR 4.6.4.
approved for 1.8 branch, a=dveditz
Also, use new MULTI_PACKAGES...
http://www.altroot.org/nspr-4.6.4.diff
Bugzilla Bug 357333: upgraded to NSS 3.11.4.
approved for 1.8 branch, a=dveditz
http://www.altroot.org/nss.tar.gz
R
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:46:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What's happening with the tcpstat port? I tried to get in touch
> with the maintainer but no reply. No reply from this list either,
> so I shall be persistent...
You did get a reply from this list. You asked if there was a reason
>
> We don't always have the time to look over everything that gets posted
> on the mailing list. Just be persistent, eventually someone will get
> to your submission.
>
> --
> Mathieu Sauve-Frankel
>
What's happening with the tcpstat port? I tried to get in touch with the
maintainer but no reply.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:09:33PM +0300, Anton Karpov wrote:
> 2006/11/22, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >Sorry that I didn't check the archives for that, I figured a search
> >through all the ports currently in -current was good enough. I wonder
> >why it was never put in.
>
> No ide
Selon Anton Karpov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No idea. Nobody here provided any feedback, and there was no reaction from
> ports committers. No reaction at all.
Well, for testing this one needs a WiFi supported adapter, which I don't.
> Maybe I did something wrong, and there is another way to submit
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 01:36:43AM +0300, Denis Sukhonin wrote:
> Hi, All!
>
> I wrote support of sensors for gkrellm.
> Else here `new' MULTI_PACKAGES.
>
> Works without any issues on i386.
wouldn't it make more sense to update gkrellm to a more recent version
(2.2.10) and add sensor support to
> Maybe I did something wrong, and there is another way to submit a port
> rather then posting it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't know.
There isn't.
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
2006/11/22, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry that I didn't check the archives for that, I figured a search
through all the ports currently in -current was good enough. I wonder
why it was never put in.
No idea. Nobody here provided any feedback, and there was no reaction from
ports
Sorry that I didn't check the archives for that, I figured a search
through all the ports currently in -current was good enough. I wonder
why it was never put in.
Jason
On 11/22/06, Anton Karpov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/11/21, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here is the port f
please test.
jakob
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/imap-uw/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.47
diff -u -r1.47 Makefile
--- Makefile7 Oct 2005 12:22:07 - 1.47
+++ Makefile22 Nov 2006 11:17:12
2006/11/21, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Here is the port for aircrack-ng, using version 0.6.2. This software
is GNU so it can be distributed just fine. Currently the only binaries
that don't compile on OpenBSD are aireplay-ng and airodump-ng, as they
use Linux-specific stuff. Please give
users of audio/lame, please test this diff.
jakob
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/audio/lame/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -r1.30 Makefile
--- Makefile11 Nov 2006 21:04:27 - 1.30
+++ Make
17 matches
Mail list logo
