Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Uwe Dippel wrote: This may be a dumb one, but I am curious: Why not check against the package names as they come from cvs ? Quick guess because you need a ports tree.

Re: mutt + ssl

2005-11-02 Thread Michael Coulter
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:17:35PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote: > Someone broke ssl in mutt/snapshot. Now when it launches it whines: Error in > /home/marco/.muttrc, line 62: imap_force_ssl: unknown variable source: errors > in /home/marco/.muttrc > > It worked before with mutt-1.5.8i-hcache >

RRDTool 1.2

2005-11-02 Thread Timothy A. Napthali
Newbie alert! Has anyone had any success getting RRDTool 1.2.x (in my case 1.2.11) to compile? I've had a few goes at it using instructions at http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/doc/rrdbuild.en.html but I just can't seem to get it to work. I keep getting issues like "Warning: Thi

mutt + ssl

2005-11-02 Thread Marco Peereboom
Someone broke ssl in mutt/snapshot. Now when it launches it whines: Error in /home/marco/.muttrc, line 62: imap_force_ssl: unknown variable source: errors in /home/marco/.muttrc It worked before with mutt-1.5.8i-hcache I am not smart enough to fix this but since all you guys are in Italy one mig

Re: sidebar patch for mutt

2005-11-02 Thread Jolan Luff
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:38:01PM -0600, Jolan Luff wrote: > hi, > > dlg@ and marco@ saw this screenshot of mutt with a sidebar that has a > folder list with new msg counts: > > http://vorlon.cwru.edu/~jrh29/mutt/mutt_shot_patch8.png > > they promised me beer if i included it so here's a diff t

sidebar patch for mutt

2005-11-02 Thread Jolan Luff
hi, dlg@ and marco@ saw this screenshot of mutt with a sidebar that has a folder list with new msg counts: http://vorlon.cwru.edu/~jrh29/mutt/mutt_shot_patch8.png they promised me beer if i included it so here's a diff to the port which adds the sidebar patch as a FLAVOR. all the config stuff i

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-02 Thread Christopher JS Vance
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:04:15AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: The idea is to add some v* suffix each time the numbering scheme changes. Okay. Some comments: - we still need the p* stuff to denote OpenBSD specific changes. Yes. - v* versions mean we can go backwards. If we find a security is

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-02 Thread Jim Razmus
igher than foo-2.0... > > > > The main objection you can have is that this is too complicated, but so > > far, we haven't been able to find any hole in that scheme... > > > > Opinions ? > > I was actually just thinking about this. I am in the process of

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-02 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 00:04:15 +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > Opinions ? If you dared to be radical, you'd split the name into 3 parts: generic name - human readable version - unix time. That would read python-expat-2.3.5-1131013320 python-expat: package name 2.3.5: for us humans to know the base ver

Re: www/snownews

2005-11-02 Thread David Cathcart
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:59:53PM +, David Cathcart wrote: > Update from 1.5.4 to 1.5.7 (current - tested on i386, amd64, macppc) > attached, Changelog mentiones a few bugfixes. Can you try and reproduce > the crash with this version. > > David > > Index: Makefile > ===

Re: qemu amd64 support

2005-11-02 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
a less intrusive diff than before, only affects amd64. still a hack. would work on it a bit more once i have some time. can anyone give it a run in i386 or macppc? thanks, f.- Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/emulators/qemu

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:54:03 +0100, Hans van Leeuwen wrote: > "pkg_check is build on top of OpenBSD's ports-system. It checks a given > list of packages for vulnerablities against the VuXML database. If no > package is given all installed packages will be checked." This may be a dumb one, but I

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-02 Thread Jolan Luff
o go back from foo-2.0 to foo-1.9, then we just bump v* so > that it becomes foo-1.9v0, which is higher than foo-2.0... > > The main objection you can have is that this is too complicated, but so > far, we haven't been able to find any hole in that scheme... > > Opinions ?

Re: www/snownews

2005-11-02 Thread David Cathcart
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 08:00:10PM +0100, Aleksander Piotrowski wrote: > Alf Schlichting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > /usr/ports/www/snownews dumped core recently. > > Maybe just version that we've in ports tree is broken? PLease upgrade > this port and we'll see if this fixes your problem ...

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Hans van Leeuwen wrote: After reading packages-specs(7) I managed to fix the problem. Could you please test this new version? It still works fine for me under macppc. _But_ I do have a question though. pkg_check reports that the following installed packages is affected by a vulnerability: mc

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread Andy Wingate
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hans van Leeuwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hans van Leeuwen wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:54:03PM +0100, Hans van Leeuwen > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > "pkg_check is build on top of OpenBSD's ports-system. It > > > > checks a given list

RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-02 Thread Marc Espie
In order to get you more confused, we've got more bright ideas about version numbering... Right now, we mostly use the `vendor' number scheme, and we add a simple p* suffix to denote what's going on with the OpenBSD port. As we've noticed, some times, vendor version numbers go backwards, or we do

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread steven mestdagh
> >>How do you decide whether a program is affected? I'm getting the result > >>below, which does not look correct, i.e. I assume 3.1.0 is not affected. > >>How up-to-date is the database you use? > >> > >But you are right, p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0 should not show up. I > >will look into it late

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread Hans van Leeuwen
Hans van Leeuwen wrote: steven mestdagh wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:54:03PM +0100, Hans van Leeuwen wrote: "pkg_check is build on top of OpenBSD's ports-system. It checks a given list of packages for vulnerablities against the VuXML database. If no package is given all installed pac

Re: ddclient writes a cache file in /etc

2005-11-02 Thread Nick Nauwelaerts
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:38:55 +0100 Aleksander Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonathan Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm also for /var/tmp as I use a read-only root fs. I know I can set > > it in the config file but it really belongs in /var as it keeps > > changing its content. >

Re: UPDATE: devel/gettext 0.14.5

2005-11-02 Thread Marc Espie
The attached patches wipe two uses of strcpy from the main library (libintl). There is one instance left, but it's harder to wipe out... $OpenBSD$ --- gettext-runtime/intl/log.c.orig Wed Nov 2 21:44:38 2005 +++ gettext-runtime/intl/log.c Wed Nov 2 21:45:26 2005 @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ _nl_log_unt

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* Antoine Jacoutot [2005-11-02]: > Just one question though, who takes care of the VuXML database for > OpenBSD ? I mean, can one trust it or is it totally unofficial ? It is totally unofficial for now, this might change in the future, or not. Robert ist maintaining it and I am committing stuff f

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread Hans van Leeuwen
steven mestdagh wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:54:03PM +0100, Hans van Leeuwen wrote: "pkg_check is build on top of OpenBSD's ports-system. It checks a given list of packages for vulnerablities against the VuXML database. If no package is given all installed packages will be checked."

Re: mozilla-firefox += README.OpenBSD

2005-11-02 Thread Ray Lai
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 01:18:47PM -0500, Ian Darwin wrote: > +Firefox looks for plugins in ~/.mozilla/plugins and in the directorie(s) > named > +in the environment variable MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH. I think `directories' is better than `directorie(s)'. The singular form of `directories' isn't `director

UPDATE: devel/gettext 0.14.5

2005-11-02 Thread Christian Weisgerber
This is a MAJOR update of devel/gettext from our historical version to the latest 0.14.5. Due to extensive changes, I've attached the new port as tarball rather than a diff. This update affects a large number of dependent ports and thus needs extra careful checking. Build and regressions tests s

UPDATE: mail/clamsmtp

2005-11-02 Thread Simon Dassow
Hi, this is an update of clamsmtp to version 1.6. ChangeLog: - IMPORTANT: Removed support for listening on ports under < 1024 - Support embedded NULLs in email data. - Fix problems with not listening properly when in daemon mode - Fix warnings when compiled with gcc 4.0 - Handle empty ad

Re: www/snownews

2005-11-02 Thread Aleksander Piotrowski
Alf Schlichting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /usr/ports/www/snownews dumped core recently. Maybe just version that we've in ports tree is broken? PLease upgrade this port and we'll see if this fixes your problem Alek -- Why use an algorithm when you've got a gigahertz CPU and a list compre

Re: ddclient writes a cache file in /etc

2005-11-02 Thread Aleksander Piotrowski
Jonathan Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm also for /var/tmp as I use a read-only root fs. I know I can set it in > the config file but it really belongs in /var as it keeps changing its > content. Don't forget guys to sent us a diff. Alek -- Arn-Kallan westchnął dyskretnie. Słuchanie kras

mozilla-firefox += README.OpenBSD

2005-11-02 Thread Ian Darwin
Consolidate configuration info from MESSAGE and DESCR into new README.OpenBSD. MESSAGE now refers to it. Install in binary directory as simplest place. Do not bump minor as there's no library changes -- right? Comments from kurt, wilfried and jmc, I've (hopefully) incorporated what they meant. In

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread Robert Nagy
sturm@ and me. On (02/11/05 18:12), Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > Just one question though, who takes care of the VuXML database for > OpenBSD ? I mean, can one trust it or is it totally unofficial ? > > Antoine

UPDATE: sysutils/wmwlmon

2005-11-02 Thread Marcus Glocker
Hi, Here the update for wmwlmon 0.6: - added smooth scrolling for network id - added special ascii characters, sometimes used for the network id - extended manpage Port tested on i386 current. Attached the diff. Greets, especially to the v2k5 porters team in Venice :) Marcus -- Marcus Glocke

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread steven mestdagh
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:54:03PM +0100, Hans van Leeuwen wrote: > > "pkg_check is build on top of OpenBSD's ports-system. It checks a given > list of packages for vulnerablities against the VuXML database. If no > package is given all installed packages will be checked." > > Please test the p

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread dorqus
Hans van Leeuwen wrote... > "pkg_check is build on top of OpenBSD's ports-system. It checks a given > list of packages for vulnerablities against the VuXML database. If no > package is given all installed packages will be checked." > > Please test the port and the program. Seems to work OK, rep

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Hans van Leeuwen wrote: "pkg_check is build on top of OpenBSD's ports-system. It checks a given list of packages for vulnerablities against the VuXML database. If no package is given all installed packages will be checked." Please test the port and the program. First, let me tell you that

NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-02 Thread Hans van Leeuwen
"pkg_check is build on top of OpenBSD's ports-system. It checks a given list of packages for vulnerablities against the VuXML database. If no package is given all installed packages will be checked." Please test the port and the program. Thanks in advance! Hans van Leeuwen pkg_check-0.9

Re: ddclient writes a cache file in /etc

2005-11-02 Thread Jonathan Weiss
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:24:45 +1100 > Christopher JS Vance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:59:37AM +1100, Christopher JS Vance wrote: >>> If you've got a static address, the information might be correct >>> across reboot, so /var/run feels slightly wrong. How about /var

Re: ddclient writes a cache file in /etc

2005-11-02 Thread Nick Nauwelaerts
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:24:45 +1100 Christopher JS Vance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:59:37AM +1100, Christopher JS Vance wrote: > >If you've got a static address, the information might be correct > >across reboot, so /var/run feels slightly wrong. How about /var/db? > >

www/snownews

2005-11-02 Thread Alf Schlichting
Hi! /usr/ports/www/snownews dumped core recently. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7$ uname -a OpenBSD werkel.rechners.lemarit.com 3.8 GENERIC#209 i386 gdb output: ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:16$ gdb -batch -x commands -q /usr/local/bin/snownews snownews.core Core was generated by `snownews'. Program terminated wit

Re: textproc/expat shared lib version problem

2005-11-02 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Moritz Grimm wrote: Aehrrmmph, yes, I guess it's also worth noting that this is on -current on i386 as of today with a standard configuration. :) I've been having the same problem under macppc too for days, I don't think this is platerform related anyway. Regards, Antoine

Re: textproc/expat shared lib version problem

2005-11-02 Thread Moritz Grimm
Moritz Grimm wrote: having textproc/p5-XML-Parser installed, it is always shown as outdated by the new out-of-date script. It wants to be use expat.5.0 instead of expat.4.0. Aehrrmmph, yes, I guess it's also worth noting that this is on -current on i386 as of today with a standard configurati

textproc/expat shared lib version problem

2005-11-02 Thread Moritz Grimm
Hi, having textproc/p5-XML-Parser installed, it is always shown as outdated by the new out-of-date script. It wants to be use expat.5.0 instead of expat.4.0. The reason for this is that textproc/expat contains libexpat.4.0, while the base system's X11 has /usr/X11R6/lib/libexpat.so.5.0. T