On Saturday, January 15, 2011, Jeffery MacEachern wrote:
> Do you happen to have patches for these against the 4.6 branch handy?
> If not, I'm afraid I probably won't have time to test them. :/
i've backported them all. since the changes contained crash fixes (along with
probably half a dozen oth
Do you happen to have patches for these against the 4.6 branch handy?
If not, I'm afraid I probably won't have time to test them. :/
- Jeffery MacEachern
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 17:39, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday, January 7, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> hi ...
>>
>> i committed two se
On Friday, January 7, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi ...
>
> i committed two sets of changes yesterday to libtaskamanger and the tasks
> widget:
i just committed another rather large set of changes that need to be
backported to fix this bug:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258584
Alright, I think I can do that. However, due to waiting on a new hard
drive to come in, I haven't bothered to keep up for a while; I'm
currently sitting at some mish-mash of RC1 & RC2. Will that present
any problems?
- Jeffery MacEachern
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 18:57, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> O
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011, Jeffery MacEachern wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Given the lack of reply here, does this still need testing? I might
> not be able to do it right away, but I'd be glad to help.
yes :) anytime this week works fine ... i plan to backport on sunday if there
are no shouts ot
Hi Aaron,
Given the lack of reply here, does this still need testing? I might
not be able to do it right away, but I'd be glad to help.
Cheers,
- Jeffery MacEachern
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:31, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi ...
>
> i committed two sets of changes yesterday to libtaskamanger an
hi ...
i committed two sets of changes yesterday to libtaskamanger and the tasks
widget:
* a change to libtaskmanager that re-groups windows that were previously
ungrouped because they were marked with 'demands attention'. this is obviously
a bugfix, but the change to accomplish it, while not