On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Jan Grulich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the mockup, I think it was a great idea, so I hope you will
> like the links below. Any comments and suggestions for improvements are
> welcome :)
>
> [1] http://www.imagehosting.cz/?v=nm14.png
> [2] http://www.imagehosting.
On 03/29/2013 01:30 PM, Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Martin Klapetek
mailto:martin.klape...@gmail.com>> wrote:
This^ one for me. Also an idea - at the bottom it says "Connected
(janul)", would it be possible to put string "Connected networks"
above the co
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Martin Klapetek
wrote:
>
> This^ one for me. Also an idea - at the bottom it says "Connected
> (janul)", would it be possible to put string "Connected networks" above the
> connected networks (top of the plasmoid) and then separate the disconnected
> networks by a
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Jan Grulich wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 04:43 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, March 28, 2013 15:08:09 Jan Grulich wrote:
>>
>>> * why there are long progress bars under each name while there is a
static
icon to the left that also visualizes a sig
On 03/28/2013 04:43 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Thursday, March 28, 2013 15:08:09 Jan Grulich wrote:
* why there are long progress bars under each name while there is a static
icon to the left that also visualizes a signal.
*
I thought it will look nicer than to have static icon. It's also mo
Hi,
these answers are from both :)
On 03/28/2013 01:56 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
Hi Lukas and Jan,
On Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:52:24 Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
we didn't initially think we could get
it in a usable state in such a short time ;)
QML can be like that :)
Lamarque is/was involved wit
On Thursday, March 28, 2013 15:08:09 Jan Grulich wrote:
> > * why there are long progress bars under each name while there is a static
> > icon to the left that also visualizes a signal.
>
> *
>
> I thought it will look nicer than to have static icon. It's also more
> accurate.
Yes, it will cert
Hi Lukas and Jan,
On Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:52:24 Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> we didn't initially think we could get
> it in a usable state in such a short time ;)
QML can be like that :)
Lamarque is/was involved with this decision as well?
> The current implementation uses only the new libnm-qt
Dne 27.3.2013 20:49, Aaron J. Seigo napsal(a):
hi ...
I just read about the progress being made on the new QML based Network
Management plasmoid. I'm very happy to see development happening, especially
as it means that that Lamarque is not on his own here.
When are you planning on bringing disc
