On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Jan Grulich <jgrul...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 04:43 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > >> On Thursday, March 28, 2013 15:08:09 Jan Grulich wrote: >> >>> * why there are long progress bars under each name while there is a >>>> static >>>> icon to the left that also visualizes a signal. >>>> >>> * >>> >>> I thought it will look nicer than to have static icon. It's also more >>> accurate. >>> >> Yes, it will certainly be more accurate. The average person only needs so >> much >> accuracy, however, to make a decision. The difference between 54% and 48% >> signal strength is probably not a huge issue in practice. :) >> >> The full strength could be shown in the details, of course. It just would >> be >> nice to see how minimal we can get the main UI and still be usable. >> >> Which of these two would you prefer? > - > http://www.imagehosting.cz/?v=**nmugu.png<http://www.imagehosting.cz/?v=nmugu.png> > or > - > http://www.imagehosting.cz/?v=**nm1.png<http://www.imagehosting.cz/?v=nm1.png> This^ one for me. Also an idea - at the bottom it says "Connected (janul)", would it be possible to put string "Connected networks" above the connected networks (top of the plasmoid) and then separate the disconnected networks by a thin line and/or string "Other networks"? I'll do a mockup :) Cheers -- Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
