Re: javascript interactive console

On Monday 31 March 2014, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > Right it could be put together with the other plasma parts when splitting > > and maybe it doesn't make much sense to change anything prior to > > splitting. > > Now that kde-workspace is split, does it make more sense for > plasma-shell to be m

Re: javascript interactive console

On Monday 31 March 2014, Nowardev-Team wrote: > * move the console in another process, but there may be too much that would > have to be exposed trough dbus for that it needs to be in the same process, needs access to containment pointers, otherwise, as you note the amount of stuff to be exposed

Re: javascript interactive console

t; On Wednesday 26 February 2014 11:36:16 Martin Gräßlin wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 26 February 2014 11:27:04 Marco Martin wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> yesterday i was toying with porting the javascript interactive console >>>>> for >>>>

Re: javascript interactive console

t; yesterday i was toying with porting the javascript interactive console >>>> for >>>> plasma-shell. >>>> one thing that i stumbled upon is how much dependencies the thing has. >>>> >>>> apart the usual removal of kde4support, it depends from new

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

> On Feb. 26, 2014, 5:43 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: > > src/shell/CMakeLists.txt, line 20 > > > > > > This would mean: > > a) propagate KTextEditor to part of the KF5 releases (that was not the > > case with

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

> On Feb. 26, 2014, 5:43 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: > > src/shell/CMakeLists.txt, line 20 > > > > > > This would mean: > > a) propagate KTextEditor to part of the KF5 releases (that was not the > > case with

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

> On Feb. 26, 2014, 5:43 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: > > src/shell/CMakeLists.txt, line 20 > > > > > > This would mean: > > a) propagate KTextEditor to part of the KF5 releases (that was not the > > case with

Re: javascript interactive console

On Wednesday, 2014-02-26, 20:07:58, Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 26 February 2014 19:51:54 Kevin Krammer wrote: > > > if some kind of api is done to link the whatever bindings are in the > > > application that is using qtscript and the console (just something > > > really > > > easy, like run

Re: javascript interactive console

On Wednesday 26 February 2014 19:51:54 Kevin Krammer wrote: > > if some kind of api is done to link the whatever bindings are in the > > application that is using qtscript and the console (just something really > > easy, like run this string with a script) then i guess it would be > > realistic pro

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

> On Feb. 26, 2014, 5:43 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: > > src/shell/CMakeLists.txt, line 20 > > > > > > This would mean: > > a) propagate KTextEditor to part of the KF5 releases (that was not the > > case with

Re: javascript interactive console

On Wednesday, 2014-02-26, 19:00:49, Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 26 February 2014 18:51:34 Kevin Krammer wrote: > > On Wednesday, 2014-02-26, 11:27:04, Marco Martin wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > yesterday i was toying with porting the javascript interactive console &

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

> On Feb. 26, 2014, 5:43 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: > > src/shell/CMakeLists.txt, line 20 > > > > > > This would mean: > > a) propagate KTextEditor to part of the KF5 releases (that was not the > > case with

Re: javascript interactive console

On Wednesday 26 February 2014 15:00:36 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > so, opinion poll: > > move plasma-shell to kde-workspace? (btw, is kde-workspace the final > > nameit's going to have? what is the status of the splitting it?) > > Right it could be put together with the other plasma parts when split

Re: javascript interactive console

On Wednesday 26 February 2014 18:51:34 Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Wednesday, 2014-02-26, 11:27:04, Marco Martin wrote: > > Hi all, > > yesterday i was toying with porting the javascript interactive console for > > plasma-shell. > > Maybe that is a stupid question, but

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

> On Feb. 26, 2014, 5:43 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: > > src/shell/CMakeLists.txt, line 20 > > > > > > This would mean: > > a) propagate KTextEditor to part of the KF5 releases (that was not the > > case with

Re: javascript interactive console

On Wednesday, 2014-02-26, 11:27:04, Marco Martin wrote: > Hi all, > yesterday i was toying with porting the javascript interactive console for > plasma-shell. Maybe that is a stupid question, but how Plasma specific is this console? Would it be something other QtScript/QJSEng

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116085/#review50965 --- src/shell/CMakeLists.txt

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116085/ --- (Updated Feb. 26, 2014, 5:37 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116085/#review50963 --- This review has been submitted with commit 1fd741b5d30929d183

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116085/#review50960 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Edmundson On Feb. 26, 2014, 4:03

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116085/ --- (Updated Feb. 26, 2014, 4:03 p.m.) Review request for Plasma. Repositor

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

> On Feb. 26, 2014, 3:47 p.m., David Edmundson wrote: > > src/shell/interactiveconsole.cpp, line 57 > > > > > > Are you not doing that on line 130? yeah, comes from the copy of the oold file ;) > On Feb. 26, 20

Re: Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116085/#review50941 --- src/shell/interactiveconsole.h

Review Request 116085: welcome back the javascript interactive console

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116085/ --- Review request for Plasma. Repository: plasma-framework Description ---

Re: Re: javascript interactive console

On Wednesday 26 February 2014 12:56:41 Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 26 February 2014 11:36:16 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 February 2014 11:27:04 Marco Martin wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > yesterday i was toying with porting the javascript interactive con

Re: javascript interactive console

Hello, On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > move plasma-shell to kde-workspace IMHO No I think.. Lets see if I develop shell "Plasma ABC" I have to pull dep of kde-workspace.. instead I prefer to have separate repo for the shell.. :) Thanks! -- Bhushan Shah http://bhush9.gi

Re: javascript interactive console

On Wednesday 26 February 2014 11:36:16 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Wednesday 26 February 2014 11:27:04 Marco Martin wrote: > > Hi all, > > yesterday i was toying with porting the javascript interactive console for > > plasma-shell. > > one thing that i stumbled upon i

Re: javascript interactive console

On 02/26/2014 09:36 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Wednesday 26 February 2014 11:27:04 Marco Martin wrote: >> Hi all, >> yesterday i was toying with porting the javascript interactive console for >> plasma-shell. >> one thing that i stumbled upon is how much dependencies

Re: javascript interactive console

On Wednesday 26 February 2014 11:27:04 Marco Martin wrote: > Hi all, > yesterday i was toying with porting the javascript interactive console for > plasma-shell. > one thing that i stumbled upon is how much dependencies the thing has. > > apart the usual removal of kde4suppor

javascript interactive console

Hi all, yesterday i was toying with porting the javascript interactive console for plasma-shell. one thing that i stumbled upon is how much dependencies the thing has. apart the usual removal of kde4support, it depends from new things like ktexteditor,ktextbrowser etc. so, it would bump up the