Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, February 2, 2011, Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > plasma/activityrunner/aseigo > > kwin/coding-style/graesslin/ > > plasma-mobile/awesomeness/notmart (no, not a real branch ;) > > kdm/plasma-frontend/sreich (not real either, but could be)

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > plasma/activityrunner/aseigo > kwin/coding-style/graesslin/ > plasma-mobile/awesomeness/notmart (no, not a real branch ;) > kdm/plasma-frontend/sreich (not real either, but could be) > > it makes for branches names that are a bit long, but it

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > it makes for branches names that are a bit long, but it gives all the info > needed at a glance and orders things nicely together. tab completion makes > length a non-issue ime. > > thoughts? +1 just had done one without plasma/ a bit ago..

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Ivan Cukic
On Wednesday, 2. February 2011. 12.41.42 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > in any case, i just pushed a new feature branch to kde-workspace: > > aseigo/activityrunner ... just as Martin did with the kwin branches, > > i've > > after some discussion on

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > in any case, i just pushed a new feature branch to kde-workspace: > aseigo/activityrunner ... just as Martin did with the kwin branches, i've after some discussion on k-c-d, one idea from the calligra team is to preface the branch name with th

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, February 2, 2011, Ivan Čukić wrote: > I might be missing something, though. so far, i don't think you are :) -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks sig

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Ivan Čukić
I'm not really familiarized with Git yet, but I think that personal clones are a bit too much. Those are ok when contributors are from outside of the core-devel team and have no push rights on the master, but I don't think it is needed for most of us. I might be missing something, though. -- C

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, February 2, 2011, Marco Martin wrote: > atm is a normal remote branch of master? not a clone? yes; my fear of clones is that we'll end up with a dozen different clones with various branches in them and it'll be painful to keep track of them all as people come and go. unless someon

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > hi all... > > huzzah for the new git, huh? ok.. so ... feature branches. there is going > to be an irc meeting, probably the weekend after next, about the workflow > for kdelibs and kde-runtime. i hope we will be able to use that for > kde-wor

feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-01 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
hi all... huzzah for the new git, huh? ok.. so ... feature branches. there is going to be an irc meeting, probably the weekend after next, about the workflow for kdelibs and kde-runtime. i hope we will be able to use that for kde-workspace as well. in any case, i just pushed a new feature bran