No team meeting today

2016-06-05 Thread Martin Graesslin
Hi all, we decided to cancel this weeks Monday meeting as most are at a sprint or just don't have time today. Which would result in me being the only one with a webcam around which doesn't make sense for a video meeting. See you at next weeks meeting Cheers Martin signature.asc Description: T

Re: Re: Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-27 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 16:49:42 Mark wrote: > I'm not sure about this but someone with in depth git knowledge can > probably clarify on this. I think git has an option to at least show > which people commited to which file. If you simply do that for all of git log . in a given directory helps

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread Mark
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday, June 21, 2012 16:49:42 Mark wrote: >> Now this won't give the maintainer or any status but it does give an >> idea if a certain component is even maintained. > > that pretty much describes what i do when i want to check in on a

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 16:49:42 Mark wrote: > Now this won't give the maintainer or any status but it does give an > idea if a certain component is even maintained. that pretty much describes what i do when i want to check in on a given bit of code (not just in plasma) ... -- Aaron J. Seig

Re: Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread Mark
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Thursday 21 June 2012 14:47:36 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> i can see having a list of maintainers for components that are "strongly >> maintained" by an individual, such as the comics applet (to pick something >> completely at random). but t

Re: Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Thursday 21 June 2012 14:47:36 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > i can see having a list of maintainers for components that are "strongly > maintained" by an individual, such as the comics applet (to pick something > completely at random). but then ... using git i'd be able to figure that out > immediatel

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread David Edmundson
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday, June 21, 2012 13:23:02 David Edmundson wrote: >> I made a similar form for Plasma is available here: >> http://community.kde.org/Plasma/Maintainership please fill-in as >> appropriate. > > there are 51 plasmoids in kdeplasma-add

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread David Edmundson
Can I ask for some clarification on why my message now have to go through moderation? I'm sure that's new. As far as I'm aware I've been generally courteous and constructive despite all the arguing around. If no-one tells me what I've done wrong I can't improve. If it's an overall change on every

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 13:23:02 David Edmundson wrote: > I made a similar form for Plasma is available here: > http://community.kde.org/Plasma/Maintainership please fill-in as > appropriate. there are 51 plasmoids in kdeplasma-addons alone. some plasmoids have clear owners (for various reason

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread David Edmundson
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > Hi all, > this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it in > something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part  was > useful) > > The meeting started from the realization that there is an 1% o

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:29:55 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 21:19:35 Marco Martin wrote: > > this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it > > in something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part > > was useful) > > tha

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 21:19:35 Marco Martin wrote: > this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it > in something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part > was useful) thanks for the summary Marco. at the start of the meeting i also shared

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:33:52 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: > What is missing from this discussion is how to use bugzilla efficiently. we need to sort out how we work together first. trying to figure out how people external to the team have their input integrated is something that follows. --

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread Valorie Zimmerman
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > Hi all, > this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it in > something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part  was > useful) I found the meeting somewhere between great and excellent. It ma

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-21 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf
On 06/20/2012 09:19 PM, Marco Martin wrote: Hi all, this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it in something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part was useful) The meeting started from the realization that there is an 1% of cases where the d

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-20 Thread Marco Martin
Hi all, this is a very raw synopsis of the meeting, i hope we can now transform it in something very productive (i think the meeting especially the last part was useful) The meeting started from the realization that there is an 1% of cases where the discussion doesn't go well and can get peopl

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-20 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 20 June 2012, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: > I won't be there at the meeting unfortunately. I'll log it to read it. > Personally I like things to be said face to face that's why I take time > to write these mails. And I do feel targeted. > In any case I hope I clarified my position and if

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-20 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf
On 06/20/2012 03:50 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 14:12:48 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: I think I might be one of the targets on why this IRC meeting is no one is a target at this, or any other, plasma meeting. it's not about rooting out blame or villianizing anyone. rather

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-20 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 14:12:48 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: > I think I might be one of the targets on why this IRC meeting is no one is a target at this, or any other, plasma meeting. it's not about rooting out blame or villianizing anyone. rather we're going to try and re-find our set of co

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-20 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 14:12:48 Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: > The call for an IRC meeting mail starts with > "it has become apparent that we need to do something here about the > attitude demonstrated by some of those who have chosen to participate in > plasma." > in which I would have liked t

Re: Team meeting today

2012-06-20 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf
Hi all, hi Valorie, Thanks a lot for this, and thanks a lot for an external person stepping in. I think I might be one of the targets on why this IRC meeting is conducted ("I think" "I might" show you that I am not entirely sure of what is going on here, I only "feel" it "might" be about me.)

Team meeting today

2012-06-20 Thread Valorie Zimmerman
Hello Plasma team, I've heard that this group is experiencing some difficulties, and the Community Working Group has been asked to intervene. We usually are asked to come into crises, while we would really prefer to work with groups to improve community. We've been developing a tool to help with t