First things first: the new patch looks great, then
On Saturday 21 March 2009 20:37:53 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>
> it might also be interesting to note what kind of information is in the
> search term .. numbers, words, etc?
>
One possible way could be a setExampleValue(const QVariant &value). This
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/373/
---
(Updated 2009-03-21 14:06:55.122599)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
On Saturday 21 March 2009, Dario Freddi wrote:
> Another thing: we shouldn't let :q: always translate to "search term": for
> example, the powerdevil runner lets you enter screen brightness
> , and having the user read "screen brightness "
> can be confusing.
>
> Apart from PowerDevil, each runner
On Saturday 21 March 2009, Dario Freddi wrote:
> A syntax can have unlimited examples but one single description. This is
> the only weird point to me. I don't really get when I should add another
> example to the syntax or a completely different syntax, since I can
> document only a syntax, and no
Another thing: we shouldn't let :q: always translate to "search term": for
example, the powerdevil runner lets you enter screen brightness ,
and having the user read "screen brightness " can be confusing.
Apart from PowerDevil, each runner that triggers an action with a parameter
would actually
Hello,
This patch is really some great stuff, since it is the really needed first
step to build docs for KRunners. Though, I have one main concern about the
example syntaxes and description.
A syntax can have unlimited examples but one single description. This is the
only weird point to me. I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/373/
---
(Updated 2009-03-21 10:10:49.543387)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/373/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
Patch provides syntax registration fo
