> On 2010-04-07 15:37:53, Marco Martin wrote:
> > thinking about it, if we want animations to go back and forth, what about
> > having it in Animation? it could make sense for most of those
> > there would be a boolean bouncing (better name required)
> > an "attenuation" value and the "bouncecen
> On 2010-04-07 15:16:04, Marco Martin wrote:
> > don't think it's the right approach.
> > we should probably have easing curve support for our animations that are
> > directly qabstractanimations
>
> igorto wrote:
> so you suggest create our own easing curvers for special animations like
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3513/#review4912
---
thinking about it, if we want animations to go back and forth, what ab
> On 2010-04-07 15:16:04, Marco Martin wrote:
> > don't think it's the right approach.
> > we should probably have easing curve support for our animations that are
> > directly qabstractanimations
>
> igorto wrote:
> so you suggest create our own easing curvers for special animations like
> On 2010-04-07 15:16:04, Marco Martin wrote:
> > don't think it's the right approach.
> > we should probably have easing curve support for our animations that are
> > directly qabstractanimations
so you suggest create our own easing curvers for special animations like that?
- igorto
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3513/#review4909
---
don't think it's the right approach.
we should probably have easing cu
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3513/#review4908
---
Ship it!
Looks good. And i nice animation.
- igorto
On 2010-04-07
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3513/
---
Review request for Plasma, igorto and Adenilson Cavalcanti.
Summary
---
A n
